[UTQ]_Ausch88 wrote:
kr@cker wrote:
so, i guess you missed the part where when they tried to apprehend him without using their weapons, he tried to grab their guns, and i suppose you also missed them telling him to stop as he tried to leave the scene, as well as missing the part where they took a non-lethal shot to the leg instead of "in the back".
is your name short for Auschwitz?
try actually watching the links you post.
They shoot an unarmed civilian who is walking away.. and you think that they have every right to do this.
then i think that every palestinian have the right to defend themsleves against IDF soldiers AND civilians.
ISRAEL will be destroyed.. get ready to welcome all those brave ISRAELIS in your country.
they tried to stop him without using their guns, and he tried to grab the weapons, they are soldiers, not cops. when hand to hand fails they use weaponry (usually the opposite is true, this guy is lucky they are choosing to be "less than lethal", and they do it quite well, that guy should be thankful they didn't just fill him with lead.
"an unarmed civilian that was walking away" - wrong.
he was obviously being detained for something, why is unknown as it is conveniently edited out of the tape (and you call us brainwashed). the fact that he was leaving is the whole point, he was obviously being told not to leave, and to surrender, and he chose not to.
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-11-22 10:47:12)