lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ty wrote:


See that's your major problem Iowing you never think before you post. I suppose it's not a big step to not even read what you decide to comment on. Use your head man!
I already explained why I did not read it, there ARE NO good reasons to deny life liberty and happiness to an individual who has not denied yours.

If you don't like that, too bad.
Save the lecture for your kid, that is if you are even old enough to have any yourself.
Um... I think Ty would agree with you on the life, liberty and happiness thing.  That's kind of the point as to why the OP is sarcastic.
Sighhhhhhhh, yesssssss Turquoise I knowwwwwww it was sarcasm, if you go back and read you will see that I only posted based on the title, confident that there is no good reason for denial of gay marriage. I admitted this already.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

Ganko_06 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ganko_06 wrote:


He still hasn't read the post.  Some people just never get it...
Uhhhh yeah, I did read it, but it was after my initial comment.......do you "get it" now??
Yes I get the sarcasm of the post.  If you read my first post you would know that.
No, I don't understand the source of your generally cranky attitude.  Need a hug?
a hug from a toad???!!!......no thanks.
Ganko_06
Laughter with an S
+167|6895|Camoran's Paradise

lowing wrote:

Ganko_06 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Uhhhh yeah, I did read it, but it was after my initial comment.......do you "get it" now??
Yes I get the sarcasm of the post.  If you read my first post you would know that.
No, I don't understand the source of your generally cranky attitude.  Need a hug?
a hug from a toad???!!!......no thanks.
Just trying to be nice.

Last edited by Ganko_06 (2007-04-02 20:30:35)

Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6595|Twyford, UK
You forgot #13 through #15: God hates fags.

Although, frankly, the main reason it won't work is the same reason marriage in general has a tendency not to work out. When you spent decades with someone, you start to get sick of dealing with them.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

Skorpy-chan wrote:

You forgot #13 through #15: God hates fags.

Although, frankly, the main reason it won't work is the same reason marriage in general has a tendency not to work out. When you spent decades with someone, you start to get sick of dealing with them.
Everyone hush, ...........I think he is talking to me.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6695|The Land of Scott Walker

lowing wrote:

1 reason why it should be legal.......

An individuals right to pursue, life, liberty, and happiness

We have no right in infringe on this, unless you can tell me how a gay marriage infringes on YOUR pursuit to Life Liberty and Happiness.


and it really needs to be a good one.
Huh, I thought teh buttsecks was what they were pursuing, not marriage.  Perhaps I am mistaken.
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7025|Noizyland

lowing wrote:

Ganko_06 wrote:

lowing wrote:


I already explained why I did not read it, there ARE NO good reasons to deny life liberty and happiness to an individual who has not denied yours.

If you don't like that, too bad.
Save the lecture for your kid, that is if you are even old enough to have any yourself.
He still hasn't read the post.  Some people just never get it...
Uhhhh yeah, I did read it, but it was after my initial comment.......do you "get it" now??
At the risk of starting a flame-war, (sorry.)

In your initial comment you even quoted it though! You don't quote something unless you have read it man!
Anyway I do agree with you on the life, liberty, etc. thing, so don't worry about me disagreing with you as you are correct, but you can't post an adversarial response if you don't know what the real issues, (or non-issues,) are. I just think that it shows a certain ignorance when you comment without reading anything but the thread title, AND ACTUALLY QUOTE THE TEXT! Sorry to be frank, but it makes you look like a damn fool dude, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that.

Sorry sorry sorry, but as a moderator I don't get to speak my mind much. I don't want a flame war, but it needed to be said.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6655|North Carolina

Stingray24 wrote:

lowing wrote:

1 reason why it should be legal.......

An individuals right to pursue, life, liberty, and happiness

We have no right in infringe on this, unless you can tell me how a gay marriage infringes on YOUR pursuit to Life Liberty and Happiness.


and it really needs to be a good one.
Huh, I thought teh buttsecks was what they were pursuing, not marriage.  Perhaps I am mistaken.
*shrugs*  I'm straight, not pursuing marriage, and enjoy sex the regular way -- does that mean I shouldn't be able to marry someone if I had a change of heart?
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6883|USA
It is a known fact...People are fucking retarded.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6695|The Land of Scott Walker

Turquoise wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

lowing wrote:

1 reason why it should be legal.......

An individuals right to pursue, life, liberty, and happiness

We have no right in infringe on this, unless you can tell me how a gay marriage infringes on YOUR pursuit to Life Liberty and Happiness.


and it really needs to be a good one.
Huh, I thought teh buttsecks was what they were pursuing, not marriage.  Perhaps I am mistaken.
*shrugs*  I'm straight, not pursuing marriage, and enjoy sex the regular way -- does that mean I shouldn't be able to marry someone if I had a change of heart?
I don't think it's your heart that'd be changing.  To each his own.  Civil unions should be sufficient.  If it's for the "I want to make legal and medical decisions for my partner" reason, then they should see a lawyer and set up durable POA, living will, etc etc as even straight married couples must do.  Much easier than trying to force the issue with the marriage thing.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6655|North Carolina

Stingray24 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:


