GATOR591957
Member
+84|6937

CameronPoe wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

I would argue otherwise. Pointless stalemate leading ultimately to an infinity of circular arguments. There is not one good reason to suggest why some higher being has a hand in anything, in my mind.

If, in any of our lives, we wandered through life without having been exposed to the concept of 'god' (especially during our formative years) there is a distinct possibility thoughts of one would never cross our minds.
I will agree to your point of endless debate.  I will never change your mind because you have already made your decision on where you stand.  I would like to point out the mathematical side to this.  Programmers need a code to program, correct.  All life has DNA, correct?  All DNA has a code, correct?  Who designed the code?  If someone designed the code,  wouldn't that make them the "creator?"

I would ask you to read "The signature of God."  It has some compelling facts.  I did not make my decision strictly on this book.  Over my lifetime I've been pondering this very question.  Through deduction and observation I have made my stance, as you will over your lifetime.
Why does there have to be a creator of DNA? Why must a creator take credit for what could very well just be the product of chemical reactions in primordial times under the conditions that existed on earth at that time? Is not our lack of understanding about where DNA originated simply another barrier we have to overcome: like believing the earth was flat? God just seems to me to be a term that gets applied to anything as yet unexplained or to get over man's difficulty in comprehending the infinite/perpetual.

Again - stalemate.
My answer would be, what in this world has been made without a creator?  Toasters, washing machines, automobiles, someone invented or discovered everything.  Nothing just happened out of the blue.

I would agree to your assessment of the overuse of "God."

Last edited by GATOR591957 (2007-01-05 13:41:19)

Ratzinger
Member
+43|6702|Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Gee, I feel truly comforted to know that the supreme being (Oh sorry Supreme Being ffs) looks just like me.
Imagine if he looked like Alf, or Big Bird. It'd be sort of hard to take seriously, wouldn't it?

Of course, if he made Oprah in his (oh ffs His) image, it would mean respect.....

And Britney, and Anna-Nicole, and Pammy, Lindsay Lohan, Paris, Pete Docherty....

Now you have to take it seriously!
Daysniper
Member
+42|6945

Fen321 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Fen321 wrote:


You create all of it!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quantum physics says so
What part of Quantum physics says so?
The part where electrons/Nucleus the whole 9 yards acts like a wave of probability existing in MULTIPLE positions simultaneously, but when you choose to take a look at it BAM it becomes a particle in a fixed position of your liking. For the most part though I don't understand why people are still left thinking in the world of static "matter" since well there is no such thing. Not only that but these subatomic particles disappear at of existence then reappear...spooky ain't it.

Take a gander at the structure of atoms and its sub-atomic particles it is MOSTLY empty space
Actually, its only th electrons do that. And they are never where you predict they will be, but if you randomly look, they are there. weird.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

GATOR591957 wrote:

what in this world has been made without a creator?
The world itself (is just one example).

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-01-05 13:43:38)

GATOR591957
Member
+84|6937

Drakef wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

instakill wrote:

Wow I did not realise that religious people are so ignorant, Not one of you godly people have said anything that is worth reading.... Everyone has the answer either "I believe cause the bible says so" "I believe because mummy and daddy said i had too" "I believe because I dont want to go to hell" or the funniest "someone i know was dying and now they are not, god must be real" (hmm maybe the doctors got it wrong?) I just find it funny, Religion is faith, and is needed by weak people who cant live through life without thinking someone is helping them through, Sure you all say it would not have happened if i did not pray, That is more ignorant than saying God does not exist. I dont have the answer I dont know, but i think their is no way "some dude" created everything here on earth. My question is What will all of you believers say if/when we find life on another planet? due to the fact the planet will not be exactly like earth, you could assume the creatures/life living there will not be like what we are. You all say it is too set up to be self made, but you can find a link to anything if you try hard enough. One more thing, you all keep stating no scientist has seen a creature change from one species to another, Funny that considering evolution takes many, many, many generations to show a huge change.... everything changes slowly, So slow that no one will ever live long wnough to see evolution in all its glory. But in saying that all the religo's will come back with some crappy comment about feeling god in their lives (im sure it was just the flu), and all the non believers will debate back about the bible being fake.... IMO religion=gullability+weakness
Tell you what, since you're so smart, why don't you tell us the origin of life?

Tell us your reasons why the Bible is fake.  I think you just haven't taken the time or energy to thoroughly look at the question and analyze the facts.  Come back when you have something constructive to say.  Anyone can flame.
Simply because we truly don't understand the universe is not proof of the Bible being true. What we cannot explain does not automatically become a supernatural explaination. We will understand it one day. But for now, it becomes an unknown.
The same can be said for your argument as well.

