Is Venezuela's President, Hugo Chavez, helping terrorists?

2006-10-19 17:56:46

#1

Harmor: Error_Name_Not_Found; +605|6804|San Diego, CA, USA

Rumor has it that President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is using islands off his coast to setup secret camps for terrorists to help them enter Mexico (giving them Visas), so they can eventually enter the U.S.

At these camps, supposedly, they are teaching them Spanish as well to integrate much better.

If this is true, what should the international community do with Venezuela? What will the U.S. do?

2006-10-19 17:58:47

#2

hurridave: Banned; +8|6658

i need a poo

2006-10-19 18:03:05

#3

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6701|The Land of Scott Walker

We shall meet at the UN and rain down nasty worthless sanctions on them from long range! If it's true, we should build that wall with the electrified razor wire on the southern border that I've mentioned in other threads. Then put snipers a couple hundred yards in, then if they tunnel under, BOOM headshot.

EDIT: they have VISAs though. Hmmm. We must send a Marine sniper in to make a decoration on Hugo's forehead then.

Last edited by Stingray24 (2006-10-19 18:04:45)

2006-10-19 18:03:19

#4

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

I doubt it. I have Venezuelan family and they tell me how stupid chavez is. the majority of venezuelans are fed up with him. Im reconsidering my visit in december though.

2006-10-19 18:03:20

#5

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6965|Wilmington, DE, US

Sounds like another oil rich country needs liberating to me.

2006-10-19 18:05:24

#6

jonsimon: Member; +224|6751

Harmor wrote:
Rumor has it that President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is using islands off his coast to setup secret camps for terrorists to help them enter Mexico (giving them Visas), so they can eventually enter the U.S.

At these camps, supposedly, they are teaching them Spanish as well to integrate much better.

If this is true, what should the international community do with Venezuela? What will the U.S. do?

Didn't they teach you in Middle School that rumors are bad?

2006-10-19 18:09:44

#7

oug: Calmer than you are.; +380|6775|Πάϊ

Ikarti wrote:
Sounds like another oil rich country needs liberating to me.

Ok anyone wanna bet who's gonna be next? $10 says its Iran

_ƒ³

2006-10-19 18:10:21

#8

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6965|Wilmington, DE, US

They got those reserves off the coast of Cuba now too, you know.

2006-10-19 18:12:21

#9

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

oug wrote:
Ikarti wrote:
Sounds like another oil rich country needs liberating to me.
Ok anyone wanna bet who's gonna be next? $10 says its Iran

thats not a very risky bet

2006-10-19 18:13:01

#10

jonsimon: Member; +224|6751

Ikarti wrote:
They got those reserves off the coast of Cuba now too, you know.

Canada has the most Shale oil in the world, and soon we'll be milking that effeciently too. Maybe we'll finally take it once and for all.

2006-10-19 18:13:20

#11

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6965|Wilmington, DE, US

jonsimon wrote:
Ikarti wrote:
They got those reserves off the coast of Cuba now too, you know.
Canada has the most Shale oil in the world, and soon we'll be milking that effeciently too. Maybe we'll finally take it once and for all.

But they have Mounties!

2006-10-19 18:14:36

#12

Stealth42o: She looked 18 to me officer; +175|6928

No more then the US is.

2006-10-19 18:17:23

#13

oug: Calmer than you are.; +380|6775|Πάϊ

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
oug wrote:
Ikarti wrote:
Sounds like another oil rich country needs liberating to me.
Ok anyone wanna bet who's gonna be next? $10 says its Iran
thats not a very risky bet

k forget I said it. Youre right... betting on the favorites is boring. NK more interesting? Remember they too got nukes and a nutcase for a leader.

_ƒ³

2006-10-19 18:19:13

#14

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

oug wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
oug wrote:
Ok anyone wanna bet who's gonna be next? $10 says its Iran
thats not a very risky bet
k forget I said it. Youre right... betting on the favorites is boring. NK more interesting? Remember they too got nukes and a nutcase for a leader.

thats a better bet. I would not doubt for one second our ability to defeat North Korea conventionally....but it will be a much tougher and longer and bloodier fight. And I dont know if the American public will allow that.

personally I hear its too cold over there and Im a desert kinda guy

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-10-19 18:19:51)

2006-10-19 18:50:18

#15

jonsimon: Member; +224|6751

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
oug wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

thats not a very risky bet
k forget I said it. Youre right... betting on the favorites is boring. NK more interesting? Remember they too got nukes and a nutcase for a leader.
thats a better bet. I would not doubt for one second our ability to defeat North Korea conventionally....but it will be a much tougher and longer and bloodier fight. And I dont know if the American public will allow that.

personally I hear its too cold over there and Im a desert kinda guy

I doubt our ability to defeat anyone. I haven't seen a W in a long time.

