Without the uk, u.s would have been at war with the whole world (expect isreal). i have no doubt friendship will remain long after Bush and Blair have stepped down.
garbagemafia996630 wrote:
Without the uk, u.s would have been at war with the whole world (
I like soccer
Wasn't the Red Cross the ones that demanded the detainees have curtains for privacy. . .and then the detainees did exactly what the guards knew they would and hanged themselves since they had the 'privacy' to get away with it.....
And I love all the US bashing in this thread. Shows that people from the UK can really think for themselves.
And I love all the US bashing in this thread. Shows that people from the UK can really think for themselves.
u.k is the dogs bollocks !!!
I refuse to look at the UK as a poodle to the US. After their valiant defense of England during WW2 and the undying pride and resolute defiance to the Nazi war machine, I have nothing but respect for them. They are NOBODY'S poodle!!!! They can and do speak for themselves, their history shows this.CameronPoe wrote:
BBC wrote:
The US government has rebuffed UK calls to close its controversial detention centre at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
The UK foreign minister said it was unacceptable on human rights grounds and ineffective in fighting terrorism.For those with an aversion to the BBC, i.e those that prefer 'fair and balanced' news:BBC wrote:
The presence of UK armed forces in Iraq "exacerbates the security problems" and they should "get out some time soon", the head of the British Army has said.
Chief of the General Staff Sir Richard Dannatt told the Daily Mail that the military campaign fought in 2003 had "effectively kicked the door in".
He also said that initial planning for the post-war period had been poor.Troubled relationship? I wonder how long the once-proud UK can continue to pander to the US like a little fluffy poodle.FOX News wrote:
LONDON — Britain's new army chief called for a withdrawal of British troops from Iraq, warning that the military's presence there only exacerbates security problems, according to an interview published Thursday.
Gen. Richard Dannatt described British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Iraq policies as "naive," declaring that while Iraqis might have welcomed coalition forces following the ouster of Saddam Hussein, the good will has since evaporated after years of violence.
Which ones would those be?Kmarion wrote:
Already coming up with theories..lol
My great great great uncle who fought in the war of 1812 is laughing in his grave right now.commissargizz wrote:
Who cares...ditch the US....let's start thinking for ourselves again....
That would be a great slogan for the next British canidate.