Poll

Who is the most extreme 'Neo-Con' on the D&ST forum?

Lowing26%26% - 32
Horseman 775%5% - 6
Rawls4%4% - 5
usmarine200521%21% - 25
Miller1%1% - 2
Major_Spittle5%5% - 7
Atg15%15% - 19
unnamednewbie130%0% - 1
Capt. Foley2%2% - 3
Other15%15% - 19
Total: 119
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7021|Cambridge (UK)

lowing wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

lowing wrote:

2. SO I guess EVERYONE who is born poor and makes something of themselves is nothing more than lucky, hard work, dedication, ambition have nothing to with it. There are a ton of govt. programs set up to help people who want it. Problem is, you have to some work for yourself as well to achieve.

3. They were British in the literal sense, their loyalties were however anything but. If I were born in England to American parents then I am hardly British.

4. no , I completely understand what you are saying, and I say, knock yourself out, we will keep our borders up thanks. You are nuts

5. Great call it what you want..........Only fair since my definintion of liberal is socialist/communist. But, I still have the dictionary on my side.

6.Oh so the people locked up explained why they were locked up huh?? Sounds good, can't see any holes in that.

You also might wanna check your history, during WW2 we locked up people for something worse than there anti American religion. We locked them up for their race.
2. That's not what I'm saying - of course the poor can lift themselves out of poverty, but the rich of any country start with a huge advantage over the poor - they can afford the best education and the best of everything - the poor don't have that priveledge and so have to work far far harder to make anything of their lives.

3. If you own a British passport and/or have British Citizenship you are British. Just if I were to move to America and get American Citizenship and an American passport - I would then be American.

4. As I said before, I may be nuts, but that's irrelevant.

5. Good, then we agree on the meaning of 'Anarchy' for the purpose of this discussion and I'm happy to use your definition of 'liberal'.

6. Yep. After they were released. Released by the Americans, who (possibly coincidentaly) were under pressure from the rest of the international community to release any non-combatants, when they realised that hey, these guys aren't combatants, they're just innocent british muslems who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. They didn't do this straight away though, oh no, of course not, first they deprived them of their human rights. Rights that, even if they were enemy combatants, they had under the Geneva Convention.
2. ok, so now we are getting somewhere. You will admit then that people that are able bodied have the ability and the programs in place to improve their situation. It is just a matter of wiether or not they choose to. So what if the rich have an advantage, is their any chance that they might have worked to become rich? Isn't a comfortable life and financial freedom the goal of most of us? They got theirs, it is up to us to get ours. THe rich are the ones providing the jobs so the rest of us can improve our lives.

3. Fine, take it. But they are MEsterns born in England they obviously had no loyalties to England whatsoever but again on the literal stance you are correct.

4. We will let that one go as well.

5. we will agree here as well.

6. Sorry after the terrorism that is going on in the world I really don't care. I would even applaude the deportation of all muslims in America. Yup I know on this issue that goes against my libertarian ideals and I can not defend feeling this way except to say  I feel the Muslim religion goes against everything American, and the 2 beliefs are oil and water. I guess if you want to remeove all countries and borders, I can get away with this one.

there, only 2 more to go. lol
2. I don't agree that "it is just a matter of whether or not they choose to" - we all have natural limitations but those that are born rich are less limited by their limitations.

3. We can say very little about their true loyalties. Only they could have told us what their true loyalties were. But now they're dead.

6. Except 'the muslim religion' doesn't go against everything American, or even everything Christian. So called 'Islamic extremists' aren't Islamic in the eyes of a large number (possibly even the majority) of muslims. Islamic extremists are as Islamic as David Coresh was a Christian.

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-10-15 20:58:07)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6906|USA

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:


2. That's not what I'm saying - of course the poor can lift themselves out of poverty, but the rich of any country start with a huge advantage over the poor - they can afford the best education and the best of everything - the poor don't have that priveledge and so have to work far far harder to make anything of their lives.

3. If you own a British passport and/or have British Citizenship you are British. Just if I were to move to America and get American Citizenship and an American passport - I would then be American.

4. As I said before, I may be nuts, but that's irrelevant.

5. Good, then we agree on the meaning of 'Anarchy' for the purpose of this discussion and I'm happy to use your definition of 'liberal'.

6. Yep. After they were released. Released by the Americans, who (possibly coincidentaly) were under pressure from the rest of the international community to release any non-combatants, when they realised that hey, these guys aren't combatants, they're just innocent british muslems who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. They didn't do this straight away though, oh no, of course not, first they deprived them of their human rights. Rights that, even if they were enemy combatants, they had under the Geneva Convention.
2. ok, so now we are getting somewhere. You will admit then that people that are able bodied have the ability and the programs in place to improve their situation. It is just a matter of wiether or not they choose to. So what if the rich have an advantage, is their any chance that they might have worked to become rich? Isn't a comfortable life and financial freedom the goal of most of us? They got theirs, it is up to us to get ours. THe rich are the ones providing the jobs so the rest of us can improve our lives.

3. Fine, take it. But they are MEsterns born in England they obviously had no loyalties to England whatsoever but again on the literal stance you are correct.

4. We will let that one go as well.

5. we will agree here as well.

6. Sorry after the terrorism that is going on in the world I really don't care. I would even applaude the deportation of all muslims in America. Yup I know on this issue that goes against my libertarian ideals and I can not defend feeling this way except to say  I feel the Muslim religion goes against everything American, and the 2 beliefs are oil and water. I guess if you want to remeove all countries and borders, I can get away with this one.

there, only 2 more to go. lol
2. I don't agree that "it is just a matter of whether or not they choose to" - we all have natural limitations but those that are born rich are less limited by their limitations.

3. We can say very little about their true loyalties. Only they could have told us what their true loyalties were. But now they're dead.

6. Except 'the muslim religion' doesn't go against everything American, or even everything Christian. So called 'Islamic extremists' aren't Islamic in the eyes of a large number (possibly even the majority) of muslims. Islamic extremists are as Islamic as David Coresh was a Christian.
2. I am not saying getting rich from poverty is easy, but damn, getting a high school education or a GED and going to a trade school and getting a middle class life is not exactly a hopeless cause if you really wanted it. Able bodied people have no excuse.

3. Uhhhh, they blew up your rail and killed 39 innocent people, not much left to assume whith where their loyalties lie.

6. I wish I could believe that, but, when the "majority" do not stand up or even speak out against terrorism, I can draw a pretty reasonable conclusion. Also, the "majority" sure let the world know how they felt about the Popes comments and cartoons of Muhommed, yet, they do nothing in protest of the perversion of their so called religion. I feel the reason for this is they approve of it. I said it before, the KKK is an extremist Christian group, yet they are left beat down at every rally they try to hold by the "majority". I expect the same thing from muslims.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7021|Cambridge (UK)
YAWN! I'm bored of this. I was actually hoping to get a few more people in on the debate, so that I could make up my mind on who to vote for... Oh well...

Anyhoo, I think both ATG and lowing should be disqualified - ATG because he can't hold together a cogent argument for long enough to qualify as a neo-con, and lowing because of his self-confessed libertarian leanings.

So, anybody else want to step up to the plate?
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6784|Global Command
What would you care to debate besides religion.
( 9 month old daughter in lap feeding on bottle = me pecking with one hand.)
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6906|USA
ummmm the socialist/communist/liberal party????? hehehehe
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7021|Cambridge (UK)
Maybe you should let her doing the typing - she might be able to hold together a cogent argument for more than half-a-dozen posts...
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6784|Global Command

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Maybe you should let her doing the typing - she might be able to hold together a cogent argument for more than half-a-dozen posts...
lol


Its funny, other forum liberals often times give me  a tip-o-the hat.
Maybe you haven't posted anything I felt passionate enough to  really respond to, or perhaps your just more deep than them.

Keep trying though. Know you are not likely to annoy me, I've seen other self admiring cocksure wanna be  brainiacs come and go here.

There is more of a cult of personality dominating these forums than a battle of ideas.
If you have a good personality, you are more likely to be drawn into a good debate and have people join in.

I still can't figure out why my posts get so much attention.


for what it's worth; I welcome your noobness and look forward to more cogent discussions with you perhaps the second Tuesday of next week.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7021|Cambridge (UK)

ATG wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Maybe you should let her doing the typing - she might be able to hold together a cogent argument for more than half-a-dozen posts...
lol


Its funny, other forum liberals often times give me  a tip-o-the hat.
Maybe you haven't posted anything I felt passionate enough to  really respond to, or perhaps your just more deep than them.
Perhaps I am (more deep) and perhaps I'm not a liberal.

ATG wrote:

Keep trying though. Know you are not likely to annoy me, I've seen other self admiring cocksure wanna be  brainiacs come and go here.
Me too.

ATG wrote:

There is more of a cult of personality dominating these forums than a battle of ideas.
If you have a good personality, you are more likely to be drawn into a good debate and have people join in.
Agreed.

ATG wrote:

I still can't figure out why my posts get so much attention.
Me too.

ATG wrote:

for what it's worth; I welcome your noobness and look forward to more cogent discussions with you perhaps the second Tuesday of next week.
Unfortunately I'm not free until the 3rd Tuesday.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6784|Global Command
Okay smarty pants.
I posted here;
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=49116

and stopped the debate. Why don't you post something there?
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6723

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

So, anybody else want to step up to the plate?
Colfax! USmarine! Cpt Foley! unamednewbie!
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6906|USA

ATG wrote:

Okay smarty pants.
I posted here;
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=49116

and stopped the debate. Why don't you post something there?
Yeah go post somewhere else, this thread is for lowing bashing,  NOW GIT!!!!
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7021|Cambridge (UK)

ATG wrote:

Okay smarty pants.
I posted here;
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=49116

and stopped the debate. Why don't you post something there?
1. Because I can't actually figure out what the point is that you were trying to make in that thread.
2. I don't know enough about the subject.
3. I can't be arsed.

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-10-17 19:20:04)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6784|Global Command

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

ATG wrote:

Okay smarty pants.
I posted here;
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=49116

and stopped the debate. Why don't you post something there?
1. Because I can't actually figure out what the point is that you were trying to make in that thread.
2. I don't know enough about the subject.
3. I can't be arsed.
1. Can't you read?
2. kudos for being honest.
3. I dunno about that.


edit


the point was that a wider confrontation may be exactly what is needed, just to bring you up to speed.

lol that you accuse me of having no cogent thought but cannot answer a post of mine at all!

Last edited by ATG (2006-10-17 19:31:57)

Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7021|Cambridge (UK)

ATG wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

ATG wrote:

Okay smarty pants.
I posted here;
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=49116

and stopped the debate. Why don't you post something there?
1. Because I can't actually figure out what the point is that you were trying to make in that thread.
2. I don't know enough about the subject.
3. I can't be arsed.
1. Can't you read?
2. kudos for being honest.
3. I dunno about that.

edit

the point was that a wider confrontation may be exactly what is needed, just to bring you up to speed.
I wouldn't use the word 'needed', but I would use the word 'inevitable'.

ATG wrote:

lol that you accuse me of having no cogent thought but cannot answer a post of mine at all!
I couldn't answer it 'cos it isn't cogent enough.

Oh, and 'arsed' is British for 'bothered'.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard