Poll

Should BF2s have a sig/graphics sub-forum?

Yes86%86% - 53
No13%13% - 8
Total: 61
Entertayner
Member
+826|6784

Well...

There could also be seperate mods just for that section.
[TUF]Whiskey_Oktober
mmmm...Toasty!
+91|6935|Oregon
totalgfx is cool. something like that here would be nifty as well.
NooBesT
Pizzahitler
+873|6682

Why not...?
https://i.imgur.com/S9bg2.png
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6945|St. Andrews / Oslo

NooBest, your sig is too tall nub.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
NooBesT
Pizzahitler
+873|6682

Jenspm wrote:

NooBest, your sig is too tall nub.
No it's not.
https://i.imgur.com/S9bg2.png
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6945|St. Andrews / Oslo

hacker.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6906
I say yes.
Toilet Sex
one love, one pig
+1,775|6785

Sounds like a good idea IMO
PhaxeNor
:D
+119|6629|Norway | Unkown
Yes here
Entertayner
Member
+826|6784

Who votes for a manhunt of whoever voted no?
Toilet Sex
one love, one pig
+1,775|6785

Entertayner wrote:

Who votes for a manhunt of whoever voted no?
Well whoever it was didn't leave a reason, so their vote is worthless methinks.
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6945|St. Andrews / Oslo

btw, yes.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Entertayner
Member
+826|6784

Toilet Sex wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

Who votes for a manhunt of whoever voted no?
Well whoever it was didn't leave a reason, so their vote is worthless methinks.
Here, here.
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6945|St. Andrews / Oslo

Toilet Sex wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

Who votes for a manhunt of whoever voted no?
Well whoever it was didn't leave a reason, so their vote is worthless methinks.
QFT
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
NooBesT
Pizzahitler
+873|6682

Jenspm wrote:

Toilet Sex wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

Who votes for a manhunt of whoever voted no?
Well whoever it was didn't leave a reason, so their vote is worthless methinks.
QFT
But that doesn't mean we can't kill him! (or her)
https://i.imgur.com/S9bg2.png
l41e
Member
+677|6861

Yes. Would clear out half the spam in the junk drawer, for one.

@NooBesT: Indeed it is too big. 268 > 250.
NooBesT
Pizzahitler
+873|6682

k30dxedle wrote:

Yes. Would clear out half the spam in the junk drawer, for one.

@NooBesT: Indeed it is too big. 268 > 250.
The image itself isn't over 250...
https://i.imgur.com/S9bg2.png
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|6951|The Hague, Netherlands

NooBesT[FiN] wrote:

k30dxedle wrote:

Yes. Would clear out half the spam in the junk drawer, for one.

@NooBesT: Indeed it is too big. 268 > 250.
The image itself isn't over 250...
total height of your sig(s) should be under 250px,
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
jimmanycricket
EBC Member
+56|6868|Cambridge, England

NooBesT[FiN] wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

NooBest, your sig is too tall nub.
No it's not.
Yeh it is...
NooBesT
Pizzahitler
+873|6682

You are going off topic!
(I'll edit it you damn nazis...)
https://i.imgur.com/S9bg2.png
Slickdawg8
Visit TAW.NET
+58|6991|Long Island
i say yes...it would be cool.
R3v4n
We shall beat to quarters!
+433|6700|Melbourne

Hell yes.
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
MDFSpacePhantom
It is I
+146|6597|San Jose CA.
It would be nice....
RavyGravy
Son.
+617|6619|NSW, Australia

NooBesT[FiN] wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

Toilet Sex wrote:


Well whoever it was didn't leave a reason, so their vote is worthless methinks.
QFT
But that doesn't mean we can't kill him! (or her)
i voted no
R3v4n
We shall beat to quarters!
+433|6700|Melbourne

Why?
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard