| Yes | 54% | 54% - 107 | ||||
| No | 33% | 33% - 66 | ||||
| Stop the polls | 11% | 11% - 23 | ||||
| Total: 196 | ||||||
That's not true. There have been several terror attacks since 2000 involving planes or trains since the year 2000 not involving muslims.The Magic Mullet wrote:
Yes.
Every person who has commited a terrorist attack involving aeroplanes & trains aince the year 2000 has been a muslim male. Profiling makes sense.
Well, most Chechens are Muslim, to be fair...............Bertster7 wrote:
Chechen rebels?
Most, but they don't look like typical Muslims. They look like Eastern European/Russians. You don't declare your religion when boarding a plane.Bubbalo wrote:
Well, most Chechens are Muslim, to be fair...............Bertster7 wrote:
Chechen rebels?
Have any white people ever hijacked planes with intentions to commit mass mureder? That is the debate, airport security not parking garage security. Just wondering if anyone knows of any. *sigh*Des.Kmal wrote:
Remember Timothy McFay(that dude who bombed Ohio) he was white.
So, anyone can do it. Not just Terrorist, or the preset: Muslims.
Plenty of Muslims around the world who look plenty white...deeznutz1245 wrote:
Have any white people ever hijacked planes with intentions to commit mass mureder? That is the debate, airport security not parking garage security. Just wondering if anyone knows of any. *sigh*Des.Kmal wrote:
Remember Timothy McFay(that dude who bombed Ohio) he was white.
So, anyone can do it. Not just Terrorist, or the preset: Muslims.
By that logic security wasn't needed pre-9/11deeznutz1245 wrote:
Have any white people ever hijacked planes with intentions to commit mass mureder? That is the debate, airport security not parking garage security. Just wondering if anyone knows of any. *sigh*
I've heard that they pretty much check everything that goes to the planes and they definately have the tightest security of all the airlines.kr@cker wrote:
profiling is a legitimate tool, odd how no one complains when 99% of all serial killers are initially profiled as being 30-something white dudes. if a black person gets "lynched" no one complains when cops look for white people. if you're looking for a fanatic of a religion that teaches white people are the devil then you may want to start looking for non-white religious fanatics. isreal air uses profiling without a second thought and have never had a terrorist event, seems to me like they would be the biggest target on the hit list.
Last edited by Gawwad (2006-11-21 08:25:55)
right? and i said plane where? please tell me? please.Clark W Griswald wrote:
What? What in the world are you talking about? And he did not blow up a plane. What is wrong with you? I swear there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section.Des.Kmal wrote:
Remember Timothy McFay(that dude who bombed Ohio) he was white.
Last edited by التعريفات (2006-11-21 17:17:55)
I concur, this is post 9/11 though.Bubbalo wrote:
By that logic security wasn't needed pre-9/11deeznutz1245 wrote:
Have any white people ever hijacked planes with intentions to commit mass murder? That is the debate, airport security not parking garage security. Just wondering if anyone knows of any. *sigh*
Does the color of their skin make them less capable? Are you racist against whites, you don't think they're capable of blowing up planes?deeznutz1245 wrote:
I concur, this is post 9/11 though.Bubbalo wrote:
By that logic security wasn't needed pre-9/11deeznutz1245 wrote:
Have any white people ever hijacked planes with intentions to commit mass murder? That is the debate, airport security not parking garage security. Just wondering if anyone knows of any. *sigh*
WRONG. Im going to copy and paste the title for you seing how you are to busy taking that IQ test to scroll up and read it before you embarass yourself:Des.Kmal wrote:
right? and i said plane where? please tell me? please.Clark W Griswald wrote:
What? What in the world are you talking about? And he did not blow up a plane. What is wrong with you? I swear there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section.Des.Kmal wrote:
Remember Timothy McFay(that dude who bombed Ohio) he was white.
PLEASE.
ok. since u cant, there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section, please leave.
he bombed a building, with im not sure. but it was big.
i didnt say he bombed an airport. this thread was half about profiling and airport security, i choose teh racial profiling, and said timothy mcfay was white, so its not all about race or religion.
kthxbai nub
No, he had a valid point. Whites are capable of blowing things up, what makes planes different?deeznutz1245 wrote:
WRONG. Im going to copy and paste the title for you seing how you are to busy taking that IQ test to scroll up and read it before you embarass yourself:Des.Kmal wrote:
right? and i said plane where? please tell me? please.Clark W Griswald wrote:
What? What in the world are you talking about? And he did not blow up a plane. What is wrong with you? I swear there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section.
PLEASE.
ok. since u cant, there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section, please leave.
he bombed a building, with im not sure. but it was big.
i didnt say he bombed an airport. this thread was half about profiling and airport security, i choose teh racial profiling, and said timothy mcfay was white, so its not all about race or religion.
kthxbai nub
Post reply
Index » Debate and Serious Talk » Should airport security procedures include ethnic/religious profiling? (K:4)
Did you catch all of that? See the word "include"? That links "ethnic profiling" to "airport security procedures" That is the topic, just admit you didnt use your head.
You sir, are a twit.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I concur, this is post 9/11 though.Bubbalo wrote:
By that logic security wasn't needed pre-9/11deeznutz1245 wrote:
Have any white people ever hijacked planes with intentions to commit mass murder? That is the debate, airport security not parking garage security. Just wondering if anyone knows of any. *sigh*
u are too leet for I. i dont understand ur fucked up logic. but gg nub anyway.deeznutz1245 wrote:
WRONG. Im going to copy and paste the title for you seing how you are to busy taking that IQ test to scroll up and read it before you embarass yourself:Des.Kmal wrote:
right? and i said plane where? please tell me? please.Clark W Griswald wrote:
What? What in the world are you talking about? And he did not blow up a plane. What is wrong with you? I swear there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section.
PLEASE.
ok. since u cant, there should be a mandatory IQ test for this section, please leave.
he bombed a building, with im not sure. but it was big.
i didnt say he bombed an airport. this thread was half about profiling and airport security, i choose teh racial profiling, and said timothy mcfay was white, so its not all about race or religion.
kthxbai nub
Post reply
Index » Debate and Serious Talk » Should airport security procedures include ethnic/religious profiling? (K:4)
Did you catch all of that? See the word "include"? That links "ethnic profiling" to "airport security procedures" That is the topic, just admit you didnt use your head.
Last edited by Des.Kmal (2006-11-21 17:43:15)
Point of thread was airport security. We all know anyone can blow up anything, but that was not the point of the thread. And to say it happened in Ohio.......... come on.jonsimon wrote:
No, he had a valid point. Whites are capable of blowing things up, what makes planes different?
I think anyone can hijack a plane or any other terrorist crime for that matter. The truth is there is one particular ethnicity that is hijacking planes, and we have identified them. I dont think by any means we should profile people (of any race) in day to day situations, however, a facility that is responsible for people boarding machines that are thrusted through the air at 800 mph (airport) should take every security measure possible. If they feel their rights are infringed upon, oh well. Stop blowing shit up.jonsimon wrote:
Does the color of their skin make them less capable? Are you racist against whites, you don't think they're capable of blowing up planes?deeznutz1245 wrote:
I concur, this is post 9/11 though.Bubbalo wrote:
By that logic security wasn't needed pre-9/11
No twit, my logic is to check every bloody soul that boards. That would prevent ALL persons from smuggling any potential weapon being used for aid in hijacking. But since we are not, and Im not sure why, lets stick with checking the people who have repeatedly hijacked our planes.Bubbalo wrote:
You sir, are a twit.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I concur, this is post 9/11 though.Bubbalo wrote:
By that logic security wasn't needed pre-9/11
If we followed your logic for deciding what is and isn't appropriate, there would only be measures to protect against attacks that have happened, no that might or will happen.
Jarhead....youre back?usmarine2005 wrote:
Point of thread was airport security. We all know anyone can blow up anything, but that was not the point of the thread. And to say it happened in Ohio.......... come on.jonsimon wrote:
No, he had a valid point. Whites are capable of blowing things up, what makes planes different?
Not for too long.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Jarhead....youre back?usmarine2005 wrote:
Point of thread was airport security. We all know anyone can blow up anything, but that was not the point of the thread. And to say it happened in Ohio.......... come on.jonsimon wrote:
No, he had a valid point. Whites are capable of blowing things up, what makes planes different?
No, you're suggesting we check the people who share skin color with people have hijacked a plane once.deeznutz1245 wrote:
No twit, my logic is to check every bloody soul that boards. That would prevent ALL persons from smuggling any potential weapon being used for aid in hijacking. But since we are not, and Im not sure why, lets stick with checking the people who have repeatedly hijacked our planes.Bubbalo wrote:
You sir, are a twit.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I concur, this is post 9/11 though.
If we followed your logic for deciding what is and isn't appropriate, there would only be measures to protect against attacks that have happened, no that might or will happen.
But the thread was about racism in security, and he pointed out a case where the kind of discrimination you're advocating wasn't valid. So why should it be valid in an airport?usmarine2005 wrote:
Point of thread was airport security. We all know anyone can blow up anything, but that was not the point of the thread. And to say it happened in Ohio.......... come on.jonsimon wrote:
No, he had a valid point. Whites are capable of blowing things up, what makes planes different?