well aint you a peice of shit.Yaocelotl wrote:
For this and many reasons I'm glad that JUBA exists.
juba never existed, just haji propaganda
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-12-08 21:46:31)
well aint you a peice of shit.Yaocelotl wrote:
For this and many reasons I'm glad that JUBA exists.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-12-08 21:46:31)
Is it necessary to post some videos of some good headshoots? (Excuse, but I love to snipe as well ). Or you are just in complete denial of what your are being spoonfed? I remembered that I can't because that got me last time temp bannedGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
well aint you a peice of shit.Yaocelotl wrote:
For this and many reasons I'm glad that JUBA exists.
juba never existed, just haji propaganda
JABU could be more than one person. These people have no morals so they would lie to act like someone like that exists.Yaocelotl wrote:
Is it necessary to post some videos of some good headshoots? (Excuse, but I love to snipe as well ). Or you are just in complete denial of what your are being spoonfed? I remembered that I can't because that got me last time temp bannedGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
well aint you a peice of shit.Yaocelotl wrote:
For this and many reasons I'm glad that JUBA exists.
juba never existed, just haji propaganda
You make complete sense. Some people tease kids over a bottle of water, so have a fake sniper shoot them in the head. No wonder you support the fake Jabu... Your a terrorist just like the rest of them...Yaocelotl wrote:
Is it necessary to post some videos of some good headshoots? (Excuse, but I love to snipe as well ). Or you are just in complete denial of what your are being spoonfed? I remembered that I can't because that got me last time temp bannedGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
well aint you a peice of shit.Yaocelotl wrote:
For this and many reasons I'm glad that JUBA exists.
juba never existed, just haji propaganda
The fact that they largely did away with it when they modernised is irrelevant. Further, that was largely because they viewed non-Japanese as inferior. Finally, it ought be noted that many commanders treated enemy soldiers with great respect: the only problem came with conflicting beliefs about the duty of a captured soldier.arson wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimesBubbalo wrote:
Japan has a warrior tradition in which enemies are treated with respect.
This can help you to get your facts straight.
is it necessary for me to point out that its propaganda...chumpYaocelotl wrote:
Is it necessary to post some videos of some good headshoots? (Excuse, but I love to snipe as well ). Or you are just in complete denial of what your are being spoonfed? I remembered that I can't because that got me last time temp bannedGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
well aint you a peice of shit.Yaocelotl wrote:
For this and many reasons I'm glad that JUBA exists.
juba never existed, just haji propaganda
Because when 1 out of thousands act like an asshole, a generalization will occur. It is not a double standard.Bubbalo wrote:
The question I have: every time there's something bad about US soldiers, people go on about how it's the few. Every time there's something good, it becomes generalised to be representative of the whole army. Why the double standard?
why is everyone talking about the jews?BeerzGod wrote:
What part about this "Gentleman's War" included the deaths of millions of Jewish peoples?
Last edited by Flonster (2006-12-08 22:52:48)
How so? You commonly generalise the good acts, yet complain about anyone who generalises the bad acts.usmarine2007 wrote:
Because when 1 out of thousands act like an asshole, a generalization will occur. It is not a double standard.Bubbalo wrote:
The question I have: every time there's something bad about US soldiers, people go on about how it's the few. Every time there's something good, it becomes generalised to be representative of the whole army. Why the double standard?
No, I do not complain about that. Generalize all you want, how can you meet everyone in this world? You have to generalize. I get mad when that is all someone talks about 99% of the time.Bubbalo wrote:
How so? You commonly generalise the good acts, yet complain about anyone who generalises the bad acts.usmarine2007 wrote:
Because when 1 out of thousands act like an asshole, a generalization will occur. It is not a double standard.Bubbalo wrote:
The question I have: every time there's something bad about US soldiers, people go on about how it's the few. Every time there's something good, it becomes generalised to be representative of the whole army. Why the double standard?
Then don't ask me questions or answer mine you tool.Bubbalo wrote:
You know, it's kind of hard to argue with you when your posts make no sense, as well as being blatantly false.
Actually it's quite revealing to show the common soldier wants to shoot at kids for throwing rocks at their military vehicles. If a military vehicle can't take the force of a rock thrown by a kid? Are you saying the kid should pay with his life? That guy was pissed he couldn't shoot at them, even before the rock hit the window, he was even taunting the kids. Those vehicles are made for abuse, if they are given inferior vehicles by their own army, why blame some kid on the side of a road who doesn't know any better.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Nope, there is nothing wrong with it. It's not like they are raping or murdering children in the video. You people are overreacting. There are much better examples on the internet where you could complain about US soldiers, but this is harmless. This thread is beyond the boundaries of stupidity.Dec45 wrote:
Am I the only person here who didn't find anything wrong with that?Flonster wrote:
i know the most of US Soldiers are good guys.. but please explain W H A T the hell are going on there!!
Ive been on duty 2 Years, and i never would do this to children. even if their dad kills my friend
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/116 … Iraqi_Kids
Last edited by JaggedPanther (2006-12-09 14:28:42)
Are you kidding? The Japanese murdered American POWs in cold blood before every meal in WWII...Bubbalo wrote:
Japan has a warrior tradition in which enemies are treated with respect.
Question Are you Combat Arms.Flonster wrote:
i know the most of US Soldiers are good guys.. but please explain W H A T the hell are going on there!!
Ive been on duty 2 Years, and i never would do this to children. even if their dad kills my friend
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/116 … Iraqi_Kids
Hey bubbalo guy, incase you didnt notice, not everyone is a liberal, Im joining the marines in a year to help keep America an Empire, and keep everyone in their place, not everyone cares about why we are going to war, empires need money, and money they shall get.Bubbalo wrote:
The fact that they largely did away with it when they modernised is irrelevant. Further, that was largely because they viewed non-Japanese as inferior. Finally, it ought be noted that many commanders treated enemy soldiers with great respect: the only problem came with conflicting beliefs about the duty of a captured soldier.arson wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimesBubbalo wrote:
Japan has a warrior tradition in which enemies are treated with respect.
This can help you to get your facts straight.
i could answer that for him, hell no!davespanzer777 wrote:
Question Are you Combat Arms.Flonster wrote:
i know the most of US Soldiers are good guys.. but please explain W H A T the hell are going on there!!
Ive been on duty 2 Years, and i never would do this to children. even if their dad kills my friend
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/116 … Iraqi_Kids
That's funny, since I think questions generally end in question marks, or at least are full thoughts, not "are you combat arms".davespanzer777 wrote:
Question Are you Combat Arms.Flonster wrote:
i know the most of US Soldiers are good guys.. but please explain W H A T the hell are going on there!!
Ive been on duty 2 Years, and i never would do this to children. even if their dad kills my friend
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/116 … Iraqi_Kids
god dam this guy must be fucking John kerry up the ass.Bubbalo wrote:
Yes, how disrespectful of me to criticise armies who fight not for what is right but for what their leaders deem to be in their nations interest.Clark W Griswald wrote:
How very disrepectful of you. You are a fucking cunt and should die in fire.
god damn you must be ignorant as hellLeprechaun56 wrote:
god dam this guy must be fucking John kerry up the ass.Bubbalo wrote:
Yes, how disrespectful of me to criticise armies who fight not for what is right but for what their leaders deem to be in their nations interest.Clark W Griswald wrote:
How very disrepectful of you. You are a fucking cunt and should die in fire.
What are you, a Fucking English Teacher.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>RedTwizzler wrote:
That's funny, since I think questions generally end in question marks, or at least are full thoughts, not "are you combat arms".davespanzer777 wrote:
Question Are you Combat Arms.Flonster wrote:
i know the most of US Soldiers are good guys.. but please explain W H A T the hell are going on there!!
Ive been on duty 2 Years, and i never would do this to children. even if their dad kills my friend
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/116 … Iraqi_Kids