Kotaku, Joystiq and N4G tbh.Flecco wrote:
Thanks Pissydon.Poseidon wrote:
Dunno if it's been posted buuuuuuuuut:
http://kotaku.com/5190003/operation-fla … ay-footage
Shit bro you always get the best gaming info. Should be like the newsmaster of Other Titles or summat innit wot m8.
This. The PC version is $40? That usually means it's gonna suck on the PC.Mutantsteak wrote:
It will beBradt3hleader wrote:
Hope it's not too consoly...
Well, from personal experience, which isn't much TBH, is that things were always less fast paced. I'm thinking also about COD4 how you can't DL anything good for it on an XBOX360. So no mods and all. Also in multiplayer I heard that xboxes are limited to 24 players. Imagine how that would be on OPF2's huge maps.csmag wrote:
I think hes talking about mods.FatherTed wrote:
How so?Bradt3hleader wrote:
Consoles are always limited content wise so I hope it won't be crap for the PC and we can have 100+ units like in ArmA.
Not trying to be obtuse, just wondering about your views on consoles as a whole.
Yeah but ofp2 and ArmA are focused on Co-op. Have you ever played ArmA in co-op online? 2 players is enough for a kickass game, let alone 24.Bradt3hleader wrote:
Well, from personal experience, which isn't much TBH, is that things were always less fast paced. I'm thinking also about COD4 how you can't DL anything good for it on an XBOX360. So no mods and all. Also in multiplayer I heard that xboxes are limited to 24 players. Imagine how that would be on OPF2's huge maps.csmag wrote:
I think hes talking about mods.FatherTed wrote:
How so?
Not trying to be obtuse, just wondering about your views on consoles as a whole.
Most of my information regarding the subject is what some reputated people over at TGN.
Ahhh right gotcha.Bradt3hleader wrote:
Well, from personal experience, which isn't much TBH, is that things were always less fast paced. I'm thinking also about COD4 how you can't DL anything good for it on an XBOX360. So no mods and all. Also in multiplayer I heard that xboxes are limited to 24 players. Imagine how that would be on OPF2's huge maps.csmag wrote:
I think hes talking about mods.FatherTed wrote:
How so?
Not trying to be obtuse, just wondering about your views on consoles as a whole.
Most of my information regarding the subject is what some reputated people over at TGN.
That´s not what I meant. I mean a bad port of the controls technical-wise. Take MoH:Airborne. Impossible to move the mouse accurately. It´s some sort of weird acceleration or whatever.M.O.A.B wrote:
I don't see any problem with the controls for a console, like a keyboard and mouse you practice and you learn how to use it.Sisco10 wrote:
You mean apart from horribly inaccurate controls and unfair game-time stretching mechanics? Nothing really...henno13 wrote:
http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/967/967634p1.html
it sounds if you use your imagination
Whats so bad about that?
All three versions are to be identical in terms of content and length.
Last edited by Sisco10 (2009-03-30 13:10:58)
Last edited by henno13 (2009-03-31 08:17:54)
Maybe it was filmed on consolesM.O.A.B wrote:
But is it just me, or do some of the GFX and models in terms of detail not seem to match those of the previous screens?
Oh yeah, its still looks awsm. But I'm wondering if that was made in lowered GFX and not full performance. The consoles would still be able to produce higher GFX than those in the vid. Killzone 2 being one example.henno13 wrote:
Maybe it was filmed on consolesM.O.A.B wrote:
But is it just me, or do some of the GFX and models in terms of detail not seem to match those of the previous screens?
It still looks great to me
Take into account that it is a 200sqkm open world rendered all at onceM.O.A.B wrote:
Oh yeah, its still looks awsm. But I'm wondering if that was made in lowered GFX and not full performance. The consoles would still be able to produce higher GFX than those in the vid. Killzone 2 being one example.henno13 wrote:
Maybe it was filmed on consolesM.O.A.B wrote:
But is it just me, or do some of the GFX and models in terms of detail not seem to match those of the previous screens?
It still looks great to me
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.henno13 wrote:
Take into account that it is a 200sqkm open world rendered all at onceM.O.A.B wrote:
Oh yeah, its still looks awsm. But I'm wondering if that was made in lowered GFX and not full performance. The consoles would still be able to produce higher GFX than those in the vid. Killzone 2 being one example.henno13 wrote:
Maybe it was filmed on consoles
It still looks great to me
They are still developing, Its not like they are finished and are making us wait for two months for the lulzM.O.A.B wrote:
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.henno13 wrote:
Take into account that it is a 200sqkm open world rendered all at onceM.O.A.B wrote:
Oh yeah, its still looks awsm. But I'm wondering if that was made in lowered GFX and not full performance. The consoles would still be able to produce higher GFX than those in the vid. Killzone 2 being one example.
Last edited by henno13 (2009-03-31 09:02:33)
That's looks very COD4ish I think. I'll watch it again though. It just didn't seem very mil-sim like it "Should" be right? Isn't this supposed to be a military simulator and be as realstic as possible? Also the physics of that body falling was pretty rag dolish.
Seems you could be right, was watching this vid. At 1:33 it shows the same shot of the Black Hawk firing as in that trailer, looks exactly the same footage but has WIP in the bottom left. Seems its more of a teaser trailer than a final trailer.henno13 wrote:
They are still developing, Its not like they are finished and are making us wait for two months for the lulzM.O.A.B wrote:
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.henno13 wrote:
Take into account that it is a 200sqkm open world rendered all at once
Take into account that the AI needs to be calculated for the hundreds of units roaming the island too.M.O.A.B wrote:
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.henno13 wrote:
Take into account that it is a 200sqkm open world rendered all at onceM.O.A.B wrote:
Oh yeah, its still looks awsm. But I'm wondering if that was made in lowered GFX and not full performance. The consoles would still be able to produce higher GFX than those in the vid. Killzone 2 being one example.
Maybe, but wouldn't that only apply to MP? Sp in the original game used to have enemies and allies in set locations (there about) where the mission would take place. Rather than having random units stationed throughout the gameworld alongside those needed for the mission.Sisco10 wrote:
Take into account that the AI needs to be calculated for the hundreds of units roaming the island too.M.O.A.B wrote:
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.henno13 wrote:
Take into account that it is a 200sqkm open world rendered all at once
No, it is also in SPM.O.A.B wrote:
Maybe, but wouldn't that only apply to MP? Sp in the original game used to have enemies and allies in set locations (there about) where the mission would take place. Rather than having random units stationed throughout the gameworld alongside those needed for the mission.Sisco10 wrote:
Take into account that the AI needs to be calculated for the hundreds of units roaming the island too.M.O.A.B wrote:
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2009-04-02 09:34:07)
Even if there were just the units for the current mission ("just" ranging from a dozen up to a few dozens on a Flashpoint scale), most of them are acting in real time. Only a small portion of the mission design is supposed to be scripted, thus making the battles different everytime you play. Acting and reacting to the players moves. Including the graphics needed to be calculated for all of them.M.O.A.B wrote:
Maybe, but wouldn't that only apply to MP? Sp in the original game used to have enemies and allies in set locations (there about) where the mission would take place. Rather than having random units stationed throughout the gameworld alongside those needed for the mission.Sisco10 wrote:
Take into account that the AI needs to be calculated for the hundreds of units roaming the island too.M.O.A.B wrote:
Tru, but I still think the GFX would be higher than those.
Last edited by Sisco10 (2009-04-02 09:47:12)
Weapons are customisable I believe. Everything needs to be assembled as well, so like attaching Javelin launcher to the fire control box etc. Everything you carry will be visible as well, weapons I'm sure of, mags not so sure. So you'd get your weapon/launcher on your back etc.Sisco10 wrote:
Even if there were just the units for the current mission ("just" ranging from a dozen up to a few dozens on a Flashpoint scale), most of them are acting in real time. Only a small portion of the mission design is supposed to be scripted, thus making the battles different everytime you play. Acting and reacting to the players moves. Including the graphics needed to be calculated for all of them.M.O.A.B wrote:
Maybe, but wouldn't that only apply to MP? Sp in the original game used to have enemies and allies in set locations (there about) where the mission would take place. Rather than having random units stationed throughout the gameworld alongside those needed for the mission.Sisco10 wrote:
Take into account that the AI needs to be calculated for the hundreds of units roaming the island too.
As for your weapon pic: Judging by the scopes, there are sniper rifles. Are the weapons supposed to be customizable? If so
A javelin is there too? Awesome!
You've got MP5's up the top left. Colt .45 beneath that. Guessing thats a QSZ-92 to the right of it. Above that are Type 05 smg's. To the right of those are variants of the SCAR-L and below thsoe the SCAR-H. To the right of those are the QBZ-95 rifles, below those look to be Type 81s. To the right are the M4 and its variants and to the right of those are the M16A4's.FatherTed wrote:
someone id all them guns if you'd be so kind.
There's an M21 I know of, and the SAW. No idea if it has an MP7 or SA80, doubting the SA80.FatherTed wrote:
all i really want are M14's and SA80's.
Oh, and the M249 + MP7