Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7027|132 and Bush

https://i10.tinypic.com/3yy2r60.jpg
LONDON (Reuters) - British police arrested five men in northern England under the country's security laws in two separate operations on Tuesday.

Last November, the country's domestic spy chief said Muslim militants were plotting at least 30 major terrorist attacks in Britain.

Two men, aged 25 and 29, were arrested at separate locations in the city of Halifax by detectives from London's Counter- Terrorism Command and local officers, a police statement said.

"This is not about bomb-making or planting bombs," a police source said, adding the men were suspected of being involved in logistical work.

The source said the operation was not linked to any other investigation or the attack on July 7, 2005, when four British Islamists blew themselves up on three London underground trains and a bus, killing 52 people.

Three other men held on Tuesday were arrested as part of a separate operation by detectives in Manchester on suspicion of "terrorist support and facilitation".

"At this stage, there is no intelligence of any planned terrorist activity in the UK and the arrests are part of an ongoing investigation," Manchester Police said in a statement.

A police source said the operation was believed to be linked to the disappearance of a terrorism suspect who had absconded after being placed under a control order.

The man, a British citizen who had been living in Manchester, vanished earlier in the month just days after he was put under the order which sets strict conditions on a suspect's movements.

Anti-terrorism officers have made hundreds of arrests under security laws since the September 11 attacks on the United States.

Eliza Manningham-Buller, head of the MI5 security service, said young British Muslims were being groomed to become suicide bombers and her agents were tracking some 1,600 suspects, most of whom were British-born and linked to al Qaeda in Pakistan.

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-23 14:00:22)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7008|SE London

Step in the right direction.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7027|132 and Bush

Bertster7 wrote:

Step in the right direction.
I wonder are they given the presumption of innocence over there?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7008|SE London

Kmarion wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Step in the right direction.
I wonder are they given the presumption of innocence over there?
Of course. I get your point, but making arrests is still a good sign. They sound like they've worked long and hard on a lot of intelligence to make those arrests, which I think is the right thing to be doing.

Much better than shooting random Brazilians in the street, certainly.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7027|132 and Bush

Bertster7 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Step in the right direction.
I wonder are they given the presumption of innocence over there?
Of course. I get your point, but making arrests is still a good sign. They sound like they've worked long and hard on a lot of intelligence to make those arrests, which I think is the right thing to be doing.

Much better than shooting random Brazilians in the street, certainly.
In all honesty it was a serious question. I wonder how different the policies are. (As far as interrogation/trials)

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-23 14:19:55)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7008|SE London

Kmarion wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

I wonder are they given the presumption of innocence over there?
Of course. I get your point, but making arrests is still a good sign. They sound like they've worked long and hard on a lot of intelligence to make those arrests, which I think is the right thing to be doing.

Much better than shooting random Brazilians in the street, certainly.
In all honesty it was a serious question. I wonder how different the policies are. (As far as interrogation/trials)
Our trials are more open. I don't know about interrogation and how long people can be held, it keeps getting changed with new anti-terror legislation.

The openness with terrorist trials is probably down to the fact we've dealt with a lot of terrorist trials over here, rather than following the US approach of allowing military tribunals for terrorists rather than a proper trial by jury. Diplock courts (which were used often in terrorism trials (only one non-Irish related)) are now being abolished in favour of trial by jury and all the major terrorism trials lately have had a high level of openness (including the attempted suicide bombers of 21/7/05 amongst others). Something I am all for.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-01-23 14:30:28)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard