Topic closed
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-10-13 05:33:23)
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
holy shit, a reporter in a warzone, in the middle of a crossfire, gets killed.....I bet if he was doing the local fucking weather hed still be a live. WTF do you think happens in battle "Hey TIME OUT we got a reporter on the field, dont shoot till theyre in a safe distance" "HEY HAJI! DONT SHOOT AT US TILL THIS JOURNALIST GETS THEIR STORY, OK GUYS...THANKS" you got a small childs perception of the world dick
Charming!GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
holy shit, a reporter in a warzone, in the middle of a crossfire, gets killed.....I bet if he was doing the local fucking weather hed still be a live. WTF do you think happens in battle "Hey TIME OUT we got a reporter on the field, dont shoot till theyre in a safe distance" you got a small childs perception of the world dick
wow, did you even read the article?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
holy shit, a reporter in a warzone, in the middle of a crossfire, gets killed.....I bet if he was doing the local fucking weather hed still be a live. WTF do you think happens in battle "Hey TIME OUT we got a reporter on the field, dont shoot till theyre in a safe distance" "HEY HAJI! DONT SHOOT AT US TILL THIS JOURNALIST GETS THEIR STORY, OK GUYS...THANKS" you got a small childs perception of the world dick
yeah, hard to tell the difference between a microphone and an RPG in the heat of combat.Telegraph.co.uk wrote:
Mr Lloyd was shot in the back after his vehicle - clearly marked "Press" - was caught up in US and Iraqi crossfire, then shot in the head by American forces as he was taken away in a minibus for medical treatment.
Lol, your wit knows no boundskr@cker wrote:
that's right, there's a big red light that flashes when "battle" ensues, and once it stops flashing all the insurgents and coalition soldiers just secure their weapons, and join each other for tea and scones
Gee sorry for flying of the handle like that,GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
not even worth explain. I find it weird how a person could be purposely shot in the back inside a vehicle. if you coulndt understand that part then there aint no point in explaining what might or might not have happened. i read the article and i re-read the article. and it really doesnt tell you very much on the position of the vehicle or the timing of the actual fire fight. but, like a dumb ass peice of shit you are showing yourself to be along with dick white, you are jumping to conclusions already assuming you know the whole story.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-10-13 05:55:33)
Last edited by DoctorFruitloop (2006-10-13 06:00:25)
Gunslinger. You have issues. Maybe next time it's your turn to go out there just take a little time to explore the possibilities of getting some therapy first. You illustrate everything I say is wrong with the US occupation and you make yourself look rather retarded at the same time, so thanksGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
i could have given a fuck less if a I saw a van that said press in the middle between my enemy and my position. I let round fly and the van gets hit, hey, maybe they should have chosen a different profession. I would rather be in a warzone with a rifle than a camera, but hey, thats just me. you dont know much outside your sheltered little bubble. I laugh, LAUGH at the fact that you think this is an outrage. god damn it, he made the decision to be put in harms way and not even fight back, and when he dies because hes put in that position that he chose to be in, you yell murder. dude, LOL, whatever man. yeah he was murdered, yeah american soldiers are monsters that eat little tiny children as appetizers before they start to rape and pillage. is that what you wanna year dick white? you are funny. get a life and or fucking move to iraq and fight for what you believe in and become another victim of a 5.56 round. rich boy.
ummm....ok?DoctorFruitloop wrote:
And you sir are just demonstrating why the majority of the civilised world views the US armed forces as a bunch of trigger happy hicks.
So much for "DEBATE AND SEROUS TALK"
you know why?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
....the majority of the civilised world also avoids military conflict with the united states military....
The Telegraph wrote:
He said that American forces were willing to open fire on civilians and were not prevented from doing so by their commanders.
Sorce: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh … loyd11.xmlThe Telegraph wrote:
His vehicle was clearly marked as "Press" and the fatal shot was fired as he was driven away in an ambulance.
What? Does my statement say it is my view? NO. I normally stay out of the whole US bash thing but in this instance you are displaying a completely irrational stand.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
ummm....ok?DoctorFruitloop wrote:
And you sir are just demonstrating why the majority of the civilised world views the US armed forces as a bunch of trigger happy hicks.
So much for "DEBATE AND SEROUS TALK"
Last edited by DoctorFruitloop (2006-10-13 06:05:18)
you know what, and i dont give a fuck how it sounds. FUCK HIM. let him rot in his grave. we got fucking little tiny children losing their limbs every fucking day over there and you guys wanna cry about a reporter who chose to put himself in harms way. where is the outrage at the insurgents who blow themselves up in a market place or a mosque? where is the verbal attacks. a fucking reporter? where the hell are all your peoples priorities. I dont see a god damn thing that was done wrong in this situation.DoctorFruitloop wrote:
What? Does my statement say it is my view? NO. I normally stay out of the whole US bash thing but in this instance you are displaying a completely irrational stand.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
ummm....ok?DoctorFruitloop wrote:
And you sir are just demonstrating why the majority of the civilised world views the US armed forces as a bunch of trigger happy hicks.
So much for "DEBATE AND SEROUS TALK"
I normally defend the US as a whole and admire the bravery of their armed forces, as I do the British Armed Forces, going into situations that I can only imagine, but your total disrespect for a man who has been unlawfully killed by American troops just reinforces what a large proportion think of the US's approach to armed conflict.
dont confuse the sentiment of this thread with facts and common sense. American soldiers have horns on their helmets and blood dripping from their chins, remember?{BMF}*Frank_The_Tank wrote:
I just read this article on yahoo..........This isnt the first time a reporter was killed in a war zone. The article says he was shot in the back by Iraqis, and their truck was stopped by a truck full of Iraqis and they were fired upon by them....hence why he was shot in the back. The mini-van which was acting as an ambulance was picking up wounded Iraqi soldiers after the U.S. opened fire on them. The man wasnt purposely shot in the head by U.S. soldiers....hes in the middle of a fire fight, he happened to catch a round. It sucks, yes, but its not like one of our guys walked up and executed him.
Topic closed