probably easier if i just link to gf, no?Zimmer wrote:
Yeah, well I guessed that, but if we were to just pin it on physical beauty right now, what would you go for? There's total attraction and then there's basic physical attraction, there must be a sort of beauty that pulls you in more than say... the 14-15 year old girls posted above.Uzique wrote:
girls with a style, something that they commit to... girls that look after themselves... girls that are confident, well thought-out, have a strong personality and a definite sense of taste and 'identity'. nothing identikit or standard; no sheeples or crowd-followers. nobody that doesn't use their head-- for me, conversation is the most attractive part of the equation, not the body the voice is pinned to. don't see the point specifying a particular race, hair-colour, shape, size or smell. attractive girls that are compatible with you - that is, compatible in real life, away from a computer screen and a box of kleenex - have an obvious appeal and 'chemistry' that is more than the sum of their parts. basically i guess you could say i like girls that are a complete package in themselves... nothing fake, nothing that stands out as alarming, and no major deficiencies.
Because at the end of the day, there is no relationship without some sort of physical attraction. Show me a photo of a girl that IF you saw, you'd go up to her to want to know her, simply from her physical looks.
more than 'wanting to know'... being with
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/