unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6794|PNW

NEW YORK - Heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio and envelope-pushers Rosie O'Donnell and Sacha Baron Cohen are among the entertainment newsmakers on Time magazine's list of 100 people who shape the world.

The list of 100 most influential, on newsstands Friday, also includes Queen Elizabeth II, presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, director Martin Scorsese and model Kate Moss. It does not include President Bush.

Cont'd: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_ … le_time100
So a man with access to the red phone and button, even if he stumbles over words and invents a few new ones, is less influential than, say, Barack Obama?

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-05-03 12:11:45)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,973|6654|949

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

NEW YORK - Heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio and envelope-pushers Rosie O'Donnell and Sacha Baron Cohen are among the entertainment newsmakers on Time magazine's list of 100 people who shape the world.

The list of 100 most influential, on newsstands Friday, also includes Queen Elizabeth II, presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, director Martin Scorsese and model Kate Moss. It does not include President Bush.

Cont'd: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_ … le_time100
So a man with access to the red phone and button, even if he stumbles over words and invents a few new ones, is less influential than, say, Barack Obama?
People would rather read about Kate Moss and Leo DiCaprio.  It's more entertaining, less actual thinking involved.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6685|USA

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

NEW YORK - Heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio and envelope-pushers Rosie O'Donnell and Sacha Baron Cohen are among the entertainment newsmakers on Time magazine's list of 100 people who shape the world.

The list of 100 most influential, on newsstands Friday, also includes Queen Elizabeth II, presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, director Martin Scorsese and model Kate Moss. It does not include President Bush.

Cont'd: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_ … le_time100
So a man with access to the red phone and button, even if he stumbles over words and invents a few new ones, is less influential than, say, Barack Obama?
Kate moss? The crackhead?
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6672

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

NEW YORK - Heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio and envelope-pushers Rosie O'Donnell and Sacha Baron Cohen are among the entertainment newsmakers on Time magazine's list of 100 people who shape the world.

The list of 100 most influential, on newsstands Friday, also includes Queen Elizabeth II, presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, director Martin Scorsese and model Kate Moss. It does not include President Bush.

Cont'd: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_ … le_time100
So a man with access to the red phone and button, even if he stumbles over words and invents a few new ones, is less influential than, say, Barack Obama?
Kate moss? The crackhead?
She introduced cocaine to a whole new generation of adoring 15 year olds!
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6685|USA
The YOUTUBE founders are the only legitimate looking people on the list provided.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6591|Mountains of NC

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

NEW YORK - Heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio and envelope-pushers Rosie O'Donnell and Sacha Baron Cohen are among the entertainment newsmakers on Time magazine's list of 100 people who shape the world.

The list of 100 most influential, on newsstands Friday, also includes Queen Elizabeth II, presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, director Martin Scorsese and model Kate Moss. It does not include President Bush.

Cont'd: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_ … le_time100
So a man with access to the red phone and button, even if he stumbles over words and invents a few new ones, is less influential than, say, Barack Obama?
Kate moss? The crackhead .................................................... and democrat president candidate
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
weamo8
Member
+50|6465|USA
I would have a hard time considering any media institution "fair and balanced."
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6396|Kyiv, Ukraine
A president whose only legacy is a cooked-up war and a schizophrenic domestic policy*, I can see why Time thought he was irrelevant now.  He did make "man of the year before" I think, and then blew it.



*hat tip to flernk at Dailykos
XanKrieger
iLurk
+60|6681|South West England

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

A president whose only legacy is a cooked-up war and a schizophrenic domestic policy*, I can see why Time thought he was irrelevant now.  He did make "man of the year before" I think, and then blew it.
Aye, and look where his "influence" got us now
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|6653|Washington, DC

Did Sanjaya Malakar make it there?
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6491
Most are in no way influential.

The Queen? Aside from being more German than English she has no power

Kate Moss? All she was, is and will ever be is a crack whore

Rosie is just another fat rich white man with to much time on his hands

But @ not including Bush, he is just Cheney's pawn and so he has no true influence either.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6794|PNW

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

Most are in no way influential.

The Queen? Aside from being more German than English she has no power

Kate Moss? All she was, is and will ever be is a crack whore

Rosie is just another fat rich white man with to much time on his hands

But @ not including Bush, he is just Cheney's pawn and so he has no true influence either.
I assume he isn't on there either, so it's the same thing.
thanks_champ
Member
+19|6545
There is a difference between powerful and influential.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6584

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

NEW YORK - Heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio and envelope-pushers Rosie O'Donnell and Sacha Baron Cohen are among the entertainment newsmakers on Time magazine's list of 100 people who shape the world.

The list of 100 most influential, on newsstands Friday, also includes Queen Elizabeth II, presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, director Martin Scorsese and model Kate Moss. It does not include President Bush.

Cont'd: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_ … le_time100
So a man with access to the red phone and button, even if he stumbles over words and invents a few new ones, is less influential than, say, Barack Obama?
Were any of his staff included?
Sanjaya
Banned
+40|6249
Fair and balanced because they don't included Bush's bumbling every year to give someone else a chance in? Seems fair to me.
Ender2309
has joined the GOP
+470|6594|USA

Sanjaya wrote:

Fair and balanced because they don't included Bush's bumbling every year to give someone else a chance in? Seems fair to me.
you support affirmative action, don't you?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard