Now thats sad shite...ferrari and porsche made in the US?!I_SUCK_999 wrote:
Without America there would probably not be Ferrari or Porsche !!! now that would be sad.
Actually, they're names.Superglueman wrote:
Now thats sad shite...ferrari and porsche made in the US?!I_SUCK_999 wrote:
Without America there would probably not be Ferrari or Porsche !!! now that would be sad.
Why are they both ITALIAN words then?
The point was that they would still be produced without the US, being produced(almost all) in Italy.DonFck wrote:
Actually, they're names.Superglueman wrote:
Now thats sad shite...ferrari and porsche made in the US?!I_SUCK_999 wrote:
Without America there would probably not be Ferrari or Porsche !!! now that would be sad.
Why are they both ITALIAN words then?
Enzo Ferrari (Italian)
Ferdinand Porsche (German)
And the Porsche Boxter is "Made in Finland!"
Just a sidenote..
Hah. Not all of us are morbid fat factories. Just 75% of the people I see around, and that low only because I live next to a shit load of military bases.Major.League.Infidel wrote:
Go Pick a Fight with that Dog. Perhaps a Devil Dog?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
The big, bad, donut-snarfing-obese, undereducated McDonald's dog.theelviscerator wrote:
The explanation for anti-amercanism is this fundamental law of human behavior.
Mediocrity attacks excellence.
this thread is undeniable proof of it.
THE USA IS THE GREATEST, richest, most powerful country on earth.
All the little dogs yapping at the heels of the big bad dog.
http://www.alamoflag.com/alamoflag/Imag … s_full.jpg
EDIT: Pic added.
Japan has become enough of a financial partner of the US that I'd trust them with nukes. Why would they bomb the people who buy all their gadgets and animation?sergeriver wrote:
Not a rehorical question at all, and you are not answering it. Explain me why a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous than a nuclear US. Who decides that? Why can certain Nations have Nuclear weapons and Japan can't? US is the only country that dropped the bomb so far. How does this fact make US a more reliable country than Japan? Maybe this is an obvious question for you, but for normal people it is not.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Compare the Japanese system of government, values, and policies to those before and after World War 2. The answer to your question is so obvious one might mistake it for being rhetorical.sergeriver wrote:
Why would be a nuclear Japan more dangerous than a nuclear US? At the time the only country that dropped the bomb is US.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-02-22 05:16:40)
I'll step off topic again.. but just this once.Superglueman wrote:
The point was that they would still be produced without the US, being produced(almost all) in Italy.DonFck wrote:
Actually, they're names.Superglueman wrote:
Now thats sad shite...ferrari and porsche made in the US?!
Why are they both ITALIAN words then?
Enzo Ferrari (Italian)
Ferdinand Porsche (German)
And the Porsche Boxter is "Made in Finland!"
Just a sidenote..
Did you know Italian highway cops have Lamborghini contach's?
sergeriver wrote:
Not a rehorical question at all, and you are not answering it. Explain me why a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous than a nuclear US. Who decides that? Why can certain Nations have Nuclear weapons and Japan can't? US is the only country that dropped the bomb so far. How does this fact make US a more reliable country than Japan? Maybe this is an obvious question for you, but for normal people it is not.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Compare the Japanese system of government, values, and policies to those before and after World War 2. The answer to your question is so obvious one might mistake it for being rhetorical.sergeriver wrote:
Why would be a nuclear Japan more dangerous than a nuclear US? At the time the only country that dropped the bomb is US.
Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2007-02-22 05:35:15)
Hmmmm, I read the link as: www.18Naughtystreet.com and so on..... dissapointing.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
http://www.18doughtystreet.com/on_demand/165
This puts things into perspective for countries that are insignificant on the world scale, yet offer a not so insignificant amount of hating and criticism.
Also, denim jeans.
Discuss.
You are right. My fault. A country acting like an empire and actively expanding or invading other countries is very dangerous.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
Not a rehorical question at all, and you are not answering it. Explain me why a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous than a nuclear US. Who decides that? Why can certain Nations have Nuclear weapons and Japan can't? US is the only country that dropped the bomb so far. How does this fact make US a more reliable country than Japan? Maybe this is an obvious question for you, but for normal people it is not.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Compare the Japanese system of government, values, and policies to those before and after World War 2. The answer to your question is so obvious one might mistake it for being rhetorical.
First, where are you getting this question from? No one said a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous in the first place (even though it arguably would be). It's like you made up a post in your head to respond to. Second, now that you did bring it up, I went ahead provided the answer, but for some reason you're still asking the same question. Again, Japan was an empire during that era that was actively expanding into China as well as allied with Nazi Germany.
Lol, we have drugs? Great. And the capital of Argentina is Bogota.usmarine2007 wrote:
Viva Argentina and their drugs.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-02-22 05:41:10)
It's actually called ignorance.CameronPoe wrote:
I love usmarine's unashamed racial stereotyping. It's fantastic.
Everything is not black and white. Imperial Japan was much different than whatever empire you perceive the US to be today. And I guess allying with Nazi Germany is nothing to worry about either, right? You might think so because Argentina sympathized and gave asylum to the Nazis, but such is not the case.sergeriver wrote:
You are right. My fault. A country acting like an empire and actively expanding or invading other countries is very dangerous.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
Not a rehorical question at all, and you are not answering it. Explain me why a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous than a nuclear US. Who decides that? Why can certain Nations have Nuclear weapons and Japan can't? US is the only country that dropped the bomb so far. How does this fact make US a more reliable country than Japan? Maybe this is an obvious question for you, but for normal people it is not.
First, where are you getting this question from? No one said a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous in the first place (even though it arguably would be). It's like you made up a post in your head to respond to. Second, now that you did bring it up, I went ahead provided the answer, but for some reason you're still asking the same question. Again, Japan was an empire during that era that was actively expanding into China as well as allied with Nazi Germany.
It's actually more like childishness. It shows a distinct lack of maturity.sergeriver wrote:
It's actually called ignorance.CameronPoe wrote:
I love usmarine's unashamed racial stereotyping. It's fantastic.
Lol, retaliation posts.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Everything is not black and white. Imperial Japan was much different than whatever empire you perceive the US to be today. And I guess allying with Nazi Germany is nothing to worry about either, right? You might think so because Argentina sympathized and gave asylum to the Nazis, but such is not the case.sergeriver wrote:
You are right. My fault. A country acting like an empire and actively expanding or invading other countries is very dangerous.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
First, where are you getting this question from? No one said a nuclear Japan would be more dangerous in the first place (even though it arguably would be). It's like you made up a post in your head to respond to. Second, now that you did bring it up, I went ahead provided the answer, but for some reason you're still asking the same question. Again, Japan was an empire during that era that was actively expanding into China as well as allied with Nazi Germany.
What debate?CameronPoe wrote:
I love usmarine's unashamed racial stereotyping. It's fantastic. Annoyed with a debate - skip to the lowest common denominator - W00T!
Get over yourself young man. This coming from someone who supports Castro and says Cuban people are better off than Americans.CameronPoe wrote:
It's actually more like childishness. It shows a distinct lack of maturity.sergeriver wrote:
It's actually called ignorance.CameronPoe wrote:
I love usmarine's unashamed racial stereotyping. It's fantastic.
You missed the 's.usmarine2007 wrote:
What debate?CameronPoe wrote:
I love usmarine's unashamed racial stereotyping. It's fantastic. Annoyed with a debate - skip to the lowest common denominator - W00T!
Hard to debate the same old "my country is better than yours" BS.sergeriver wrote:
words
I wanted to debate the other hypothetical situation but you closed the thread.DonFck wrote:
At least try to keep this discussion on a debate-lavel. More good argumentation of this hypothetical situation, less flaming. Now. Please.
Take words out of my mouth again. I don't fully support Castro and am highly ciritical of his curbs on the freedom of speech and I NEVER EVER said that Cubans were better off than Americans - only an idiot would say something like that.usmarine2007 wrote:
Get over yourself young man. This coming from someone who supports Castro and says Cuban people are better off than Americans.CameronPoe wrote:
It's actually more like childishness. It shows a distinct lack of maturity.sergeriver wrote:
It's actually called ignorance.
usmarine2007 wrote:
BS.sergeriver wrote:
words