2006-10-19 19:03:34

#16

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
oug wrote:

k forget I said it. Youre right... betting on the favorites is boring. NK more interesting? Remember they too got nukes and a nutcase for a leader.
thats a better bet. I would not doubt for one second our ability to defeat North Korea conventionally....but it will be a much tougher and longer and bloodier fight. And I dont know if the American public will allow that.

personally I hear its too cold over there and Im a desert kinda guy
I doubt our ability to defeat anyone. I haven't seen a W in a long time.

why would you say that. every single engagement I had with the enemy was chalked up as a victory. Dont confuse military with political. remember

https://ecc.07770500.com/NewsSports/News/Camera%20vedio.jpg

is the terrorists only real weapon

2006-10-19 19:09:12

#17

jonsimon: Member; +224|6751

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

thats a better bet. I would not doubt for one second our ability to defeat North Korea conventionally....but it will be a much tougher and longer and bloodier fight. And I dont know if the American public will allow that.

personally I hear its too cold over there and Im a desert kinda guy
I doubt our ability to defeat anyone. I haven't seen a W in a long time.
why would you say that. every single engagement I had with the enemy was chalked up as a victory. Dont confuse military with political. remember

http://ecc.07770500.com/NewsSports/News … 0vedio.jpg is the terrorists only real weapon

When was the last time we defeated an army? WWII?

2006-10-19 19:11:20

#18

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

Oif, but honestly, thats a non issue. the rounds coming my direction from a far didnt care if they were from a standing conventional army or from an insurgent. why doesnt the god damn news report how many god damn insurgents are killed everyday in iraq instead of how many civilians or coalition forces bite it!?!?!?! this is why people think were losing in iraq, the fucking media only wants to portray the picture of defeat so they snatch up those ratings. the public doesnt wanna hear about the multitude of enemy combatants that are no longer breathing. you only hear about those engagements once in a very far while but trust me, they die everyday. no iraq bodycount right there

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-10-19 19:14:50)

2006-10-19 19:13:14

#19

jonsimon: Member; +224|6751

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Oif

In war, it ain't how many perfectly good human lives you waste, it's how many you force to surrender.

2006-10-19 19:13:25

#20

RedTwizzler: I do it for the lulz.; +124|6793|Chicago

jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
jonsimon wrote:

I doubt our ability to defeat anyone. I haven't seen a W in a long time.
why would you say that. every single engagement I had with the enemy was chalked up as a victory. Dont confuse military with political. remember

http://ecc.07770500.com/NewsSports/News … 0vedio.jpg is the terrorists only real weapon
When was the last time we defeated an army? WWII?

Indeed. Korea was guerillas, Vietnam was guerillas, Somalia was guerillas, Iraq was civilians... I mean guerillas.

2006-10-19 19:15:54

#21

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Oif
In war, it ain't how many perfectly good human lives you waste, it's how many you force to surrender.

umm actually, it is how many "perfectly good" human lives you waste.

Violence of action and the ability to meet reach and exceed any objective that has been given.

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-10-19 19:17:07)

2006-10-19 19:17:57

#22

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

RedTwizzler wrote:
jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

why would you say that. every single engagement I had with the enemy was chalked up as a victory. Dont confuse military with political. remember

http://ecc.07770500.com/NewsSports/News … 0vedio.jpg is the terrorists only real weapon
When was the last time we defeated an army? WWII?
Indeed. Korea was guerillas, Vietnam was guerillas, Somalia was guerillas, Iraq was civilians... I mean guerillas.

any more gems of wisdom?

2006-10-19 19:18:02

#23

jonsimon: Member; +224|6751

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Oif
In war, it ain't how many perfectly good human lives you waste, it's how many you force to surrender.
umm actually, it is how many "perfectly good" human lives you waste.

Violence of action and the ability to meet reach and exceed any objective that has been given.

Kill em all and there's noone left to pay you tribute. Sorry, but it's all about surrender.

2006-10-19 19:19:47

#24

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6900

jonsimon wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
jonsimon wrote:
In war, it ain't how many perfectly good human lives you waste, it's how many you force to surrender.
umm actually, it is how many "perfectly good" human lives you waste.

Violence of action and the ability to meet reach and exceed any objective that has been given.
Kill em all and there's noone left to pay you tribute. Sorry, but it's all about surrender.

dude, Im a soldier, not a politician, not a civilian. yes. yes, kill them all. try to look at this with some form of objectivity. soldiers dont give a damn about tribute, thats for the civies back home to argue about.

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-10-19 19:20:24)

2006-10-19 19:21:25

#25

kr@cker: Bringin' Sexy Back!; +581|6805|Southeastern USA

Stingray24 wrote:
We shall meet at the UN and rain down nasty worthless sanctions on them from long range! If it's true, we should build that wall with the electrified razor wire on the southern border that I've mentioned in other threads. Then put snipers a couple hundred yards in, then if they tunnel under, BOOM headshot.

EDIT: they have VISAs though. Hmmm. We must send a Marine sniper in to make a decoration on Hugo's forehead then.

we shall have kofi write him a letter, maybe in all caps, just so he knows how bad he is and that he is wrong

BF2S Forums Is Venezuela's President, Hugo Chavez, helping terrorists?

Harmor wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

oug wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

oug wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

oug wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

oug wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

oug wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

oug wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

RedTwizzler wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Board footer