LOL.....UN.....LMAO! biggest joke ever!462nd NSP653 wrote:
Okay, I'll agree with that statement in principle but in the real world....good luck with that. And when someone doesn't comply the rest of the world will enforce it by threatening them with....what?sergeriver wrote:
Nukes should be banned for every country in the world, US included. You can't accuse someone of doing the same thing you do.
UN Sanctions?
Poll
Should the U.S. sit and a let it happen or start bombing now?
| U.S. shouldn't say anything about others nukes | 31% | 31% - 40 | ||||
| The U.N. should provide warheads to those who want them | 2% | 2% - 3 | ||||
| We should just nuke them now. | 25% | 25% - 33 | ||||
| We should cease all foreign aid and fund Star Wars | 40% | 40% - 51 | ||||
| Total: 127 | ||||||
im Right wing, republican, and still dont think anyone should have nukes. that is a little too powerful for such a small world.
but then again, i take that back, since sometimes there is a need for them....
but then again, i take that back, since sometimes there is a need for them....
Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal
Cease all foreign aid and concentrate on a missile defence system. Simple as. No brainer.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-04 13:02:41)
I completely agree and anybody that has Vida's ass on their sig has my vote of confidence!Des.Kmal wrote:
im Right wing, republican, and still dont think anyone should have nukes. that is a little too powerful for such a small world.
but then again, i take that back, since sometimes there is a need for them....
no nation state would use nukes. but terrorists.... they would in a heartbeat.arabeater wrote:
No country including Iran and North Korea will use Nukes for the simple fact that if they do they will be wiped off the face of the Earth. Now I do believe that a country will make nukes and give them to a terror group for use. Even if we did invade Iran they wouldnt use a nuke on their own soil, and if for some reason they did they would be in essense killing themselves as well. Nukes are just a psycholigical weapon to make any invader think twice. Just an opinion from a US military member. But as John Kerry would say, I am uneducated, so I am brainless.
The only things I hate are stupid people, in effcientness that wastes time, money, resources and people. I believe in helping people out from under a repressive regime but when they support a goverement that is hostile towards the United States of America. I dont condone the killing of civilians and our military does NOT do that ever on purpose since WWII.Turquoise wrote:
Thanks... I've been accused of being one myself, but I was just taken aback by the hate in your post.Commie Killer wrote:
Well thanks, I usualy agree with you, but I can be a heartless bastard.Turquoise wrote:
I hear Al Quida is recruiting in Baghdad. Care to make the trip? After converting to Islam, you'll fit right in.
Also you haven't really gave me and reason to think you are isolationist until you posted it here. But think about it. When the country is isolationist it starts wars, major wars, like WWII and WWI. Want that to happen again? Then throw in some nukes? Might just be me but I like the idea of living and fighting for something I believe in. A person who thinks nothing worth fighting for is scum, is nothing in my eyes, and is ONLY kept alive by better men and woman who fight for him.
Yea exactly that was my point.norge wrote:
no nation state would use nukes. but terrorists.... they would in a heartbeat.arabeater wrote:
No country including Iran and North Korea will use Nukes for the simple fact that if they do they will be wiped off the face of the Earth. Now I do believe that a country will make nukes and give them to a terror group for use. Even if we did invade Iran they wouldnt use a nuke on their own soil, and if for some reason they did they would be in essense killing themselves as well. Nukes are just a psycholigical weapon to make any invader think twice. Just an opinion from a US military member. But as John Kerry would say, I am uneducated, so I am brainless.
The problem is when they are rules by slightly insane leaders, who tbh would use them as they arent sane.--->[Your]Phobia<--- wrote:
Well....
Russia, the United States, France, China, Great Britain, Israel, Pakistan, and India all have stockpiles of Nukes. I dont see a problem with Iran having them. Its only Bush who thinks everyone is the EAST is a terrorist.. What a dum ass. Oh.... sorry Bush is always right, just like he was right about Iraq LMAO
Even if they have Nukes or are planning on having them thats up to them, they are allowed to use them to defend their country if needs be just as the US and other super powers are.
members of the UN dont even think the UN does anything.arabeater wrote:
LOL.....UN.....LMAO! biggest joke ever!462nd NSP653 wrote:
Okay, I'll agree with that statement in principle but in the real world....good luck with that. And when someone doesn't comply the rest of the world will enforce it by threatening them with....what?sergeriver wrote:
Nukes should be banned for every country in the world, US included. You can't accuse someone of doing the same thing you do.
UN Sanctions?
Yea explain to me again why their is a UN? Anyone....Anyone?norge wrote:
members of the UN dont even think the UN does anything.arabeater wrote:
LOL.....UN.....LMAO! biggest joke ever!462nd NSP653 wrote:
Okay, I'll agree with that statement in principle but in the real world....good luck with that. And when someone doesn't comply the rest of the world will enforce it by threatening them with....what?
UN Sanctions?
Calling someone dumb when you cant even spell some of the most basic words in the English language, wow, the irony.--->[Your]Phobia<--- wrote:
Well....
Russia, the United States, France, China, Great Britain, Israel, Pakistan, and India all have stockpiles of Nukes. I dont see a problem with Iran having them. Its only Bush who thinks everyone is the EAST is a terrorist.. What a dum ass. Oh.... sorry Bush is always right, just like he was right about Iraq LMAO
Even if they have Nukes or are planning on having them thats up to them, they are allowed to use them to defend their country if needs be just as the US and other super powers are.
Last edited by Commie Killer (2006-11-04 13:00:39)
To stall, to cause problems, and to be one of the most annoying organizations of the face of the Earth.arabeater wrote:
Yea explain to me again why their is a UN? Anyone....Anyone?norge wrote:
members of the UN dont even think the UN does anything.arabeater wrote:
LOL.....UN.....LMAO! biggest joke ever!
Oh yea thats exactly what we need. NOT!Commie Killer wrote:
To stall, to cause problems, and to be one of the most annoying organizations of the face of the Earth.arabeater wrote:
Yea explain to me again why their is a UN? Anyone....Anyone?norge wrote:
members of the UN dont even think the UN does anything.
you have nukes, others can have too. remove yours first before flaming others
Many Republicans and Libertarians would agree with you. I do as well, but I know that our military industrial complex won't let that happen.....CameronPoe wrote:
Cease all foreign aid and concentrate on a missile defence system. Simple as. No brainer.
Another example of great spelling...Iraq retard.-=raska=- wrote:
I just dont think Iran will use it or sell it. It's just intimidation (thats the word I was looking for in my last post). Or its a weapon they are preparing in case usa invade them.
Let's say you are really scared about them, USA intervene, the war makes the terrorism increase as everyone starts to hate you, soldiers die, your debts continue to grow up, you will be stuck there as you are in Irak, etc...
Also when a nation state the supports terrorists "under the table" and sometimes in view it is kinda stupid to think they wont use a nuclear weapon if they get one...
We have a first use policy that states we will not use them unless they are used against us or our allies.Ottomania wrote:
you have nukes, others can have too. remove yours first before flaming others
Hmm...let me think, Iran having nukes and then selling them to terror groups for use or US having nukes and not selling them to terror groups for use. Thats a hard decision. I cant decide, can you?Ottomania wrote:
you have nukes, others can have too. remove yours first before flaming others
What do you mean our military industrial complex wont let that happen? Stop foreign aid=more money to spend on other things=more money for military=more money for businesses that supply the military.Turquoise wrote:
Many Republicans and Libertarians would agree with you. I do as well, but I know that our military industrial complex won't let that happen.....CameronPoe wrote:
Cease all foreign aid and concentrate on a missile defence system. Simple as. No brainer.
People are idiots, the world has become to nice and is only gonna get nicer, gotta learn to accept the fact that the population of the uninformed and just plain stupid is gonna go up.arabeater wrote:
Hmm...let me think, Iran having nukes and then selling them to terror groups for use or US having nukes and not selling them to terror groups for use. Thats a hard decision. I cant decide, can you?Ottomania wrote:
you have nukes, others can have too. remove yours first before flaming others
dont call me a retard, english is my second language and in french, Iraq spells Irak... I bet you only speak english...Commie Killer wrote:
Another example of great spelling...Iraq retard.-=raska=- wrote:
I just dont think Iran will use it or sell it. It's just intimidation (thats the word I was looking for in my last post). Or its a weapon they are preparing in case usa invade them.
Let's say you are really scared about them, USA intervene, the war makes the terrorism increase as everyone starts to hate you, soldiers die, your debts continue to grow up, you will be stuck there as you are in Irak, etc...
Also when a nation state the supports terrorists "under the table" and sometimes in view it is kinda stupid to think they wont use a nuclear weapon if they get one...
and thank you to wikipedia, because I didnt know what was a Star Wars, I learnt its a SDI, so I vote for it. Its only a defense program and usa has already started it so why not finish it.
Last edited by -=raska=- (2006-11-04 13:09:21)
You what ? spelling? where? You know people like you should be banned. If you cant contribute to a discussion in a civilised way without trying to take the piss don’t bother. You think you’re smart but you end up making a fool of your self. So please do us all a favour and stfu *ass hole*Commie Killer wrote:
Calling someone dumb when you cant even spell some of the most basic words in the English language, wow, the irony.--->[Your]Phobia<--- wrote:
Well....
Russia, the United States, France, China, Great Britain, Israel, Pakistan, and India all have stockpiles of Nukes. I dont see a problem with Iran having them. Its only Bush who thinks everyone is the EAST is a terrorist.. What a dum ass. Oh.... sorry Bush is always right, just like he was right about Iraq LMAO
Even if they have Nukes or are planning on having them thats up to them, they are allowed to use them to defend their country if needs be just as the US and other super powers are.
Don't be silly. If you concentrate on defence rather than attack then you don't use so many bullets, guns, and vehicles. As such - military industry takes a nosedive.Commie Killer wrote:
What do you mean our military industrial complex wont let that happen? Stop foreign aid=more money to spend on other things=more money for military=more money for businesses that supply the military.Turquoise wrote:
Many Republicans and Libertarians would agree with you. I do as well, but I know that our military industrial complex won't let that happen.....CameronPoe wrote:
Cease all foreign aid and concentrate on a missile defence system. Simple as. No brainer.
This reminds me of a particularly cruel and capitalistic friend of a friend who upon witnessing the towers get hit on 9/11 on TV texted my friend the following: 'Buy defence shares NOW'
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-04 13:10:56)
Actually I am taking German right now. Neither did I know what Star Wars was until I used Google to find it and about it. And it also hasn't been started really because it was supposed to use satellites with lasers mounted on them as the main form of defense, not missiles.-=raska=- wrote:
dont call me a retard, english is my second language and in french, Iraq spells Irak... I bet you only speak english...
and thank you to wikipedia, because I didnt know what was a Star Wars, I learnt its a SDI, so I vote for it. Its only a defense program and usa has already started it so why not finish it.
as far as i know, only one country as actually used nukes to attack another country.... and it wasn't N.K. or iran