I don't fly so it's all the same to me....
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Aircraft should land to re-arm/repair
Instead of forcing them to land to rearm.. I suggest this
A) increase the power of surface to air missiles ( so it doesn't require 3 or 4 to down a plane )
OR
B) put a limit on the fuel range which would require landing to refuel.
A) increase the power of surface to air missiles ( so it doesn't require 3 or 4 to down a plane )
OR
B) put a limit on the fuel range which would require landing to refuel.
one word "no"markzed wrote:
I reckon that it would be better if they had to land, press a button to perform a 180 degree direction switch then wait for as long as a typical repair before taking off.
This would;
a) Reduce the scoring blowouts by experienced jet whores. It would take them longer to get back into baseraping position. It would balance out the overall scoring.
b) Increases their vulnerability period (ie. stationary on the tarmac).
c) Increase the realism.
d) Improve relations amongst jet whores (whores get a better rotation because you're bound to get TK'd when you land for a re-arm = new pilot.
* Squad members could possibly defend the plane for points (similar to flag).
* You could even force an Engineer to repair, which means you need an Eng. in your squad.
What do you think?
I don't even fly and I think it is gay. Because they planes would be useless
Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Yes.
...
Fail.
No.
Fail.
No.
um.... landing is simple. People wouldn't even bitch about jets if they were easy to use. But since they take some talent, people want them removed from the game so they can stop getting owned by them.evilcartman99 wrote:
The only way that could be pulled off is if EA fixed the whole jet thing. Landing is near impossible on a runway as it is and speed control sucks. The plane itself would have to be more realistic.
I don't want them removed - they add a nice element of fear to the game - I just just want them to be fair.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
ummm... landing is simple. People wouldn't even bitch about jets if they were easy to use. But since they take some talent, people want them removed from the game so they can stop getting owned by them.
To me, fair means not being strafed and killed 15 seconds after being strafed and killed at my uncap.
Yaocelotl wrote:
no
I just want a reliable defense against them. Currently, there is none.
it's a good idea to cut down on jet whores ruining the game for newer (and experienced) players, but its a bad idea because it would deter less experienced pilots.
Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Yes.
My biggest gripe is how on Wake and others where there's a carrier, you can be manning the defense guns ,and the plane can come in and kill you with a strafe of BULLETS before he's even on your radar, so you can't defend yourself. That's complete bullshit, and then of course it takes 3 or 4 missiles to take down the plane. It's whack to say the least.
Fair point.servo wrote:
My biggest gripe is how on Wake and others where there's a carrier, you can be manning the defense guns ,and the plane can come in and kill you with a strafe of BULLETS before he's even on your radar, so you can't defend yourself. That's complete bullshit, and then of course it takes 3 or 4 missiles to take down the plane. It's whack to say the least.
It would be nice if the range of the carrier AA was longer by about 15%. Just to let you get one in before you die.
nes
yeah but its VERY hard to land a plane in bf2
TigerXtrm wrote:
Janysc wrote:
cohen1976 wrote:
Really ? Even I may do ; btw , never crashed a jet while landing . It's plain & simple .henno13 wrote:
yeah but its VERY hard to land a plane in bf2
In my opinion , the only thing that may deal with jets in BF2 is TGM AA missile , like SA-3 ( or whatever ) in DC . It would take skill , but it will also land this bitches very quickly, even if it would take 2 hits to kill jet
Last edited by Longbow (2007-01-07 01:40:11)
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Aircraft should land to re-arm/repair