Huh, I thought teh buttsecks was what they were pursuing, not marriage.  Perhaps I am mistaken.
*shrugs*  I'm straight, not pursuing marriage, and enjoy sex the regular way -- does that mean I shouldn't be able to marry someone if I had a change of heart?
I don't think it's your heart that'd be changing.  To each his own.  Civil unions should be sufficient.  If it's for the "I want to make legal and medical decisions for my partner" reason, then they should see a lawyer and set up durable POA, living will, etc etc as even straight married couples must do.  Much easier than trying to force the issue with the marriage thing.
Agreed...  I just think marriage should be completely separated from government and completely substituted in government with civil unions.  Then, everybody's happy....
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6695|The Land of Scott Walker

Turquoise wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


*shrugs*  I'm straight, not pursuing marriage, and enjoy sex the regular way -- does that mean I shouldn't be able to marry someone if I had a change of heart?
I don't think it's your heart that'd be changing.  To each his own.  Civil unions should be sufficient.  If it's for the "I want to make legal and medical decisions for my partner" reason, then they should see a lawyer and set up durable POA, living will, etc etc as even straight married couples must do.  Much easier than trying to force the issue with the marriage thing.
Agreed...  I just think marriage should be completely separated from government and completely substituted in government with civil unions.  Then, everybody's happy....
Works for me.  The gay folks I'm acquainted with aren't interested in getting married.  The best manager I ever had was gay but he kept his preferences to himself and did not want to marry his partner, though they'd been together for years.  That's why this issue can get so confusing.
-=AudigyXi=-
Member
+18|6906
Im moving to canada
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6831|the dank(super) side of Oregon
when you consider how sacred straight marriage is in this country,  with 50% of them ending in divorce, I say, give the gay folks a shot, they probably couldn't to any worse.
Choclot
Member
+21|6793
Whats it like back in the 1920's over there? jokes, it seemed like your just saying its sarcasm when part of it sounds like you mean it...
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

Ty wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ganko_06 wrote:


He still hasn't read the post.  Some people just never get it...
Uhhhh yeah, I did read it, but it was after my initial comment.......do you "get it" now??
At the risk of starting a flame-war, (sorry.)

In your initial comment you even quoted it though! You don't quote something unless you have read it man!
Anyway I do agree with you on the life, liberty, etc. thing, so don't worry about me disagreing with you as you are correct, but you can't post an adversarial response if you don't know what the real issues, (or non-issues,) are. I just think that it shows a certain ignorance when you comment without reading anything but the thread title, AND ACTUALLY QUOTE THE TEXT! Sorry to be frank, but it makes you look like a damn fool dude, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that.

Sorry sorry sorry, but as a moderator I don't get to speak my mind much. I don't want a flame war, but it needed to be said.
LOL, all ready admitted to.......all ready explained.......I don't use the "quote" box to only quote, but also as a reference as to what I was responding to. In this case I was responding to the topic title, not the contents.

As for me "worrying" about if YOU or anyone else agrees with me, is that something you honestly think is even on my list of concerns let alone at the top of it? Is it lonely on that perch of yours??

Your continual harping on this, is obviously nothing more than an opportunistic notion on your part, to get your digs in on a member that you, and as I am lead to believe, the rest of the Jr. Geek Squad mod team do not like.


Time for you get over it, if you can, if not, have Mom call the doctor and get your Ritalin dose re-evaluated.
sorry sorry soory I don't get to respond to a moderator much I don't want a flame war, it was just something that needed to be said...........................DUDE!!!
joker3327
=IBF2=
+305|6849|Cheshire. UK
Jesus there are some fucking retards on this site......an obviously joke thread ..but tree hugging gay loving rabbit kissers get all high and mighty about the rights and wrongs.

TAKE A FUCKING CHILL PILL

Its a Joke ...its funny..... laugh it off.. or
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

joker3327 wrote:

Jesus there are some fucking retards on this site......an obviously joke thread ..but tree hugging gay loving rabbit kissers get all high and mighty about the rights and wrongs.

TAKE A FUCKING CHILL PILL

Its a Joke ...its funny..... laugh it off.. or
The irony here is...............YOU'RE handing out advice about taking "chill pills".
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6909|BC, Canada
lowing... just shut up already. I mean not just in this post, but in life in general.
joker3327
=IBF2=
+305|6849|Cheshire. UK
You would not know Irony if it ran up and hugged you!!

Anyway what makes you think the advice was for you are you in the Fucking retard group or just trolling around for another confrontation.
hurricane2oo5
Do One Ya Mug !!!
+176|7015|mansfield
the way i see it is - god created Adam and Eve , not Adam and Steve.

lol
joker3327
=IBF2=
+305|6849|Cheshire. UK

hurricane2oo5 wrote:

the way i see it is - god created Adam and Eve , not Adam and Steve.

lol
Or Madam and eve
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

joker3327 wrote:

You would not know Irony if it ran up and hugged you!!

Anyway what makes you think the advice was for you are you in the Fucking retard group or just trolling around for another confrontation.
Never said it was for me, I responded to your post the way I read it......Loud, obnoxious, and full of yelling and cussing as you tell everyone to "chill". Hence, the irony.
joker3327
=IBF2=
+305|6849|Cheshire. UK
Sorry did someone say something.......no thought not...
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6902|USA

Nicholas Langdon wrote:

lowing... just shut up already. I mean not just in this post, but in life in general.
lol, oh good another fan....let me guess based on your post.........................LIBERAL,, right????

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard