| U.S. shouldn't say anything about others nukes | 31% | 31% - 40 | ||||
| The U.N. should provide warheads to those who want them | 2% | 2% - 3 | ||||
| We should just nuke them now. | 25% | 25% - 33 | ||||
| We should cease all foreign aid and fund Star Wars | 40% | 40% - 51 | ||||
| Total: 127 | ||||||
JahManRed wrote:
American created and used the fucking nukes in the first place and escalated an arms race which nearly brought the planet to total destruction. Causing a hundred satellite wars using other poor countries to do their dirty work. You armed Israel with nukes, destabilizing a whole region and now you think you can dictate to other countries who are only responding to the USA's blatant aggression by getting hold of them too. America basically created a list of potential nuclear nations by drafting up a list, the Axis of Evil, a pretext to invade.
Get over yourselves for fuck sakes. Take about calling the kettle black!!
..............,-~*'`¯lllllll`*~,._Miller wrote:
Trained them? WTF is this? We don't have people over there helping in the terrorist training camps. I don't know how you got that we were training them.JahManRed wrote:
The waiting is over!!! You may or may not have armed them, but you trained them.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
I can't wait for the influx of morons who say the US is intentionally arming the insurgency.
Once again more unfounded racist and discriminatory generalizations about muslims from ATG.ATG wrote:
I suspect more there would be dancing in the muslim street.
But...if we let them have it sooner or later the world will find out what it means to let Islamofacist have a nuke.
The problem with these people as the see a nuclear doomsday scenario as something they want.
jonsimon wrote:
Once again more unfounded racist and discriminatory generalizations about muslims from ATG.ATG wrote:
I suspect more there would be dancing in the muslim street.
But...if we let them have it sooner or later the world will find out what it means to let Islamofacist have a nuke.
The problem with these people as the see a nuclear doomsday scenario as something they want.
Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-11-04 10:20:56)
Wake up, buddy. If Iran gets nukes, they can easily supply them to terrorists (they are a terrorist nation, you know). Terrorists will not hesitate to use nukes and there will be no country to accurately pin the blame on if they do so.-=raska=- wrote:
I voted A
The US intervention in Irak is now a mess.. And I dont want that to be repeated in Iran. I dont think it will nuke USA. Many countries have the nuclear bomb since the cold war and there hasnt been any launch. I think its more a psychological weapon.
Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-11-04 10:55:28)
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ0bWEnW_WU [/youtube]jonsimon wrote:
Once again more unfounded racist and discriminatory generalizations about muslims from ATG.ATG wrote:
I suspect more there would be dancing in the muslim street.
But...if we let them have it sooner or later the world will find out what it means to let Islamofacist have a nuke.
The problem with these people as the see a nuclear doomsday scenario as something they want.
Last edited by ATG (2006-11-04 10:34:18)
I believe he means radicals, not the whole fucking region.jonsimon wrote:
Once again more unfounded racist and discriminatory generalizations about muslims from ATG.ATG wrote:
I suspect more there would be dancing in the muslim street.
But...if we let them have it sooner or later the world will find out what it means to let Islamofacist have a nuke.
The problem with these people as the see a nuclear doomsday scenario as something they want.
Last edited by Miller (2006-11-04 10:40:41)
Don't try logic and reasoning with jonsimon. It's much easier for him to just yell "that's racist!" and move on.Miller wrote:
I believe he means radicals, not the whole fucking region.jonsimon wrote:
Once again more unfounded racist and discriminatory generalizations about muslims from ATG.ATG wrote:
I suspect more there would be dancing in the muslim street.
But...if we let them have it sooner or later the world will find out what it means to let Islamofacist have a nuke.
The problem with these people as the see a nuclear doomsday scenario as something they want.
Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-11-04 10:42:19)
If we start bombing the brits and the rest of the world will say "ZOMG THE US ARE SUCH ASSHOLES TO ATTACK MORE PEOPLE, THEY ARE AN EVIL NATION!"ATG wrote:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2436948,00.html
http://i12.tinypic.com/2nrn250.gif
Oh yes, backwards nations with nukes. Is this a result of our inability to restore order in Iraq or a natural progression?
Should the U.S. sit and a let it happen or announce we begin bombing in 48 hours?
They can, but if they do then it'll be obvious where they came from. Radiation signatures can be pinpointed and we can tell where the nuclear material originated.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Wake up, buddy. If Iran gets nukes, they can easily supply them to terrorists (they are a terrorist nation, you know). Terrorists will not hesitate to use nukes and there will be no country to accurately pin the blaim on if they do so.
Well said.....just my thought.....................Fancy_Pollux wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/ … cecard.jpgjonsimon wrote:
Once again more unfounded racist and discriminatory generalizations about muslims from ATG.ATG wrote:
I suspect more there would be dancing in the muslim street.
But...if we let them have it sooner or later the world will find out what it means to let Islamofacist have a nuke.
The problem with these people as the see a nuclear doomsday scenario as something they want.
Generalizations? Stop trying to be "PC", it is no longer just a "generalization". Can I ask you a question, jonsimon? Do actually believe some of the outlandish things you say, or do you just argue for the sake of arguing?
Last edited by Miller (2006-11-04 10:54:31)
It is not that simple. Iran can claim they played no part in it (such as claiming it was stolen, etc), since it would be terrorists that carry out the attack. Let's say China attacks us with a Russian-made nuclear weapon. We aren't going to blame Russia, we are going to blame China. However, terrorists make it very difficult to accurately place the blame on the correct party.Masques wrote:
They can, but if they do then it'll be obvious where they came from. Radiation signatures can be pinpointed and we can tell where the nuclear material originated.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Wake up, buddy. If Iran gets nukes, they can easily supply them to terrorists (they are a terrorist nation, you know). Terrorists will not hesitate to use nukes and there will be no country to accurately pin the blame on if they do so.
Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-11-04 10:55:11)
What do the Brits have to do with half the ME attempting to make some nukes?SoC./Omega wrote:
If we start bombing the brits and the rest of the world will say "ZOMG THE US ARE SUCH ASSHOLES TO ATTACK MORE PEOPLE, THEY ARE AN EVIL NATION!"ATG wrote:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2436948,00.html
http://i12.tinypic.com/2nrn250.gif
Oh yes, backwards nations with nukes. Is this a result of our inability to restore order in Iraq or a natural progression?
Should the U.S. sit and a let it happen or announce we begin bombing in 48 hours?
And pre-emptively attacking them, or threatening to will only give them more reason. The sooner people realise that you can't defeat terrorism with conventional warfare the better off we will be. Conventional warfare causes more terrorism. Just look at the escalating number of terrorist attacks across the globe, and the mess in Iraq.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
If Iran gets nukes, they can easily supply them to terrorists (they are a terrorist nation, you know). Terrorists will not hesitate to use nukes and there will be no country to accurately pin the blaim on if they do so.
