rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059
Is it me or are the graphics in BF2 better than the ones in BF2142. I'm talking over level design and complexity of the textures. Does anybody think that BF2 had more realistic buildings, trees, vehicles, ect..?
l41e
Member
+677|7025

..."realistic" games generally aren't set in time periods we have no idea about.
rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059
ok then i guess we can judge based on two things then.

Design = BF2 wins in my opinion (no cheesy graphics like cartoons)

Graphical detail = BF2 wins in my opion also
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6944|NYC / Hamburg

I find that the graphics are better in BF2142 than in BF2. Are you comparing the 2 on the same settings, otherwise it would hardly be a fair test.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Buzerk1
Member
+44|7213
Graphic are better in BF2142... just in NS, to see the smoke coming out of the mouth of other players is nice.
rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059
both on a X2 3800+ at 2.4ghz 2gigs RAM, 8800gts640, same in game settings.
l41e
Member
+677|7025

Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059
I have. levels like Marshur City,Sharqi Peninsula, Dragon Valley have the best graphics i think.
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|6940|British Columbia, Canada
There on the same engine so the graphics cant be that much better...

k30dxedle wrote:

Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
Maybe not in Vanilla BF2.. Ever played any Mods?
l41e
Member
+677|7025

LT.Victim wrote:

There on the same engine so the graphics cant be that much better...

k30dxedle wrote:

Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
Maybe not in Vanilla BF2.. Ever played any Mods?
Yeah. OPK, PR, POE2.
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|6942|Area 51
With me:
BF2 maxed out: 50-60 FPS
BF2142 Maxed out: 30-40 FPS

Meaning BF2142 is a heavier game -> Better graphics.

(Both on 32 player servers, with a similar ping)
r2zoo
Knowledge is power, guard it well
+126|6973|Michigan, USA
Same Engine=Same Graphics, their the same, boils down to opinion.
Cerberus666
Member
+4|6931
They use the same engine, but there's more code in BF2142 which is why framerates are lower on the same settings. Im not too sure but i think more code means 'better' graphics, but its entirely opinionated.

Besides, BF2 is far more realistic, and i doubt we'll have plasma pistols and hover tanks in less than 150 years...
rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059
i have a friend that agrees that the graphics in bf2142 suck and that the weapons suck too.
RavyGravy
Son.
+617|6783|NSW, Australia

2142 graphics are much better
ReDevilJR
Member
+106|6728
Baur FTW!
rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059
you guys must be blind then
RavyGravy
Son.
+617|6783|NSW, Australia

no, your grahpics must be set to low then
jimmanycricket
EBC Member
+56|7032|Cambridge, England
pff, maby the textures are slightly better in 2142 (i personally dont think so) but 2142's models really suck. They are really low poly and ugly.
Raptor1
Member
+19|6865

LT.Victim wrote:

There on the same engine so the graphics cant be that much better...

k30dxedle wrote:

Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
Maybe not in Vanilla BF2.. Ever played any Mods?
the booster and expansion packs
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|7070
I have to play on low settings . I guess 2142 has better graphics, but it is less realistic.
Ninja_Monkey
I TK For Blackhawks
+60|6942|UK

rig0rm0rti5 wrote:

i have a friend that agrees that the graphics in bf2142 suck and that the weapons suck too.
if u have a friend let alone one that agrees your a winner
RavyGravy
Son.
+617|6783|NSW, Australia

Superior Mind wrote:

I have to play on low settings . I guess 2142 has better graphics, but it is less realistic.
in some ways its even more realistic than bf2 which is just sad.
rig0rm0rti5
Member
+1|7059

jimmanycricket wrote:

pff, maby the textures are slightly better in 2142 (i personally dont think so) but 2142's models really suck. They are really low poly and ugly.
Here is somebody who agrees with me.
l41e
Member
+677|7025

So basically you're just trying to jump on the "zomg 2142 is t3h suxx0r n00b" bandwagon (except several months late), packing it up as a "question", and ignoring all responses which don't agree with you.

Way to go.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard