Although that is an opinion (popularly supported) it does eliminate risk of getting a 8-9 months wait time between each time + having one more mouth to feed => More pleaseurableStingray24 wrote:
3. Sex using a condom is not more pleasurable. Duh.
Last edited by WilhelmSissener (2006-11-22 10:13:23)
1. O Rly? So the AIDS lobbyists have been lying to me?Stingray24 wrote:
1. All the world's problems will not be solved by latex. Condoms don't prevent AIDS transmission.
2. I have found nothing in the Bible that convinces me that birth control is immoral or that sex is not for pleasure. (read Song of Solomon in the Bible hellooooo he's enjoying his wife's breasts and legs etc etc) Priests who aren't supposed to be having sex tell their congregations sex is not for pleasure to make themselves feel better about not getting any. Our Creator would not have given us the ability to gain pleasure from sex, if was only for reproduction.
3. Sex using a condom is not more pleasurable. Duh.
Does pregnancy not bother you? AIDS is almost preferable...Erkut.hv wrote:
1. O Rly? So the AIDS lobbyists have been lying to me?Stingray24 wrote:
1. All the world's problems will not be solved by latex. Condoms don't prevent AIDS transmission.
2. I have found nothing in the Bible that convinces me that birth control is immoral or that sex is not for pleasure. (read Song of Solomon in the Bible hellooooo he's enjoying his wife's breasts and legs etc etc) Priests who aren't supposed to be having sex tell their congregations sex is not for pleasure to make themselves feel better about not getting any. Our Creator would not have given us the ability to gain pleasure from sex, if was only for reproduction.
3. Sex using a condom is not more pleasurable. Duh.
2. Emphasis on word wife. If you are married, and both are faithful = no fear of AIDS. No problem with enjoying your wife, you're supposed. How else would you deal with her running her mouth all day?
3. Condoms suck, but I use them with a new girl, for the first 6 months or so. I just try and yank that bad boy off and blast away when my boy decides he's ready to chuck.
1. Where were you during sex education class? Obviously it won't whipe AIDS from the face of the earth but it will at least encourage religious idiots to use protection, thus lowering the number of infections.Stingray24 wrote:
1. All the world's problems will not be solved by latex. Condoms don't prevent AIDS transmission.
3. Sex using a condom is not more pleasurable. Duh.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-22 12:54:12)
The greates problem with the africans is that the men don't want to use condoms, because they are sure, that if they do, people think they have AIDS.Reciprocity wrote:
Now, if we can just convince African men that raping a virgin won't magically cure/protect them from HIV well be one step closer to overpopulating the planet.
Last edited by Gawwad (2006-11-22 13:06:48)
Have condoms been illegal?! Due to religion or is there another reason?CameronPoe wrote:
I would find it galling that if while 'going over the bible', which they've been doing for hmmmm about 1600 years now, they suddenly realised that condoms were OK and that the deaths of millions upon millions of people could have been prevented. Religion has a lot to answer for - especially in modern Africa.
Condoms were only fully legalised in the Republic of Ireland in 1993. How's that for a papal state?
In those days the Catholic Church practically controlled Ireland.Gawwad wrote:
Have condoms been illegal?! Due to religion or is there another reason?CameronPoe wrote:
I would find it galling that if while 'going over the bible', which they've been doing for hmmmm about 1600 years now, they suddenly realised that condoms were OK and that the deaths of millions upon millions of people could have been prevented. Religion has a lot to answer for - especially in modern Africa.
Condoms were only fully legalised in the Republic of Ireland in 1993. How's that for a papal state?
Last edited by doctastrangelove1964 (2006-11-22 13:40:40)
Eh?CameronPoe wrote:
I would find it galling that if while 'going over the bible', which they've been doing for hmmmm about 1600 years now, they suddenly realised that condoms were OK and that the deaths of millions upon millions of people could have been prevented. Religion has a lot to answer for - especially in modern Africa.
Condoms were only fully legalised in the Republic of Ireland in 1993. How's that for a papal state?
i was waiting for someone to post thatPenetrator_01 wrote:
Don't be silly, wrap your willy!
Wearing condoms could have prevented/limited the spread of disease all throughout Africa, to the children of philandering/drug abusing African adults too. The church in Africa spreads ridiculous lies and propaganda about condoms for reasons I know not why... Now Africa is ravaged by an epidemic. GG Pope JP.DesertFox423 wrote:
Eh?CameronPoe wrote:
I would find it galling that if while 'going over the bible', which they've been doing for hmmmm about 1600 years now, they suddenly realised that condoms were OK and that the deaths of millions upon millions of people could have been prevented. Religion has a lot to answer for - especially in modern Africa.
Condoms were only fully legalised in the Republic of Ireland in 1993. How's that for a papal state?
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-22 16:10:16)
wowHurricane wrote:
I just murdered a few 400,000 "good souls". Thank you Elin Grindemyr.
