DoctorFruitloop wrote:
Genuine question here. This is not me being an English arse, I'm just not particularly well informed on this and want someone to clue me in.
Suppose Scotland is granted it's longed for independence, does it comletely cease to be anything to do with the UK? Would all Scottish members of the armed forces be sacked? Would all military assets be removed from Scottish land?
Just curious.
Scotland and England agreed in 1707 to join their respective Parliaments.
We can therefore not be "granted" our "longed for independance",if the people of Scotland agreed by democratic means to create an autonomous state or I should say re-create an autonomous state,then the practicalities would flow from that decision.
At present the role of Westminster is restricted to matters such as Tax,and Defence,both of which would obviously be affected, everything else is already a "devolved matter".
Our country would have to undertake a renegotiation with Europe but recently this experience has been successfully undertaken by a number of small on occasion ex soviet republics.
I think it safe to assume a strong relationship would continue to exist between both ourselves and the other nations within the UK.This could also free England from the "perceived" need to lead the UK and I think might lead to a re evaluation of what it means to be "english" within a multi cultural society.
When I am asked about "Independence" and in particular when I am asked by friends in London I point out that they view France as a separate country,why?
They point to a different History,Currency,Language,Education System,Political System,Climate,Legal System,Religion,Culture.
I then point out that all of the above also applies to Scotland.
POINTS OF CONTENTION.
1.Oil Revenues.
2.Where would Trident (or its replacement) be based.
3.Nuclear Power Stations.
4.It is not in the interests of the current US administration.
As regards our armed forces we would retain them with a model similar to Finland /Sweden/ Denmark.