BF2S Forums Ron Paul, the savior of America

ghettoperson wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Maybe he is on the wrong ticket. Conspiracy theorist usually don't align themselves with conservatives.

Are you saying he's wrong? Doesn't sound like a conspiracy to me, sounds like how governments get things done.

Maybe you don't know what a conspiracy is? Perhaps being a congressman he would like to personally offer some evidence instead of scavaging votes from the Rosie O'Donnell/Alex Jones crowd. No matter, he just lost his chance.

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Are you saying he's wrong? Doesn't sound like a conspiracy to me, sounds like how governments get things done.

Maybe you don't know what a conspiracy is? Perhaps being a congressman/whacko he would like to personally offer some evidence instead of scavaging votes from the Rosie O'Donnell/Alex Jones crowd. No matter, he just lost his chance.

Wow. Funny as a "conspiricist" he did so well in the debate. At least according to the American people.

Kmarion wrote:

Do you realize that nearly every other conservative poll (Drudge, Hotair, Fox) does not even have him placing in the top five? MSNBC is not exactly a Republican hub. Pay attention to the GOP intense sites if you want a heads up on who the leaders are, especially those that allow their readers to vote and comment. That was round one, we will have another one in six days. In the mean time you might want to check this out to see who the top GOP guys are from a variety of different places.

ghettoperson wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Are you saying he's wrong? Doesn't sound like a conspiracy to me, sounds like how governments get things done.

Maybe you don't know what a conspiracy is? Perhaps being a congressman/whacko he would like to personally offer some evidence instead of scavaging votes from the Rosie O'Donnell/Alex Jones crowd. No matter, he just lost his chance.

I know perfectly well what a conspiracy is, thanks, but it'd hardly be the first time that something like that had happened would it? Sounds more like a realist than a theorist.

No it wouldn't, but making assumptions (especially on events that haven't happened) without offering proof would make you a theorist. Liberals love him... again, wrong ticket.

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Wow. Funny as a "conspiricist" he did so well in the debate. At least according to the American people.

Kmarion wrote:

Do you realize that nearly every other conservative poll (Drudge, Hotair, Fox) does not even have him placing in the top five? MSNBC is not exactly a Republican hub. Pay attention to the GOP intense sites if you want a heads up on who the leaders are, especially those that allow their readers to vote and comment. That was round one, we will have another one in six days. In the mean time you might want to check this out to see who the top GOP guys are from a variety of different places.

Whatever the polls say that you list, alot of people like what they hear from Ron Paul. HE may not fit the conservative standard of "more of the same", but at least he has his own views with less rhetoric. TO imply he panders to the "conspiricists vote" is wrong. Thats a small niche that hardly matters anyway.

If he doesn't get the nomination, he'd make a great independent candidate. And with everyone frustrated witht the "two party system" he may just win.

So dismiss him and his views. He has more balls than Guilliani. (who is apparently winning)

I'm just explaining the reality of it. He does well in polls like the MSNBC poll because it attracts the other side (the left). A poll like that does not require the Dems to sacrifice a vote for their candidate, so they are going to vote for the one the best represented them. But when it comes down to a Presidential election the GOP can not count on those votes. He will not make it.

I firmly believe his campaign will gain steam as time goes on.  I see this as a "grass roots" campaign where word of mouth from person to person will get attention for him making him the popular candidate.   Again, I'm a registered Democrat, but this guy has my full attention at this point.

I'd vote Republican if he got the nomination, damn skippy.

He's hardcore libertarian, sticks to his principles, no suprises, no pandering.  Honest to a fault.

The Democrats haven't produced a viable candidate and the Republican "front-runners" are more of the same.

He's not advocating isolationism at all, and he's not advocating "not dealing with terrorism".  He's advocating a foreign policy based on free trade and the free market with little or no imperialistic intervention.  He advocating cutting government spending to the bare bones of just Defense, Law Enforcement, Public Safety, and infrastructure...with the tax reductions to match the new spending style.  Its hard to imagine not paying income tax, but less than 100 years ago this was normal.  Less than 50 years ago 2% income tax was normal.  Fair sales tax is a damn good idea if you read about it.  Stabilizing our currency with an actual standard (any and all precious metals, for example) would eliminate the need for most of our wars and foreign policy fuckups, as well as our police state forming back home.

I don't agree with his stance on abortion, but I think it would be moderated to a great degree.

As for the premise that "liberals" would rather vote for Hillary than Ron Paul so the initial results don't count...think again.

Here's another great video showing Ron Paul.

Spread the word.. that guy is just what America need

This guy is a quack.

Ron Paul will never get elected.

He is a tard.

usmarine2005 wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

This guy is a quack.

lol.. would have expected that from you.

I suppose any sign of intelligence in the republican party automatically sets of the "quack detectors" eh?

I am not a Repub.

The guy thinks there is a huge 9/11 conspiracy.  Might as well elect the dudes from loose change.  He thinks we are going to nuke Iran any day now.  Come on man.

He just say that 911 happened mostly because of the american foreign policy. He think that you guys should have chased Ben Laden all the way to pakistan where he is right now instead of focusing in Iraq.

Hes just telling the truth, hes no conspiracist.. please provide the link where he said that he think that you are going to nuke Iran any day now

I watched a few more things this guy says, and while I like some of his ideas, Gulani or w/e his name is better, simply because he's not intimidate by a mob of Arabs; or anyone for that matter.

Could someone please give me a link that has evidence showing that he thinks 911 was a conspiracy?

This guy has my vote, hope like hell he gets the nomination.  Be nice to have an old school republican back in office (think Eisenhower).  What republicans are today would make most republicans from 50 years ago cringe in horror, but the same could be said about the democrats.  What the hell happened to this country anyways?

CommieChipmunk wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

This guy is a quack.

lol.. would have expected that from you.

I suppose any sign of intelligence in the republican party automatically sets of the "quack detectors" eh?

No, he's a quack. He seeks to appeal to the libertarians within the Republican party, but he's not getting anywhere. For one thing, he blames too much on American Foreign policy, and second, his isolation policy is nice and dandy if we hadn't been attacked by Arabs.

It seems liberals and dumbasses alike cite Bush's claims to withdrawing America from world affairs before he was elected as proof he's a hypocrite--only problem is they seem to forgot one problem--we were attacked by Muslim bums.