BF2S Forums Why even high-end gaming mice don't come in Wireless versions

A corded mouse for the same prize as a wireless one will own the wireless mouse.
Yes, they may come to the same level, but after all, the receiver is also connected with a cable, and that interface will - maybe not noticeable, but still - make a difference.
Also, flexibility isn't necessarily higher with a wireless mouse, since obstacles would well affect your signal in a way - again, this mustn't be noticeable, but the longer that way the signal has to travel becomes, the longer will the response time be, aye?
And last but not least - battery life. That'd be so incomfortable to me, oh, checking it all the time... would suck.

Oh! By the way - 2,4 GHz transmission is not good for your cell structure - almost forgot that

I've never used anything but a wireless, but you've piqued my curiosity.  Maybe I'll try a wired mouse for a while and see how that works.

i had the mx 900. it sucked bad and it was heavier than my cat

[Hive]-Twist wrote:

Razer copperhead = win

I've had my MX1000 for ages, never had any problems with it. Only thing that bothers me about it, is if you don't move it for like 5 minutes, it switches itself off, and theres about a 1-2 second delay when you move it again before it switches back on. But in a game of BF2, you obviously won't leave your mouse alone for 5 minutes.
Battery also lasts for a good 30-40 hours before it completely dies on me, solid mouse all round.

My wireless mouse/keyboard set I got for 20 bucks has worn fine... I don't usually do that bad with it. Only problem I have is running the mouse off the pad because it has no cord.