| Airbus | 37% | 37% - 89 | ||||
| Boeing | 62% | 62% - 146 | ||||
| Total: 235 | ||||||
Last edited by usmarine2007 (2006-12-06 07:17:42)
Yes actually. I work for a new start-up airline.aardfrith wrote:
Just wondering what's inspired the question. Are you planning on buying one in the near future?
Then I think your executives are going to want a better source of public opinion.usmarine2007 wrote:
Yes actually. I work for a new start-up airline.aardfrith wrote:
Just wondering what's inspired the question. Are you planning on buying one in the near future?
They made their mind up already, I am just curious what people think.Coolbeano wrote:
Then I think your executives are going to want a better source of public opinion.usmarine2007 wrote:
Yes actually. I work for a new start-up airline.aardfrith wrote:
Just wondering what's inspired the question. Are you planning on buying one in the near future?
Fair do's.usmarine2007 wrote:
Yes actually. I work for a new start-up airline.aardfrith wrote:
Just wondering what's inspired the question. Are you planning on buying one in the near future?
Last edited by Titch2349 (2006-12-06 08:40:27)
It's so that each individual part is made by specialists that have loads of experience with that particular area. It makes sense when you think about it!ghettoperson wrote:
Oh and they had the rather ridiculous idea of making the A380 all over Europe, to keep everyone happy. Rather stupid if you ask me, as it seems like just about the least efficient way possible to build an aircraft. Boeing have the right idea, build about 12 of the fuckers right next to each other in the same plant.
Seats are not made by Airbus. There are a lot of different seats airlines can choose from. It is the airlines fault for the bad seats.TuataraDude wrote:
Boeing, no contest.
The Airbus seats are the crappiest seats you could ask for. Uncomfortable after about 3 minutes. I hope the people that selected them in your company sat in the for long enough to discover that. After a 3.5 hour flight, I feel like shit if it's been on an Airbus.
Last edited by usmarine2007 (2006-12-06 08:57:39)
Agree. 757 is my favorite plane.Gawwad wrote:
Boeing as the 757 is the most beautiful plane on earth and it's also the plane my dad flies
You don't think the A380 will hurt them? But, I do agree. Many airlines are going with A319's and A320's because they get better financing.zimmer92 wrote:
No. Airbus, for the simple reason that in 10 years, they will be ruling the skies.
You see, you learn something every day, as long as you are open to the opportunity. I did not know that. Thx.usmarine2007 wrote:
Seats are not made by Airbus. There are a lot of different seats airlines can choose from. It is the airlines fault for the bad seats.TuataraDude wrote:
Boeing, no contest.
The Airbus seats are the crappiest seats you could ask for. Uncomfortable after about 3 minutes. I hope the people that selected them in your company sat in the for long enough to discover that. After a 3.5 hour flight, I feel like shit if it's been on an Airbus.
For example, RECARO makes airplane seats, they also make seats for high end cars also.
Airbus is actually English, parts manufactured in england/germany/italy/france but assembled in france.ghettoperson wrote:
Boeing. Airbus are French. 'Nuff said.