Still looking for your reasons.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

Daysniper wrote:

Fen321 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


What part of Quantum physics says so?
The part where electrons/Nucleus the whole 9 yards acts like a wave of probability existing in MULTIPLE positions simultaneously, but when you choose to take a look at it BAM it becomes a particle in a fixed position of your liking. For the most part though I don't understand why people are still left thinking in the world of static "matter" since well there is no such thing. Not only that but these subatomic particles disappear at of existence then reappear...spooky ain't it.

Take a gander at the structure of atoms and its sub-atomic particles it is MOSTLY empty space
Actually, its only th electrons do that. And they are never where you predict they will be, but if you randomly look, they are there. weird.
No. No. No. No. No.
BALTINS
ಠ_ಠ
+37|6797|Latvia

GATOR591957 wrote:

My answer would be, what in this world has been made without a creator?  Toasters, washing machines, automobiles, someone invented or discovered everything.  Nothing just happened out of the blue.

I would agree to your assessment of the overuse of "God."
Of course not, but define God.

I just can't believe that a anthropomorphic intelligent what-so-ever created man. If you say god is, for example, some sort of massive energy field that led to the big bang, okay, that would be fine with me.
GATOR591957
Member
+84|6937

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

what in this world has been made without a creator?
The world itself (is just one example).
Proof?
GATOR591957
Member
+84|6937

BALTINS wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

My answer would be, what in this world has been made without a creator?  Toasters, washing machines, automobiles, someone invented or discovered everything.  Nothing just happened out of the blue.

I would agree to your assessment of the overuse of "God."
Of course not, but define God.

I just can't believe that a anthropomorphic intelligent what-so-ever created man. If you say god is, for example, some sort of massive energy field that led to the big bang, okay, that would be fine with me.
Can't say that.  We were made in his image.  Whatever that was back then.
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7026
Why are the people that are anti god...higher power... always so angry and bitter?   Couldnt you just accept that some people find happiness and solace in their faith and beliefs...    Dont equate living your life incongruently and expecting happiness with the belief that there is no God...  peace to all...
Love is the answer
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

GATOR591957 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

what in this world has been made without a creator?
The world itself (is just one example).
Proof?
Prove that it wasn't?

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-01-05 14:03:49)

BALTINS
ಠ_ಠ
+37|6797|Latvia

GATOR591957 wrote:

BALTINS wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

My answer would be, what in this world has been made without a creator?  Toasters, washing machines, automobiles, someone invented or discovered everything.  Nothing just happened out of the blue.

I would agree to your assessment of the overuse of "God."
Of course not, but define God.

I just can't believe that a anthropomorphic intelligent what-so-ever created man. If you say god is, for example, some sort of massive energy field that led to the big bang, okay, that would be fine with me.
Can't say that.  We were made in his image.  Whatever that was back then.
If man was made after gods image, then considering racial differences of man, that creation process does include evolution. So god actually is either black, or he looks like a ape. Oo
Ratzinger
Member
+43|6702|Wollongong, NSW, Australia
God - "Well what did you think I was gonna look like?"

Mr Garrison - "Not like THAT!"
Drakef
Cheeseburger Logicist
+117|6672|Vancouver

GATOR591957 wrote:

Drakef wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:


Tell you what, since you're so smart, why don't you tell us the origin of life?

Tell us your reasons why the Bible is fake.  I think you just haven't taken the time or energy to thoroughly look at the question and analyze the facts.  Come back when you have something constructive to say.  Anyone can flame.
Simply because we truly don't understand the universe is not proof of the Bible being true. What we cannot explain does not automatically become a supernatural explaination. We will understand it one day. But for now, it becomes an unknown.
The same can be said for your argument as well.

Still looking for your reasons.
My argument is that it is an unknown. Therefore, no reason to worship a god because we do not know why life exists. You provide an explaination for life, without proof, and claim that when we cannot explain something, it must be because God created it. That is false.

Why do I think the Bible is fake? I believe that the Bible is a creation of man. If you encourage us to "analyze the facts", then I respond with that religion has no room for facts, but instead conjecture and claims without proof. It is a story that would be met with the same reaction as an insane man's cries, or a fairy tale, except that centuries of persecution and violence have cemented its reputation as something to take serious. It is because we are an ignorant race, that needs an explaination. We cannot accept an unknown, but instead must choose what we believe in is that unknown. But it does not help when the fear of Hell is place into the situation, that the beliefs of a religion must be followed or the wrath of a god may be placed upon you. I look at the philosophical implications of a deity, and I see no logic in why this deity insists upon the worship of his being, no logic in the idea of free will, and no logic in Heaven or Hell other than a brilliant idea to frighten the masses. Every scientific implication over the centuries has been downplayed and condemned by the churches because it created an atmosphere of knowledge that could escape the religion's grasp, and contradicted what the church had told us about the unknown. Yet, science eventually explained the unknown, and the church became less powerful when we became more intelligent. The printing press allowed this to occur, and so did the expanding of human rights. Slowly we have become less religious, more intelligent, and more objective to the horrible past of the church, and a certain book that claims to be holy, but is nothing more than an ancient book. It is a book that permitted such persecution. It is a book that has no proof whatsoever.

