Typically when you have a fundamental change in the mission of a given IGO you would see the end of that organization:
Terminaiton of IGOs:
By operation of a rule of international law
i. Impossibility of performance (e.g., disappearance of some object central to its operation) – NATO should have died when Greece and Turkey fought, both were memberes
ii. Fundamental change of circumstances making objective of organization moot – NATO its purpose was to defend west from WARSAW pact, but now peace keeping force
iii. Emergence of new peremptory norm (nothing can violate jus cogens)
So i must ask why do we still have NATO? Well you be the judge...
Last edited by Fen321 (2006-11-30 07:49:39)