BF2S Forums Hmm whats this? Church's trying to cover up anchient human bones?

So what your trying to say is............ I was a monkey? I are don't believe you.

Last edited by acidkiller187 (2007-01-03 11:08:29)

Oh yeah, that excerpt really shows the fear of the christian world and their attempt to supress the finding of old bones!  Damn!  you GOT US!!

acidkiller187 wrote:

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

acidkiller187 wrote:

So what your trying to say is............ I was a monkey? I are don't believe you.

So what your trying to say is you where magicaly made by the power of a being whom no human alive now has seen and who is only talked about in a  book thousands of years old and whom has no possible explaination for his own existence? Both stories can be stretched

So as the saying goes "History repeats itself" does that mean were gonna go from human to ape?

And you just answered yourself (THERE IS NO REAL EXPLANATION)...

If history were to repeat itself then that would mean apes would turn into humans again... not the other way around...

Obviously the powerful churches care a lot. I was just wondering what there so afraid of. lol

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

If history were to repeat itself then that would mean apes would turn into humans again... not the other way around...

True! But in order for that to happen humans must first turn into apes, then go back from apes to humans and so on and so on and so on.....

lol I just have to say, all the people that believe in orgainised faith are retards and sheep.

Psycho wrote:

acidkiller187 wrote:

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

If history were to repeat itself then that would mean apes would turn into humans again... not the other way around...

True! But in order for that to happen humans must first turn into apes, then go back from apes to humans and so on and so on and so on.....

Um, how is humans turning into apes history repeating itself? That would be history doing the reverse of what it did before. Not only that, but the phrase "history repeats itself" is not a scientific standard. So, it has no relevance here.

Unless you are talking about the fact that for something to be proven scientifically it must be reproducable. Which is a far higher standard of "proof" than any religion requires.

I never was a monkey in the first place......... Don't believe in BS like that "PERIOD" But youre way of thinking is correct though +1 for helping me see the light.

Psycho wrote:

Yeah, and we know "religion" has done a great job of making scientific conclusions up to this point. Just ask Rene De Carte. It only took 300 years for the church to reverse his excommunication for stating the sun was at the center of the universe and not the earth. And that was about 10 years ago.

According to the bible the earth is only about 6,000 years old. There's too much scientific evidence for that to even be a possibility. Some still hold that belief while others "reinterpret" the bible to fit what is now known.

Technically, that's still incorrect.  The sun is not the center of the UNIVERSE (just our solar system), but close enough.

But this is exactly what I DON'T want my religion (or any other, since I'm not part of this EXACT one...) to do.  Repressing other religions (atheism is one) by demanding any evidence for OTHER religions be replaced.  I say, you're free to believe what you want. 

See, I can explain away these old bones and age of rocks (grand canyon question from earlier), by stating that God did it.  We're all being tested, and what better way than with misleading evidence?

Sounds weak, I know, it is.

Fen321 wrote:

You guys do realize we are all apes?

It's more correct to say that we're all primates.

acidkiller187 wrote:

So what your trying to say is............ I was a monkey? I are don't believe you.

No, you still are a monkey.

I don't understand why the church continually tries to sideline things that they don't like. Every time they try, all it does is draw attention to whatever it is they're trying to cover up.

acidkiller187 wrote:

Psycho wrote:

acidkiller187 wrote:

True! But in order for that to happen humans must first turn into apes, then go back from apes to humans and so on and so on and so on.....

Um, how is humans turning into apes history repeating itself? That would be history doing the reverse of what it did before. Not only that, but the phrase "history repeats itself" is not a scientific standard. So, it has no relevance here.

Unless you are talking about the fact that for something to be proven scientifically it must be reproducable. Which is a far higher standard of "proof" than any religion requires.

I never was a monkey in the first place......... Don't believe in BS like that "PERIOD" But youre way of thinking is correct though +1 for helping me see the light.

Well, even if you don't agree with someone, you seem to at least consider their arguments - more than what many "religions" people who blindly follow what they are told. I believe people are afraid to question anything about thier religion for fear they will be looked down upon. Plus, most religions are based upon the fact that they are the one true "truth" and are infallible. That is the problem with religions, IMHO.

You have to continually question that which is purported to be true unti it is proven to be true. The early philosophers were always in search for the truth, but they were also devoutly religious people. Even DeCarte was devoutly religios and struggled on how to handle the new proven truth he had found because it ran contrary to what the church purported to be true.

By the way, evolution does not purport that man evolved from monkeys. So, if you don't believe in evolution, do you believe that God instantaneously created Man and Woman? If so, how do you balance that with the fact that there are humanoid remains that have been recovered that are much, much older than the bible purports? Where do you believe that cromagnon and neanderthals fall into this?

Evolution is a fact, not a theory. There is direct evidence that evolution has occured. however, I do believe that if there is a God, he could have created humans at an advanced state and we have evolved from there or that God used evolution to create humans from more primitive animals.

[RDH]Warlord wrote:

Technically, that's still incorrect.  The sun is not the center of the UNIVERSE (just our solar system), but close enough.

Yes, I actually meant to include "universe" in quotes. Because at that time, I believe, they didn't realize there were different galaxies.

I beleive in evolution, not Adam and Eve. One quick thing though, the person who wrote the article is an idiot. Anthropology 101 : you cannot have evolved from something that still exists!!!! It says in the first paragraph how humans evolved from apes.Impossible, how are there still apes then? I understand the point they are trying to make, that way, way back our DNA was once one, and then they split which is why they are so similar. But dont accuse an organazation of covering up something that is genetically impossible to begin with.