kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6822|Southeastern USA
lowing
Mckinney's taking heat for not casting a single vote since she lost the primary in september (i think it's sept at least), i say we quit paying her til she shows up for one. did you hear about her bodyguards roughing up press members and confiscating tapes during the campaign?

Last edited by kr@cker (2006-11-14 10:36:38)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

kr@cker wrote:

lowing
Mckinney's taking heat for not casting a single vote since she lost the primary in september (i think it's sept at least), i say we quit paying her til she shows up for one. did you hear about her bodyguards roughing up press members and confiscating tapes during the campaign?
lol yeah but that is different, remember liberals are not capable of violence.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA
notice how this thread kinda died down rapidly?? lol
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,054|7044|PNW

lowing wrote:

notice how this thread kinda died down rapidly?? lol
I guess Shipbuilder silently agrees that I wasn't 'covering my butt,' after all, or I'd have seen a snappy comeback by now. Of course, it would suit the quality of this forum just fine if the topic was closed for presumptuous presumption.

OH NOES! RIGHT-WING SENZERSH!p!!@~112

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-11-14 21:00:48)

Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6834

Commie Killer wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

He sent a nonhazardous substance with some death threats.  He was arrested, he has issues, who cares.  He is obviously not part of "honorable conservatives" and his actions are wrong whether conservative or lib, so no condemnation is needed.  If some liberal nut sent the same thing to conservative leaders I'd say the same thing.  I wouldn't demand an apology from you libs.  We know all Dems wouldn't want to kill conservatives, just as all Reps don't want to kill liberals.   This thread is lame.
But honestly, WHICH of the two parties are known for their violent protests/actions?  You'd be hard up to find a democrat (let alone hard-core liberal) who has done crazy chit like this.  Liberals simply use their heads more.
I think you are proof that you last sentence is bull shit.
This from a guy named Commie Killer, clearly the voice of calm and reason.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,054|7044|PNW

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

lowing wrote:

notice how this thread kinda died down rapidly?? lol
I guess Shipbuilder silently agrees that I wasn't 'covering my butt,' after all, or I'd have seen a snappy comeback by now. Of course, it would suit the quality of this forum just fine if the topic was closed for presumptuous presumption.

OH NOES! RIGHT-WING SENZERSH!p!!@~112
shipbuilder is practicing his new belief not to be a jerk to those that disagree with him, apparently he can only accomplish that by actually, NOT responding to those that disagree with him. Whatever works.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7030|Argentina

lowing wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

lowing wrote:

notice how this thread kinda died down rapidly?? lol
I guess Shipbuilder silently agrees that I wasn't 'covering my butt,' after all, or I'd have seen a snappy comeback by now. Of course, it would suit the quality of this forum just fine if the topic was closed for presumptuous presumption.

OH NOES! RIGHT-WING SENZERSH!p!!@~112
shipbuilder is practicing his new belief not to be a jerk to those that disagree with him, apparently he can only accomplish that by actually, NOT responding to those that disagree with him. Whatever works.
I find Shipbuilder one of the most intelligent persons in this forum.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I guess Shipbuilder silently agrees that I wasn't 'covering my butt,' after all, or I'd have seen a snappy comeback by now. Of course, it would suit the quality of this forum just fine if the topic was closed for presumptuous presumption.

OH NOES! RIGHT-WING SENZERSH!p!!@~112
shipbuilder is practicing his new belief not to be a jerk to those that disagree with him, apparently he can only accomplish that by actually, NOT responding to those that disagree with him. Whatever works.
I find Shipbuilder one of the most intelligent persons in this forum.
you would.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7030|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


shipbuilder is practicing his new belief not to be a jerk to those that disagree with him, apparently he can only accomplish that by actually, NOT responding to those that disagree with him. Whatever works.
I find Shipbuilder one of the most intelligent persons in this forum.
you would.
I'll take that as a compliment.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


I find Shipbuilder one of the most intelligent persons in this forum.
you would.
I'll take that as a compliment.
you go right ahead, serge, you go right ahead. lol
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7030|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


you would.
I'll take that as a compliment.
you go right ahead, serge, you go right ahead. lol
You don't find The_Shipbuilder intelligent?  I would like to know your opinion.  He clearly thinks different than you, but does that make him less intelligent?  I'm surprised the way you label a person who doesn't agree with you.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


I'll take that as a compliment.
you go right ahead, serge, you go right ahead. lol
You don't find The_Shipbuilder intelligent?  I would like to know your opinion.  He clearly thinks different than you, but does that make him less intelligent?  I'm surprised the way you label a person who doesn't agree with you.
Nope, he is a jerk and he pretty much admits a a much when he posted his thread on the topic. Pretty much admitting he is so much a jerk he can't even stand himself.

Nope I hold you, Cameronpoe, and a few others in high regard. I love debating with you guys, and you guys disagree with me about 100% of the time lol.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7030|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


you go right ahead, serge, you go right ahead. lol
You don't find The_Shipbuilder intelligent?  I would like to know your opinion.  He clearly thinks different than you, but does that make him less intelligent?  I'm surprised the way you label a person who doesn't agree with you.
Nope, he is a jerk and he pretty much admits a a much when he posted his thread on the topic. Pretty much admitting he is so much a jerk he can't even stand himself.

Nope I hold you, Cameronpoe, and a few others in high regard. I love debating with you guys, and you guys disagree with me about 100% of the time lol.
I disagree with you 110% of the time, but I don't think you are a jerk.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


You don't find The_Shipbuilder intelligent?  I would like to know your opinion.  He clearly thinks different than you, but does that make him less intelligent?  I'm surprised the way you label a person who doesn't agree with you.
Nope, he is a jerk and he pretty much admits a a much when he posted his thread on the topic. Pretty much admitting he is so much a jerk he can't even stand himself.