We cannot simply assume the unknown is the work of a god. That is terrible logic. It is not proof of God's work in any way. The onus is on the religious to prove the existance of the gods, not for us to prove the unknown, because the unknown is what there is. What the religious have is a theory of what the unknown is, and to assume that there is a creator by logic is false. You may believe by faith, but in no way does anything give logic to God. Simply because man has invented technology is no proof of God's existance as a creator. That is illogical. I have no problem with your faith in God, but to claim that logically a deity exists by such means is an argument of no logic.
Mogura
Member
+17|6673|EUROPE

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

Why are the people that are anti god...higher power... always so angry and bitter?   Couldnt you just accept that some people find happiness and solace in their faith and beliefs...    Dont equate living your life incongruently and expecting happiness with the belief that there is no God...  peace to all...
because you(religus people) are not just happy to do so, you seek all the time to convert others, so much religius prozelitism,... i can keep doing like that for a while, with forced conversions and other,.....

PS: some people found my anti religion sig offending and reported me to admin, so the admin suppresed my sig.

question : why religius people can show everywher they simbols ( crosses, stars, moon croiscent,... ) to show they vision of creation and that they are believers and ... thats ok ! and not only i have no right to be offended but i have no right to show anti religius simbols/whatever other to show my way of thinking!
if i just dare to say something against raligion / god, they are offended and request me to shut up / not showing it anymore ! its taboo to talk against them.

but they can freely spit on "infidels" , call us of all names  and impose theyr simbolisme / morals, call science devils work ....

no dont have right to be offended

i dont care about stupid sig, .... its an insignifiant but demonstrativ exemple of religius Fascism.

i still dont have right to be offended
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6995|United States of America

instakill wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:

I don't believe you can be taken seriously if in your first sentence you call the opinion that you yourself do not hold ignorant.
wow, now lets put together a sentence that is understandable
How is it not?

Last edited by DesertFox423 (2007-01-05 16:51:14)

Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

DesertFox423 wrote:

instakill wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:

I don't believe you can be taken seriously if in your first sentence you call the opinion that you yourself do not hold ignorant.
wow, now lets put together a sentence that is understandable
How is it not?
it could use a comma or two, but then I can tell only tell that 'cos I can understand what it says...
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6995|United States of America

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:

instakill wrote:

wow, now lets put together a sentence that is understandable
How is it not?
it could use a comma or two, but then I can tell only tell that 'cos I can understand what it says...
There's a non-introductory adverb clause that contains an essential adjective clause. I suppose I could put a comma around that four-word prepositionial phrase at the beginning of the clause though.

Last edited by DesertFox423 (2007-01-05 17:20:00)

Religion=WAR
Member
+3|6786|Peace-loving Canada
I believe God is in each and every one of us, and it is up to us to discover the potential, and unlock the abilities of a "God".  Let's say a man could live a 100% completely sin free life; and educated himself about everything on the planet.  If that man could do this, he would probably have developed his brain a lot more than anyone else on the planet.  The average human uses 11% to 18% of their brain.  This is not a lot but still amazingly enough, equal to an 11 million gigabyte computer.  We can't even speculate as to what a computer of this caliber could be capable of.
     There are people on the planet that have developed certain aspects of their brain to a point. ie: Shaolin monks, speed readers, surgeons, pro-athletes, etc., and have god-like abilities in their field, and more than likely, use a higher percentage of a certain part of their brain. If we could use 50 or 80% maybe we could walk on water, turn water to wine, levitate, read minds, etc, etc, etc.
     My point is, I believe in God, but not your typical God, but an internal one.  We can not base beliefs on theory, as it only results in argument.  No one knows the real truth, it is our history, and we can't go back in time.(yet!), so to base your life on circumstantial evidence and theology is the same as believing there is no God.
I also believe we have already been here and beyond, on a technological level anyway, and have made all the same mistakes we are making now. Curios? Prob not. Karma me if you agree pls. I NEED KARMA! Don't know why! And write about other topics if you care, or want to. Peace
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

DesertFox423 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:

How is it not?
it could use a comma or two, but then I can tell only tell that 'cos I can understand what it says...
There's a non-introductory adverb clause that contains an essential adjective clause. I suppose I could put a comma arount that four-word prepositionial phrase at the beginning of the clause though.
I think that's what I meant - if I understood that correctly...

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-01-05 17:19:16)

Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

Religion=WAR wrote:

I believe God is in each and every one of us, and it is up to us to discover the potential, and unlock the abilities of a "God".  Let's say a man could live a 100% completely sin free life; and educated himself about everything on the planet.  If that man could do this, he would probably have developed his brain a lot more than anyone else on the planet.  The average human uses 11% to 18% of their brain.  This is not a lot but still amazingly enough, equal to an 11 million gigabyte computer.  We can't even speculate as to what a computer of this caliber could be capable of.
     There are people on the planet that have developed certain aspects of their brain to a point. ie: Shaolin monks, speed readers, surgeons, pro-athletes, etc., and have god-like abilities in their field, and more than likely, use a higher percentage of a certain part of their brain. If we could use 50 or 80% maybe we could walk on water, turn water to wine, levitate, read minds, etc, etc, etc.
     My point is, I believe in God, but not your typical God, but an internal one.  We can not base beliefs on theory, as it only results in argument.  No one knows the real truth, it is our history, and we can't go back in time.(yet!), so to base your life on circumstantial evidence and theology is the same as believing there is no God.
I also believe we have already been here and beyond, on a technological level anyway, and have made all the same mistakes we are making now. Curios? Prob not. Karma me if you agree pls. I NEED KARMA! Don't know why! And write about other topics if you care, or want to. Peace
The idea that we only use 10-20% of our brain is, I'm sorry to say, just plain wrong. We use all of our brain, pretty much all of the time, except when sleeping.

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-01-05 17:22:39)

DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6995|United States of America

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

it could use a comma or two, but then I can tell only tell that 'cos I can understand what it says...
There's a non-introductory adverb clause that contains an essential adjective clause. I suppose I could put a comma arount that four-word prepositionial phrase at the beginning of the clause though.
I think that's what I meant - if I understood that correctly...
Well the primary dealie is that the comma does nothing to change the meaning of the sentence. It just shows you where to pause if you are speaking the line. Now let's see if I can steer this topic back on track after my intoxicated evil grammar monkey swerved us off.

"God" = "Dog" spelled backwards. Dog = man's best friend. Therefore, God = man's best friend.

Still, as it has the belief seniority, I believe the burden of proof is on the anti-gods since they say, "the religious have no room for facts and science."

Last edited by DesertFox423 (2007-01-05 17:26:41)

tricky69
Member
+1|6701|UK
i hear you drakef!!! never heard it put so well +1
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7076|Cambridge (UK)

DesertFox423 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:


There's a non-introductory adverb clause that contains an essential adjective clause. I suppose I could put a comma arount that four-word prepositionial phrase at the beginning of the clause though.
I think that's what I meant - if I understood that correctly...
Well the primary dealie is that the comma does nothing to change the meaning of the sentence. It just shows you where to pause if you are speaking the line.
No, it does not change the meaning, but it does make it more understandable - we derive the 'sense' of both spoken and written sentences from more than just 'meaning' - those pauses are very important.

(also, "dealie"? )

DesertFox423 wrote:

Now let's see if I can steer this topic back on track after my intoxicated evil grammar monkey swerved us off.
Not if I can help it...
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|6955

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Religion=WAR wrote:

I believe God is in each and every one of us, and it is up to us to discover the potential, and unlock the abilities of a "God".  Let's say a man could live a 100% completely sin free life; and educated himself about everything on the planet.  If that man could do this, he would probably have developed his brain a lot more than anyone else on the planet.  The average human uses 11% to 18% of their brain.  This is not a lot but still amazingly enough, equal to an 11 million gigabyte computer.  We can't even speculate as to what a computer of this caliber could be capable of.
     There are people on the planet that have developed certain aspects of their brain to a point. ie: Shaolin monks, speed readers, surgeons, pro-athletes, etc., and have god-like abilities in their field, and more than likely, use a higher percentage of a certain part of their brain. If we could use 50 or 80% maybe we could walk on water, turn water to wine, levitate, read minds, etc, etc, etc.
     My point is, I believe in God, but not your typical God, but an internal one.  We can not base beliefs on theory, as it only results in argument.  No one knows the real truth, it is our history, and we can't go back in time.(yet!), so to base your life on circumstantial evidence and theology is the same as believing there is no God.
I also believe we have already been here and beyond, on a technological level anyway, and have made all the same mistakes we are making now. Curios? Prob not. Karma me if you agree pls. I NEED KARMA! Don't know why! And write about other topics if you care, or want to. Peace
The idea that we only use 10-20% of our brain is, I'm sorry to say, just plain wrong. We use all of our brain, pretty much all of the time, except when sleeping.
yeha I suppose you are right, in some prospect though because by giving or dividing the human mind in numbers and decimals you are only assigning them hard drive values. For example we as humans can learn as much as we can and the brain will never tell us running low on memory or hard drive full.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard