Poll

If Iran invaded Saudi Arabia, who would you choose to fight for?

Saudi Arabia,34%34% - 31
Iran6%6% - 6
nobody57%57% - 51
don't know1%1% - 1
Total: 89
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7007|SE London

What the fuck would Iran do to Saudi Arabia?

The Saudi Arabian Army is much larger and much, much better equiped than the Iranians. Iran wouldn't stand a chance in a war with the Saudis.

Both countries have equally strong ties to terrorism, but the quality of life for Saudis is significantly lower than for Iranians. Iran has a much more progressive regime than the extremist Saudi royalty. Saudi Arabias human rights record is much worse than Irans too. All in all the Saudis seem far worse to me than the Iranians, but of course they are close allies of the West, because we want to buy their oil.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker

mcgid1 wrote:

I think I'd prefer nobody, but if Iran actually did try that you know that it would take the US all of five nano seconds to head to the Saudi's aid.  Too much of that black stuff at stake for them to do anything else.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather have the Saudis on control of that oil versus Iran.
Recoil555
A God Amongst Men
+26|6878|UK

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Honestly, what was Jesus thinking when he put all our oil in the middle east?
He lived in the middle east ? besides jesus didnt put oil anywhere.

Last edited by Recoil555 (2007-01-27 08:05:44)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7007|SE London

Stingray24 wrote:

mcgid1 wrote:

I think I'd prefer nobody, but if Iran actually did try that you know that it would take the US all of five nano seconds to head to the Saudi's aid.  Too much of that black stuff at stake for them to do anything else.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather have the Saudis on control of that oil versus Iran.
Why?
Ganko_06
Laughter with an S
+167|7071|Camoran's Paradise
Wait a minute. Has anyone thought this through?!  How the hell is Iran going to invade Saudi Arabia?  They arent border sharing neighbors.  Looks at what's between them.  IRAQ.  Do you really think the US is going to let Iran prance through Iraq to invade Saudi Arabia?

Last edited by Ganko_06 (2007-01-27 08:25:16)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7100|Canberra, AUS

usmarine2007 wrote:

Spark wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

Didn't Bush fly a load of Saudis out of the US on 9/12 in a private jet? Only the best of air travel for Bush Sr's friends.
Seriously if someone killed 3000 of my countries citizens I would want to talk and hold on to the family and friends of the guy who set it up? No?
Including members of hte bin Laden family.
I think that is what he meant.  Anyway, the plane was leased by the Saudis thru NetJets.....Bush did not pay for it.
I know he meant that, but I needed to clarify it (or so I felt). The main thing is there was a ban on air travel in those days - why did they, who should've been held for questioning, get such special privileges?

Last edited by Spark (2007-01-27 20:04:11)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
iamangry
Member
+59|7071|The United States of America

CameronPoe wrote:

Why on earth would you want to get involved in that?????? I'm surprised at the Saudi votes actually, given that it was mainly Saudis who killed 3000 US citizens on September 11th 2001.
Now here's something where you and I can agree on.

If we take your point of view, letting the Iranians and Saudis obliterate each other gives us unfettered access to their oil

If we take my point of view, letting the Iranians and Saudis obliterate each other draws the rest of the middle east into one big slug fest, and they stop caring about us for the moment, giving us time to pull our pants up and get serious domestically.  You know times are good when your enemies are fighting each other :p
JimmyBotswana
Member
+82|7011|Montreal
Why would any of us go fight for one of those countries unless we are of Saudi or Iranian heritage, and even then I could imagine people staying put. Let them fight over there like idiots. Both of them need to be reminded just how pathetic they are as countries.
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6919|Connecticut

Pubic wrote:

Nobody; let them duke it out unless my country is seriously at risk.
Malloy must go
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7007|SE London

JimmyBotswana wrote:

Let them fight over there like idiots. Both of them need to be reminded just how pathetic they are as countries.
Not at all.

Treating them like cunts won't get us anywhere. We need to get them onside. The Saudis are already, but still use Sharia law etc. the Iranians aren't, but there is much more likelihood of reform in Iran.

With Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Israel onside, the middle east suddenly would be a lot calmer. Everyone could just focus on peace in Israel.
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7072

Recoil555 wrote:

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Honestly, what was Jesus thinking when he put all our oil in the middle east?
He lived in the middle east ? besides jesus didnt put oil anywhere.
Pretty sure the bible proves you 110% wrong. It's prolly in Psalms somewhere.
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7269|Reykjavík, Iceland.
Saudi Arabia, because Iran invaded.


defend Iran against the country that spawned the majority of the 9/11 hijackers
So the whole of Ireland is a bunch of terrorists because of the IRA?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina
I'll go with Saudi Arabia...  again, defending countries from being invaded is fine.  Invading countries yourself is not.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7069
The United States...


this is a juvenile question and i shouldnt even be posting in this thread but i am so i guess im retarded

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard