BF2S Forums why is there no sf servers?

There are, but BF2 is the core game, the add ons are just add ons. I hear ya man, I love SF, and the boosters for that matter,  but when you can play the origonal game, few people see interest in spending more for a new variation for the same game. It's like playing checkers with red and black pieces, or green and yellow pieces. You get some new shit, but its the same game.  I love the new colors, but its not enough to garnish a shit load of support.

Last edited by RoosterCantrell (2007-01-13 02:04:54)

henno13 wrote:

i got sf a few weeks ago and i noticed there are only 60-70 servers on sf maps

why cant ea take sf serourisly and put more maps on
(in my opinion sf is more fun than bf2)

why cant there be some 24/7 mass destruction,surge, night fight,lethavian etc
the only 24/7 servers ive seen r only on warlord, iron gator and ghost town!

Agreed *picks up strike stick* WE WANT MORE SF MAPS, WE WANT MORE SF MAPS *sets dwon stick, a few moments later.. EA comes out with another patch with fewer SF maps* O NOES! lol

I love SF haven´t touched vanilla in months. I also like SF IO only, seems to me more real. And yeah I want to play more Surge and Mass Destruction.

I think SF IO maps, but only with Quadbikes.

Emil_the_Slayer wrote:

Snake wrote:

Errr, I can find about 250 on SF.

Me to.... but how many of them that is populated.................. yeah, I agree, I want a 24/7 MASS DESTRUCTION/SURGE

Ah, nobody made any stated difference between populated or not

SF maps on IO pretty much suck. They are not designed for it. The only one that can be good for it, is Night Flight. But its a LOT better with vehicles.

henno13 wrote:

i got sf a few weeks ago and i noticed there are only 60-70 servers on sf maps

I was actually going to post that there seem to be more people playing SF lately, the last couple of weeks it seems there are more pupulated servers than there were toward the end of last year.

Snake wrote:

SF maps on IO pretty much suck. They are not designed for it.

LOL Neither are the vanilla maps; Wake, which seems like it would be THE worst map for this actually gets a whole new lease on life, giving the USMC more than a fair chance of winning.

Warlord and Ghost Town rock as IO, so does the small version of Iron Gator; Mass Destruction isn't too bad either. But of course you have to like no-vehicle mode... if ya don't then of course they'll suck IYO.

Snake wrote:

SF maps on IO pretty much suck.

yesterday i was playing on an IO server and was having so much fun i didn't realize it was IO until about the 3rd or 4th round

New 234/7 iron gator 64 player, always full good server

Yeah, it sucks trying to find decent SF servers. And I agree with everybody who says SF maps with IO is terrible. Yes, even Warlord and Ghost Town. The maps are sooo much better with vehicles. Also with the new gadgets you get in this game, you should want to play with vehicles since it becomes more exciting! There's only about 30-40 that are ever populated, and about 20 of them are IO Warlord, which sucks. I don't get it, I really don't see why so many people enjoy IO. Maybe they shouldn't suck so much and learn how to avoid/destroy vehicles. Seriously, the only reason they made IO was because people complain about tanks and jets and shit. Maybe you should just go anti-tank and learn how to kill them. It's not that hard, just takes a few days of practice. Hell, I love Anti-Tank, it's my favorite kit, only kit I have expert with so far. I personally do not think it takes that long to adjust to learn the kit. People are just too impatient with it and waste their rockets on infantry.