BF2S Forums What would you do. (read link first then vote)

Oh for fucks sake.......SOMEONE just push the button already.....blow the shitta outta each other,better yet completely nuke each other and let the world get along without any more of your fanatical war-mongoring BS!
Im so fkn sick of this eternal crap these two countries have,either fight it out and c who is left standing or come to peace...LOL

herrr_smity wrote:

grate let Israel once again show to the world that they are a despotic regime, that dose ecstasy as they please.

look at me i from Israel if you appose me your anti Semitic and evil

This is what im talking about...fuken nutters!!

You can tell it's a good poll when almost all the options are tied - GJ!  +1

Hawk390 wrote:

Oh the jews.......tsk tsk tsk. I love how if Iran makes nuclear power plants there making bombs, and need to be blown the fuck up, but when north korea did it, everyone was.......oh ok, small dudes made a bomb, lets just give em billions in aid to stop. Ahh gotta love the jews */sarcasm*

Perhaps if Iran wouldn't brag about how they're gonna wipe Israel off the face of the Earth, more people'd believe them.

U.N. calls U.S. data on Iran's nuclear aims unreliable

"VIENNA — Although international concern is growing about Iran's nuclear program and its regional ambitions, diplomats here say most U.S. intelligence shared with the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency has proved inaccurate and none has led to significant discoveries inside Iran.

The officials said the CIA and other Western spy services had provided sensitive information to the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency at least since 2002, when Iran's long-secret nuclear program was exposed. But none of the tips about supposed secret weapons sites provided clear evidence that the Islamic Republic was developing illicit weapons.

"Since 2002, pretty much all the intelligence that's come to us has proved to be wrong," a senior diplomat at the IAEA said. Another official here described the agency's intelligence stream as "very cold now" because "so little panned out."

...

The CIA still faces harsh criticism for its prewar intelligence errors on Iraq. No one here argues that U.S. intelligence officials have fallen this time for crudely forged documents or pushed shoddy analysis. IAEA officials, who openly challenged U.S. assessments that Saddam Hussein was developing a nuclear bomb, say the Americans are much more cautious in assessing Iran."

Iraq 2003 revisited?

How is it the US's decision? It would be the decision of the Iraqi government that the US is constantly telling us is not just a puppet regime. I can't imagine any legitimately elected government taking a course of action that is so obviously contrary to the wishes of its people.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-02-25 09:18:55)

iamangry wrote:

Pubic wrote:

iamangry wrote:

Edit: P.S. If you all are really into cheap and affordable power that doesn't pollute the environment, why aren't you contributing to any of the various projects dealing in nuclear fusion.  You have access to the Persian gulf, which would give you an inexhaustible supply of Deuterium and Tritium with which you could sustain your people's energy needs indefinitely.  Oh, but you can't make a bomb with only fusion, right?  Even the most sophisticated fusion bombs have fissile cores.  And there's another good reason as to how we all know that you are talking out your asses when you say you want nuclear power, not nuclear weapons.

Do you honestly think Iran would be allowed into that project????

Why would you think otherwise?  Have the Iranians tried in any way?  Have any of the member nations working on it said anything regarding it?

Also because there has never been an effective nuclear fusion power source developed, nor is it likely we will see one in our lifetimes.

Talk about running before you can walk.

as soon as someone attacks iran, world war 3 will start. I dont think you people realize how much shit will go off if someone lets off a nuke.

Bertster7 wrote:

d4rkst4r wrote:

as soon as someone attacks iran, world war 3 will start. I dont think you people realize how much shit will go off if someone lets off a nuke.

Who'll be letting off nukes? I suppose Israel could, it fits their modus operandi to a tee - if that happened it is likely that the state of Israel would cease to exist soon after.

At the current rate Iran won't even have the capability to make nukes for about 10 years. They don't have enough centrifuges. The Iran situation isn't as pressing as people think.

You hope so, so do I. But that isn't the reality. Somethings going to happen soon, I bet. Israel will attack but it wont use nukes. The only way it will is if Iran goes chemical or nuclear on them.

Bertster7 wrote:

iamangry wrote:

Pubic wrote:

Do you honestly think Iran would be allowed into that project????

Why would you think otherwise?  Have the Iranians tried in any way?  Have any of the member nations working on it said anything regarding it?

Also because there has never been an effective nuclear fusion power source developed, nor is it likely we will see one in our lifetimes.

Talk about running before you can walk.

If you live 10 more years, there will be.  ITER will be the first energy producing fusion reactor.  The fact that a successful fusion power source has not been developed should be incentive for the Iranians, who could claim participation in something that helped the entire world (for once, goddamn islamofascists and their unwillingness to contribute to the world's research efforts) which would increase international opinion of them significantly.  But seriously, unless you're in your 70's, you will see a fusion power plant by the time you die.

Talk about speaking on subjects before knowing about them... and you come from Britain even, the home of JET, the largest nuclear fusion reactor in existence.   Tisk tisk.

rawls2 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

d4rkst4r wrote:

as soon as someone attacks iran, world war 3 will start. I dont think you people realize how much shit will go off if someone lets off a nuke.

Who'll be letting off nukes? I suppose Israel could, it fits their modus operandi to a tee - if that happened it is likely that the state of Israel would cease to exist soon after.

At the current rate Iran won't even have the capability to make nukes for about 10 years. They don't have enough centrifuges. The Iran situation isn't as pressing as people think.

You hope so, so do I. But that isn't the reality. Somethings going to happen soon, I bet. Israel will attack but it wont use nukes. The only way it will is if Iran goes chemical or nuclear on them.

Hope has nothing to do with it. The IAEA have had plenty of access to their sites until quite recently, where cooperation dropped off a bit, and know the potential of their centrifuges capabilities. Even the most alarmist estimates based on the data the IAEA have collected indicate that Iran will not have the potential to build even one bomb for at least 5 years. They just won't have enough enriched Uranium to do it. Building a bomb is easy, refining the fissile materials to build it with is the long, hard, expensive part (and delivery systems, they're expensive and complex too - or if you wanted to trigger a fusion reaction with your initial fission reaction, that's tricky).

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-02-25 11:25:07)

I don't buy the story. It is unable to be confirmed. It uses terms like " a Senior military official", no real names.