| George W. Bush | 36% | 36% - 57 | ||||
| The Republican Party | 18% | 18% - 28 | ||||
| The Democrat Party | 18% | 18% - 28 | ||||
| Other | 27% | 27% - 42 | ||||
| Total: 155 | ||||||
Because they hate the infedels who don't follow the words of Allah and Mohammed.Pierre wrote:
Why did they go Jihad on you?Capt_Flapjack wrote:
I say its the goddamn terrorists. If they hadn't gone Jihad on us, we wouldnt be forced to kick their ass.
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.lowing wrote:
stat tuned, and bubbalo and OUN will explain why a soldier killing an enemy during wartime is "technically" murder and thus should be charged with it, then sent to prison for life, ( because they don't believe in the death penalty I am sure)
huh? jibba jabba?falafel wrote:
the reps. cous bush is just a marionette
Since when are American soldiers doing that?UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.lowing wrote:
stat tuned, and bubbalo and OUN will explain why a soldier killing an enemy during wartime is "technically" murder and thus should be charged with it, then sent to prison for life, ( because they don't believe in the death penalty I am sure)
lowing didn't specify any exclusions to the statement that a soldier killing an enemy during wartime isn't murder. So I mentioned one instance where it would be considered murder.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Since when are American soldiers doing that?UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.lowing wrote:
stat tuned, and bubbalo and OUN will explain why a soldier killing an enemy during wartime is "technically" murder and thus should be charged with it, then sent to prison for life, ( because they don't believe in the death penalty I am sure)
Soldiers killing enemy combatants in combat is not murder, but lining up POW's and Executing them is against the rules of war.UON wrote:
lowing didn't specify any exclusions to the statement that a soldier killing an enemy during wartime isn't murder. So I mentioned one instance where it would be considered murder.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Since when are American soldiers doing that?UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.
It happens.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Since when are American soldiers doing that?UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.lowing wrote:
stat tuned, and bubbalo and OUN will explain why a soldier killing an enemy during wartime is "technically" murder and thus should be charged with it, then sent to prison for life, ( because they don't believe in the death penalty I am sure)
Things like that. I'm glad to say that they are being held accountable for their actions though.BBC wrote:
Four US soldiers are to face court martial over the alleged rape of an Iraqi girl and murder of her and her family, the US military has said.
Right.....who ever said that was legal in the first place?Bertster7 wrote:
Things like that. I'm glad to say that they are being held accountable for their actions though.BBC wrote:
Four US soldiers are to face court martial over the alleged rape of an Iraqi girl and murder of her and her family, the US military has said.
No one. But someone did ask "Since when are American soldiers doing that [murdering people]?".usmarine2007 wrote:
Right.....who ever said that was legal in the first place?Bertster7 wrote:
Things like that. I'm glad to say that they are being held accountable for their actions though.BBC wrote:
Four US soldiers are to face court martial over the alleged rape of an Iraqi girl and murder of her and her family, the US military has said.
If you don't think terrorsim is a problem for the world, then YOU and people like you, are part of the same problemPierre wrote:
What problem(s) do you refer to?lowing wrote:
Well bubbalo, I kinda looked at like we were in combat against repeated Bali bombings, repeated London bombings, repeated Spain bombings ( although appeasement and cowering seems to work best for them), against attacks in the Phillipines as well as repeated 911 attacks. The mistakes that were made were by the world burying its head in the sand for too long hoping this problem would go away.Bubbalo wrote:
So, basically, you feel it is the world's responsibility to fix the mistakes of a few nations?
Last edited by lowing (2007-01-15 15:28:53)
Do you have a reference or an accusation to make against the US? Or are is this comment really supposed to be outta left field??UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.lowing wrote:
stat tuned, and bubbalo and OUN will explain why a soldier killing an enemy during wartime is "technically" murder and thus should be charged with it, then sent to prison for life, ( because they don't believe in the death penalty I am sure)
You (we) can't win. It's impossible.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
The war on terror in Iraq and the rest of the world isnt over yet... it will take a long time but we will win... and we will protect even the morons who dont think there are any terror issues in the world...
Just explaining how a soldier killing an enemy during wartime can be "technically" murder. You did ask, didn't you?lowing wrote:
Do you have a reference or an accusation to make against the US? Or are is this comment really supposed to be outta left field??UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.lowing wrote:
stat tuned, and bubbalo and OUN will explain why a soldier killing an enemy during wartime is "technically" murder and thus should be charged with it, then sent to prison for life, ( because they don't believe in the death penalty I am sure)
Which will probably just force a shift towards homemade explosives and soft targets, since direct confrontation with armed forces will result in certain death anyway if you don't even have a gun.Bertster7 wrote:
A war on terrorism will, by its very nature, create more terrorists. The best you can hope for is to reduce the number of terrorists and to limit the arms they can get their hands on.
I hope you are not trying to use the picture of an innocent soldier as your example to prove your point. He was justified and no charges were brought on him. Better go dig through YOU TUBE and try again. Cuz pretty much, you didn't prove shit with that picture. Uh, "technically" speaking.UON wrote:
Just explaining how a soldier killing an enemy during wartime can be "technically" murder. You did ask, didn't you?lowing wrote:
Do you have a reference or an accusation to make against the US? Or are is this comment really supposed to be outta left field??UON wrote:
Techically it's legal under international law, unless they have surrendered. Stay tuned, and lowing will explain how lining up surrendered enemies and shooting them in the back of the head is self-defence.
http://media.npr.org/programs/day/featu … urb200.jpg
I thought I already had that one covered with the US soldiers who raped an Iraqi girl and murdered her family.lowing wrote:
I hope you are not trying to use the picture of an innocent soldier as your example to prove your point. He was justified and no charges were brought on him. Better go dig through YOU TUBE and try again. Cuz pretty much, you didn't prove shit with that picture. Uh, "technically" speaking.UON wrote:
Just explaining how a soldier killing an enemy during wartime can be "technically" murder. You did ask, didn't you?lowing wrote:
Do you have a reference or an accusation to make against the US? Or are is this comment really supposed to be outta left field??
http://media.npr.org/programs/day/featu … urb200.jpg
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/marine.asp
Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-01-15 16:08:10)
Well then since when is an Iraqi girl or her family an enemy soldier on the battlefield? SO pretty much outside the realms of the post ain't it?Bertster7 wrote:
I thought I already had that one covered with the US soldiers who raped an Iraqi girl and murdered her family.lowing wrote:
I hope you are not trying to use the picture of an innocent soldier as your example to prove your point. He was justified and no charges were brought on him. Better go dig through YOU TUBE and try again. Cuz pretty much, you didn't prove shit with that picture. Uh, "technically" speaking.UON wrote:
Just explaining how a soldier killing an enemy during wartime can be "technically" murder. You did ask, didn't you?
http://media.npr.org/programs/day/featu … urb200.jpg
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/marine.asp
Technically speaking of course.
True, it's still US soldiers murdering Iraqis.lowing wrote:
Well then since when is an Iraqi girl or her family an enemy soldier on the battlefield? SO pretty much outside the realms of the post ain't it?Bertster7 wrote:
I thought I already had that one covered with the US soldiers who raped an Iraqi girl and murdered her family.lowing wrote:
I hope you are not trying to use the picture of an innocent soldier as your example to prove your point. He was justified and no charges were brought on him. Better go dig through YOU TUBE and try again. Cuz pretty much, you didn't prove shit with that picture. Uh, "technically" speaking.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/marine.asp
Technically speaking of course.
Last edited by UON (2007-01-15 16:21:40)
