CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765
AKIVA ELDAR IN ISRAEL'S HA'ARETZ:

It is difficult to believe that Baker really expects that this couple [Prime Minister Olmert and Defence Minister Peretz], who are incapable of evacuating a single outpost, will convince the public to give up the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, to dismantle settlements and evacuate citizens from their homes.
weamo8
Member
+50|6653|USA
The greatest was when Israel gave up Gaza as a peace offering, and the Palestinians took it and started launching missiles into Israel from Gaza.  lol... how great was that.  Crazy Palestinians.

Yeah, if I were Israel, I would be more than happy to concede the West Bank, Golan Heights and East Jerusalem to the Palestinians.  Palestinians have always known just how to say thank you.

Plus, every mile closer to Tel Aviv those fun-loving Palestinians make it, the more interesting it will be for everyone.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

weamo8 wrote:

The greatest was when Israel gave up Gaza as a peace offering, and the Palestinians took it and started launching missiles into Israel from Gaza.  lol... how great was that.  Crazy Palestinians.

Yeah, if I were Israel, I would be more than happy to concede the West Bank, Golan Heights and East Jerusalem to the Palestinians.  Palestinians have always known just how to say thank you.

Plus, every mile closer to Tel Aviv those fun-loving Palestinians make it, the more interesting it will be for everyone.
It's like the US being invaded by China, oppressed and then being given back Montana. If I was Palestinian I wouldn't be rushing out to kiss the nearest Israeli.
weamo8
Member
+50|6653|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

weamo8 wrote:

The greatest was when Israel gave up Gaza as a peace offering, and the Palestinians took it and started launching missiles into Israel from Gaza.  lol... how great was that.  Crazy Palestinians.

Yeah, if I were Israel, I would be more than happy to concede the West Bank, Golan Heights and East Jerusalem to the Palestinians.  Palestinians have always known just how to say thank you.

Plus, every mile closer to Tel Aviv those fun-loving Palestinians make it, the more interesting it will be for everyone.
It's like the US being invaded by China, oppressed and then being given back Montana. If I was Palestinian I wouldn't be rushing out to kiss the nearest Israeli.
So what do you expect all of the Israelis to do?  Lay down and die?  Get up and leave the country where they were born because their parents immigrated there "illegally" (which is debatable).  Where do they all go?

The UN screwed the Palestinians in 1947, not the Israelis.

The Israelis have done what they had to for survival.  They have often over-reacted, and I would love to wring Yitzhak Shamir's scrawny neck for insulting Syria and ruining the Madrid peace talks in 1991.

But they have also often under-reacted.  After about 2 days of Saddam's SCUDs hitting Israel I would have been tempted to lay a nuke down in downtown Baghdad.  The Arafat led Fatah guerrilla attacks on the West Bank after the 6 day war, with virtually no response, etc.

Every time Israel has made any kind of a concession the Palestinians have paid them back with violence.

Sinai, the Oslo accords, talks at Camp David and the second Intifada, Gaza.

Israel has rarely instigated the violence in any of the major conflicts.

So my question for you CameronPoe is:  If you were the Prime Minister of Israel, what would you do?

What would happen if Israel stopped fighting? Genocide?

What would happen if Arabs stopped fighting? Peace?

I have no great love for Israel, but I have a hard time backing the Palestinians.  They should have taken what they were offered in 1947.

Last edited by weamo8 (2006-12-07 17:33:51)

Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6752|Texas - Bigger than France

CameronPoe wrote:

weamo8 wrote:

The greatest was when Israel gave up Gaza as a peace offering, and the Palestinians took it and started launching missiles into Israel from Gaza.  lol... how great was that.  Crazy Palestinians.

Yeah, if I were Israel, I would be more than happy to concede the West Bank, Golan Heights and East Jerusalem to the Palestinians.  Palestinians have always known just how to say thank you.

Plus, every mile closer to Tel Aviv those fun-loving Palestinians make it, the more interesting it will be for everyone.
It's like the US being invaded by China, oppressed and then being given back Montana. If I was Palestinian I wouldn't be rushing out to kiss the nearest Israeli.
Dunno, launch rockets at Israel I guess....oops I meant China.  Violence is great.  Lets all cheer death.  Gimmie a D.  Gimmie a E.  D-E-A-T-H DEATH DEATH DEATH.

So, if I take what you say seriously - if Israel makes ANY peace offering, Palestine is justified in attacking Israel.  Also, ANY peace offering is a bad idea, because it's never enough.  Violence is the answer.

D
E
A
T
H

DEATH DEATH DEATH

Lighten up, and hope for a compromise...because that's the only thing possible.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

weamo8 wrote:

So my question for you CameronPoe is:  If you were the Prime Minister of Israel, what would you do?
I'd lead by example and start respecting international law.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-08 02:14:41)

oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6729|Πάϊ

weamo8 wrote:

So what do you expect all of the Israelis to do?  Lay down and die?  Get up and leave the country where they were born because their parents immigrated there "illegally" (which is debatable).  Where do they all go?
It wasn't debatable on page 5 of this conversation...

weamo8 wrote:

The UN screwed the Palestinians in 1947, not the Israelis.
True.

weamo8 wrote:

The Israelis have done what they had to for survival.  They have often over-reacted, and I would love to wring Yitzhak Shamir's scrawny neck for insulting Syria and ruining the Madrid peace talks in 1991.

But they have also often under-reacted.  After about 2 days of Saddam's SCUDs hitting Israel I would have been tempted to lay a nuke down in downtown Baghdad.  The Arafat led Fatah guerrilla attacks on the West Bank after the 6 day war, with virtually no response, etc.

Every time Israel has made any kind of a concession the Palestinians have paid them back with violence.

Sinai, the Oslo accords, talks at Camp David and the second Intifada, Gaza.

Israel has rarely instigated the violence in any of the major conflicts.

So my question for you CameronPoe is:  If you were the Prime Minister of Israel, what would you do?

What would happen if Israel stopped fighting? Genocide?

What would happen if Arabs stopped fighting? Peace?

I have no great love for Israel, but I have a hard time backing the Palestinians.  They should have taken what they were offered in 1947.
The term "react" is misguiding to say the least. You and all those who speak of reaction seem to ignore the actions of the Israeli government against the Palestinians for some weird reason. The truth is the Israelis have been acting since day 1. By definition the only side that can be accused of "over-reacting" is the Palestinians. And indeed, their methods have quite often made it difficult for all of us who are not directly involved to support them.

Furthermore I would add that the Israelis' "survival" was never at question. Rather the other way around!!!

The reason why it would seem as though the Palestinians are not responding in kind to Israel's concessions is the fact that these so-called concessions are not really what they claim to be, if you take into consideration what is being demanded in return.

Finally, I would agree that given the situation today, the 1947 partition plan sounds good. But you must take into consideration the time the decision against it was made, and the possibilities that existed back then.
ƒ³
[UTQ]_Ausch88
Banned
+23|6705
people are waking up in ISRAEL..

an ISRAELI dissident wrote this:

Let’s be honest (for once): The problem in the Middle East is not the Palestinian people, not Hamas, not the Arabs, not Hezbollah or the Iranians or the entire Muslim world. It’s us, the Israelis. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the single greatest cause of instability, extremism and violence in our region, is perhaps the simplest conflict in the world to resolve. For almost 20 years, since the PLO’s recognition of Israel within the 1949 Armistice Lines (the “Green Line” separating Israel from the West Bank and Gaza), every Palestinian leader, backed by large majorities of the Palestinian population, has presented Israel with a most generous offer: A Jewish state on 78% of Israel/Palestine in return for a Palestinian state on just 22% – the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. In fact, this is a proposition supported by a large majority of both the Palestinian and Israeli peoples.

http://www.icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?m … rticle=306
[UTQ]_Ausch88
Banned
+23|6705
look at the map of ISRAEL.. and tell me that the PALESTINIANS have no right to be upset

https://www.icahd.org/eng/images/articles/the-matrix-of-control.gif
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6791|SE London

[UTQ]_Ausch88 wrote:

people are waking up in ISRAEL..

an ISRAELI dissident wrote this:

Let’s be honest (for once): The problem in the Middle East is not the Palestinian people, not Hamas, not the Arabs, not Hezbollah or the Iranians or the entire Muslim world. It’s us, the Israelis. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the single greatest cause of instability, extremism and violence in our region, is perhaps the simplest conflict in the world to resolve. For almost 20 years, since the PLO’s recognition of Israel within the 1949 Armistice Lines (the “Green Line” separating Israel from the West Bank and Gaza), every Palestinian leader, backed by large majorities of the Palestinian population, has presented Israel with a most generous offer: A Jewish state on 78% of Israel/Palestine in return for a Palestinian state on just 22% – the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. In fact, this is a proposition supported by a large majority of both the Palestinian and Israeli peoples.

http://www.icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?m … rticle=306
What an insightful statement. Just what the Baker report suggests and what the Palestinians have been asking for. The fact the Israeli administration won't agree to a 78-22% split suggests they are being just a touch unreasonable about the whole thing.
rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6770

Bertster7 wrote:

[UTQ]_Ausch88 wrote:

people are waking up in ISRAEL..

an ISRAELI dissident wrote this:

Let’s be honest (for once): The problem in the Middle East is not the Palestinian people, not Hamas, not the Arabs, not Hezbollah or the Iranians or the entire Muslim world. It’s us, the Israelis. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the single greatest cause of instability, extremism and violence in our region, is perhaps the simplest conflict in the world to resolve. For almost 20 years, since the PLO’s recognition of Israel within the 1949 Armistice Lines (the “Green Line” separating Israel from the West Bank and Gaza), every Palestinian leader, backed by large majorities of the Palestinian population, has presented Israel with a most generous offer: A Jewish state on 78% of Israel/Palestine in return for a Palestinian state on just 22% – the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. In fact, this is a proposition supported by a large majority of both the Palestinian and Israeli peoples.

http://www.icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?m … rticle=306
What an insightful statement. Just what the Baker report suggests and what the Palestinians have been asking for. The fact the Israeli administration won't agree to a 78-22% split suggests they are being just a touch unreasonable about the whole thing.
Yes, what a wondeful one-sided statement.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|6976|UK
People people..

The solution is simple. Nuke everywhere but England. Then we rule the world.

/jking

But seriously, this arguement will go on forever they won't ever agree to just be grumpy neighbours, they have to be violent neighbours.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6791|SE London

rawls2 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

[UTQ]_Ausch88 wrote:

people are waking up in ISRAEL..

an ISRAELI dissident wrote this:

Let’s be honest (for once): The problem in the Middle East is not the Palestinian people, not Hamas, not the Arabs, not Hezbollah or the Iranians or the entire Muslim world. It’s us, the Israelis. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the single greatest cause of instability, extremism and violence in our region, is perhaps the simplest conflict in the world to resolve. For almost 20 years, since the PLO’s recognition of Israel within the 1949 Armistice Lines (the “Green Line” separating Israel from the West Bank and Gaza), every Palestinian leader, backed by large majorities of the Palestinian population, has presented Israel with a most generous offer: A Jewish state on 78% of Israel/Palestine in return for a Palestinian state on just 22% – the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. In fact, this is a proposition supported by a large majority of both the Palestinian and Israeli peoples.

http://www.icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?m … rticle=306
What an insightful statement. Just what the Baker report suggests and what the Palestinians have been asking for. The fact the Israeli administration won't agree to a 78-22% split suggests they are being just a touch unreasonable about the whole thing.
Yes, what a wondeful one-sided statement.
A statement that has been come up with by virtually ever group that has studied the situation and presented any sort of solution.

One sided? How?

This is an opinion expressed by the UN, the US investigating commission, the British and now by some Israelis themselves. Although throughout history there have been Israelis who have spoken out against the Zionist movement.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2006-12-10 10:23:17)

rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6770
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16148856/
What a wonderful soceity.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

rawls2 wrote:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16148856/
What a wonderful soceity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5033648.stm
What a wonderful society.
rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6770

CameronPoe wrote:

rawls2 wrote:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16148856/
What a wonderful soceity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5033648.stm
What a wonderful society.
Why don't you comment on my article and then I'll comment on yours
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

rawls2 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

rawls2 wrote:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16148856/
What a wonderful soceity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5033648.stm
What a wonderful society.
Why don't you comment on my article and then I'll comment on yours
What the Hamas gunman did was a heinous horrible act of deplorable inhumanity. Now you go...

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-11 11:22:55)

rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6770
Poor Hadithans. If the Iraqi's would stop listening to cleric''s and went along with the reconstruction none of that would have happened. Too bad the majority of Iraqi's slain have come at the hands of other Iraqi's.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

rawls2 wrote:

Poor Hadithans. If the Iraqi's would stop listening to cleric''s and went along with the reconstruction none of that would have happened. Too bad the majority of Iraqi's slain have come at the hands of other Iraqi's.
Nice unreserved apology there for the debauched acts of inhumanity committed by your fellow countrymen. "Those darn children: they just won't go along with the darn reconstruction." Committed by a westerner: excusable. Committed by an arab: deplorable. The hypocrisy is so saddening it's hilarious. You should be ashamed. It was purportedly done in your name, so you 'can be free'. Sickening.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-11 11:36:16)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6169107.stm

Go Jimmy Carter! Speak that truth!
rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6770

CameronPoe wrote:

rawls2 wrote:

Poor Hadithans. If the Iraqi's would stop listening to cleric''s and went along with the reconstruction none of that would have happened. Too bad the majority of Iraqi's slain have come at the hands of other Iraqi's.
Nice unreserved apology there for the debauched acts of inhumanity committed by your fellow countrymen. "Those darn children: they just won't go along with the darn reconstruction." Committed by a westerner: excusable. Committed by an arab: deplorable. The hypocrisy is so saddening it's hilarious. You should be ashamed. It was purportedly done in your name, so you 'can be free'. Sickening.
Westerner ideollogy = kill terrorist so children can grow too be adults.
Iraqi  ideology = kill fellow Iraqi's until US gets the point and leaves.
Hmmmm,, which one sounds flawed?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

rawls2 wrote:

Westerner ideollogy = kill terrorist so children can grow too be adults.
Iraqi  ideology = kill fellow Iraqi's until US gets the point and leaves.
Hmmmm,, which one sounds flawed?
Are you completely unaware of what happened at Haditha or something? US soldiers KILLED children in an act of rage. Sheesh. Both sound flawed to me.

PS The Hamas incident happened in PALESTINE.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-11 12:00:43)

Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6752|Texas - Bigger than France
What's Iraq doing in this thread?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6765

Pug wrote:

What's Iraq doing in this thread?
I used it to compare against something rawls brought up to show how he pounces on anything arabs do and overlooks things Israelis and westerners do. Shouldn't have. I don't wanna have this thread derailed.
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6752|Texas - Bigger than France
Nah, it's okay.

You should be banned for showing nipple in your sig.  Ahh, that sexy beast.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard