Is it me or are the graphics in BF2 better than the ones in BF2142. I'm talking over level design and complexity of the textures. Does anybody think that BF2 had more realistic buildings, trees, vehicles, ect..?
..."realistic" games generally aren't set in time periods we have no idea about.
ok then i guess we can judge based on two things then.
Design = BF2 wins in my opinion (no cheesy graphics like cartoons)
Graphical detail = BF2 wins in my opion also
Design = BF2 wins in my opinion (no cheesy graphics like cartoons)
Graphical detail = BF2 wins in my opion also
I find that the graphics are better in BF2142 than in BF2. Are you comparing the 2 on the same settings, otherwise it would hardly be a fair test.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Graphic are better in BF2142... just in NS, to see the smoke coming out of the mouth of other players is nice.
both on a X2 3800+ at 2.4ghz 2gigs RAM, 8800gts640, same in game settings.
Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
I have. levels like Marshur City,Sharqi Peninsula, Dragon Valley have the best graphics i think.
There on the same engine so the graphics cant be that much better...
Maybe not in Vanilla BF2.. Ever played any Mods?k30dxedle wrote:
Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
Yeah. OPK, PR, POE2.LT.Victim wrote:
There on the same engine so the graphics cant be that much better...Maybe not in Vanilla BF2.. Ever played any Mods?k30dxedle wrote:
Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
With me:
BF2 maxed out: 50-60 FPS
BF2142 Maxed out: 30-40 FPS
Meaning BF2142 is a heavier game -> Better graphics.
(Both on 32 player servers, with a similar ping)
BF2 maxed out: 50-60 FPS
BF2142 Maxed out: 30-40 FPS
Meaning BF2142 is a heavier game -> Better graphics.
(Both on 32 player servers, with a similar ping)
Same Engine=Same Graphics, their the same, boils down to opinion.
They use the same engine, but there's more code in BF2142 which is why framerates are lower on the same settings. Im not too sure but i think more code means 'better' graphics, but its entirely opinionated.
Besides, BF2 is far more realistic, and i doubt we'll have plasma pistols and hover tanks in less than 150 years...
Besides, BF2 is far more realistic, and i doubt we'll have plasma pistols and hover tanks in less than 150 years...
i have a friend that agrees that the graphics in bf2142 suck and that the weapons suck too.
2142 graphics are much better
Baur FTW!
you guys must be blind then
no, your grahpics must be set to low then
pff, maby the textures are slightly better in 2142 (i personally dont think so) but 2142's models really suck. They are really low poly and ugly.
the booster and expansion packsLT.Victim wrote:
There on the same engine so the graphics cant be that much better...Maybe not in Vanilla BF2.. Ever played any Mods?k30dxedle wrote:
Ever seen any snow or rain in BF2? Didn't think so.
I have to play on low settings . I guess 2142 has better graphics, but it is less realistic.
if u have a friend let alone one that agrees your a winnerrig0rm0rti5 wrote:
i have a friend that agrees that the graphics in bf2142 suck and that the weapons suck too.
in some ways its even more realistic than bf2 which is just sad.Superior Mind wrote:
I have to play on low settings . I guess 2142 has better graphics, but it is less realistic.
Here is somebody who agrees with me.jimmanycricket wrote:
pff, maby the textures are slightly better in 2142 (i personally dont think so) but 2142's models really suck. They are really low poly and ugly.
So basically you're just trying to jump on the "zomg 2142 is t3h suxx0r n00b" bandwagon (except several months late), packing it up as a "question", and ignoring all responses which don't agree with you.
Way to go.
Way to go.