Nope I hold you, Cameronpoe, and a few others in high regard. I love debating with you guys, and you guys disagree with me about 100% of the time lol.
I disagree with you 110% of the time, but I don't think you are a jerk.
lol sorry, 110% then
Tetrino
International OMGWTFBBQ
+200|7003|Uhh... erm...
lowing is fun to argue with. His deployed logic and linguistic skills, not often seen in bf2s, provide very strong competition. We welcome you!
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6646|Kyiv, Ukraine
http://www.armchairsubversive.com/

I'll throw my hat in with the "libs" on this one...go to the website above.  Every one listed is a verifiable fact with a link to a MSM source.  I challenge any Repugs to come up with a similar lengthy list for Democrats.  I was also trying to find links to another study I saw on murderers and rapists and how they voted in their last election, it was tilted around 80/20 in favor of Republicans if memory serves, I'll edit with a link when I can find it.

------
Update:  It seems the Hastert scandal has pretty much buried that study I was talking about after about 5000 or so links with every Google string I can think of...I'll keep trying though.  Case in point though...

Last edited by GorillaTicTacs (2006-11-15 06:10:31)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7030|Argentina

Tetrino wrote:

lowing is fun to argue with. His deployed logic and linguistic skills, not often seen in bf2s, provide very strong competition. We welcome you!
But I find his statements quite reiterative, they all begin and end with "you Liberals", or "damn Liberals".
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

http://www.armchairsubversive.com/

I'll throw my hat in with the "libs" on this one...go to the website above.  Every one listed is a verifiable fact with a link to a MSM source.  I challenge any Repugs to come up with a similar lengthy list for Democrats.  I was also trying to find links to another study I saw on murderers and rapists and how they voted in their last election, it was tilted around 80/20 in favor of Republicans if memory serves, I'll edit with a link when I can find it.

------
Update:  It seems the Hastert scandal has pretty much buried that study I was talking about after about 5000 or so links with every Google string I can think of...I'll keep trying though.  Case in point though...
Already said I will not defend peope like these, if most of them are republicans then so be it, they should be put to sleep regardless. By tallying up a scoreboard on who has the most pedifiles seems kinda pointless. THey are all worthy of death.

Last edited by lowing (2006-11-15 06:27:34)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

sergeriver wrote:

Tetrino wrote:

lowing is fun to argue with. His deployed logic and linguistic skills, not often seen in bf2s, provide very strong competition. We welcome you!
But I find his statements quite reiterative, they all begin and end with "you Liberals", or "damn Liberals".
only when I am arguing a counter-liberal point serge.

If I were arguing with circus clowns I would identify them as such. Damned circus clowns always running around squirting water in my eye with that fake flower!. God I hate circus clowns.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6924|USA

Tetrino wrote:

lowing is fun to argue with. His deployed logic and linguistic skills, not often seen in bf2s, provide very strong competition. We welcome you!
hey thanks
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7030|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Tetrino wrote:

lowing is fun to argue with. His deployed logic and linguistic skills, not often seen in bf2s, provide very strong competition. We welcome you!
But I find his statements quite reiterative, they all begin and end with "you Liberals", or "damn Liberals".
only when I am arguing a counter-liberal point serge.

If I were arguing with circus clowns I would identify them as such. Damned circus clowns always running around squirting water in my eye with that fake flower!. God I hate circus clowns.
So, in your list of annoying things, you have circus clowns and liberals.
The_Shipbuilder
Stay the corpse
+261|6773|Los Angeles

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Uh-oh. All other right-wingers must be exactly alike.
Perhaps some other things could be said about this story that are more important that being on the defensive and covering your own butt?
I thought that if I was, as you say, 'covering my butt' that I, as a conservative, would automatically resort to a personal attack against you.
Launching an offensive attack is not the same thing as protecting one's self. Hawks often willfully confuse the subtle distinction.

By 'covering your butt' I meant that, when confronted with a piece of news about a right-wing wacko, the first instinct is to take it personally, as a threat against one's own pride, and thus to speak out in defense of right-wingers in general.

Another tendency is to resort to personal attacks to break a stalemate or to redirect a losing debate.

I don't mean to imply that conservatives have a monopoly on either tendency - Both are belief-agnostic displays of immaturity.
Tetrino
International OMGWTFBBQ
+200|7003|Uhh... erm...

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Tetrino wrote:

lowing is fun to argue with. His deployed logic and linguistic skills, not often seen in bf2s, provide very strong competition. We welcome you!
But I find his statements quite reiterative, they all begin and end with "you Liberals", or "damn Liberals".
only when I am arguing a counter-liberal point serge.

If I were arguing with circus clowns I would identify them as such. Damned circus clowns always running around squirting water in my eye with that fake flower!. God I hate circus clowns.
Circus clowns... evil buggers. I used to have nightmares about them.
JoeMama
Member
+2|6646|Wyoming

IRONCHEF wrote:

No, this is common right-wing "nut" quality activity.  I guess it's better than assasinating someone.  You know, with dems in power now, this will open up a greater threat level since the right is where all the violent nut-jobs are!  Hell, some on this very forum qualify as those kinds of nuts.  Wouldn't be surprised to hear of one of our psycho neocon nutbag forum members having done something crazy to a Dem leader.
It sound to me like you are the nut bag, spouting crap like this.

News flash- there are nut bags on ALL sides, including the dems.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard