Your eyes are slitty
chinese over chav
♥
im one of the othersToilet Sex wrote:
only have camm, gooners and a couple of others on fb though lol
noice 
chick looks like she got her eyebrows from walmart
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Uzique wrote:
chick looks like she got her eyebrows from walmart
Do you really want to know ?krazed wrote:
i'm afraid to ask this but.....
what kind of porn is it that you like shifty
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
English porn, I'm betting.
"There we are."
"There we are."
Missionary porn. The kind with nuns.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Do you really want to know ?krazed wrote:
i'm afraid to ask this but.....
what kind of porn is it that you like shifty
priests and young boys
called it earlier
called it earlier
♥
nativity plays
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
You're pointing out that the label and what you're charged for something = value => Your own stupidity.Uzique wrote:
i'm pointing out dilbert's stupidity... not qualifying anything elsekrazed wrote:
Uzique wrote:
pretty sure you couldnt buy a button from that outfit with $10
because if people will pay a lot of money for it.... IT HAS TO BE GOOD!
stop being the retard that you are
Fuck Israel
where did i imply value? jesus christ. i just said she dressed herself with more than $10. it was a simple fact of cost. i didn't bestow the statement with any preference or qualifying additions. you're just taking all the rest yourself and trying to argue some pathetic semantics/grammar debate over inferences that don't even exist. great job.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
If you're saying the button costs >$10 then presumably the outfit would be substantially more.
Which is a shame because the overall effect is she looks like she was dressed by a blind man using clothes the homeless shelter didn't want.
Which is a shame because the overall effect is she looks like she was dressed by a blind man using clothes the homeless shelter didn't want.
Fuck Israel
aaaaand now we're back 4-page full-cycle to me stating the simply obvious:
since when did you know squat about fashion?
since when did you know squat about fashion?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
i'd hit it so hard that she'd forever have major trust issues
Less arguing more girl posting plz
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I know that its bullshit - don't need to know any more than that.Uzique wrote:
aaaaand now we're back 4-page full-cycle to me stating the simply obvious:
since when did you know squat about fashion?
You keep swallowing the line you're given and hyping overpriced garbage.
Fuck Israel
Dilbert_X wrote:
I know that its bullshit - don't need to know any more than that.Uzique wrote:
aaaaand now we're back 4-page full-cycle to me stating the simply obvious:
since when did you know squat about fashion?
You keep swallowing the line you're given and hyping overpriced garbage.
FloppY_ wrote:
Less arguing more girl posting plz
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5196/1291578144349.jpg
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/6849/rojas2.jpg
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
mmm pigtails
erm... sorry.. that looks too much like a 14 year old
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
and that weird japanese-meets-seal-thing you keep posting doesn't?
shit is packing more blubber than a hunting ship
shit is packing more blubber than a hunting ship
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
what the fuck kind of 14 year olds live in denmark?FloppY_ wrote:
erm... sorry.. that looks too much like a 14 year old