BF2S Forums Who is the most extreme 'Neo-Con' on the D&ST forum?

I just want to know one thing: how many recounts can we demand?

lowing wrote:

Cougar wrote:

lowing wrote:

lol, ya really coulda ellaborated on that.
that list is the foundation of what I believe. What is it then, that you don't agree with?

Perhaps, it isn't that I disagree with your values or where you stand, so much as, I just flat out don't like you.  You know how some people just get on your bad side and you don't quite know why and you really don't have a good reason to dislike them, but you do?

Yeah, you're that person, I just don't like you.  Period.

Yeah, I know what ya mean, but all you have to judge me on are my posts, soooooooooooo if you admit that you can't disagree with them, you really have nothing else to dislike, since there is nothing else about me that you know.

Are ya sure the problem is, you can't justify your beliefs when they are countered with reason, reality and truth??

Don't make it more complicated than it is.  I think you're a douche bag, end of story.  I don't really need a reason, but if you really want one, the fact you have interrogated me on why I don't like you, makes me think that you are a douche bag.

You are a douche bag.

lowing wrote:

I beleive, as you all well know in:

1. PERSONAL RESPONISIBILITY

2. helping only those that help themselves, and those that have reasons why they can't, ( children, and disabled)

3. defend our selves and our allies.

4. border control and arrest and deport ALL that are here illegally.

5. total freedom, except in instances that deny someone else their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. With that goes the consequences, good or bad, for your actions.

6. punishment that fits the crime.

I gotta ask.........What is it that makes me so "extreme"??

Seeing as nobody else will answer you and you seem so desperate for an answer, I'll give you one (and an answer):

1. Fine, no problem with that.
2. I assume you would extend some help to more than just children and the disabled? Say the poor for example? or do all those starving third world populations fall into the category of 'those that do not help themselves' for you?
3. Defend, yes. Invade, NO! Outstay your welcome, NO! Conduct military action in a country that didn't invite you and then say that 'they want us there', HELL NO!
4. There should be no borders.
5. That's anarchy. Fine by me.
6. Punishment that truely fits the crime, yes. Locking people up and denying them their human rights because you suspect them of being islamic, NO!

ATG wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

3. Defend, yes. Invade, NO! Outstay your welcome, NO! Conduct military action in a country that didn't invite you and then say that 'they want us there', HELL NO!
4. There should be no borders.!

FYI thats a painfull level of stupidity your displaying there pal.

Your post displays a painful level of stupidity (for a start it's "you're" not "your").

One can defend oneself and ones allies without the need to define borders.

And all the things I said "NO!" to are immoral.

ATG wrote:

you say you're, I say your.
I drunk, but your still little.

And that's displaying your intelligence is it?

ATG wrote:

I never claimed to be anything.

I never said you did.

ATG wrote:

I merely stated that your post was absurd.

And I yours.

ATG wrote:

'stupidity' may have been a little harsh, I'm sorry if I hrt your feelings.

I'm not the one resorting to personal attacks.

ATG wrote:

'stupidity' may have been a little harsh, I'm sorry if I hrt your feelings.

The point of "I'm not the one resorting to personal attacks" is that you didn't hurt my feelings at all, but from your resorting to implying that I'm "brain dead", "an ignoramous" and "you wank" it appears I did hurt yours.

ATG wrote:

It's just a shock to the senses when teenagers pontificate.
I lost my cool.
My bad.

I'm 33.

ATG wrote:

Now, I never would have suspected that you were 33 based on your posts.

Why so?

ATG wrote:

As a nice gesture, I'll delete the pix.

Meh. Like I said - you didn't hurt my feelings - I've been called far far worse over the last 33 years.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

ATG wrote:

Now, I never would have suspected that you were 33 based on your posts.

Why so?

ATG wrote:

As a nice gesture, I'll delete the pix.

Meh. Like I said - you didn't hurt my feelings - I've been called far far worse over the last 33 years.

Said it before, and I'll say it again: age is an invalid benchmark for knowledge/intelligence.

Too true. ATG brought it up, I was just correcting his incorrect assumption that I was a teenager.

( that's just given me another idea for the "Most irrelevant thing..." thread...)

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-10-14 00:15:53)

ATG wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

ATG wrote:

Now, I never would have suspected that you were 33 based on your posts.

Why so?

Heres an example within this thread.

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

3. Defend, yes. Invade, NO! Outstay your welcome, NO! Conduct military action in a country that didn't invite you and then say that 'they want us there', HELL NO!
4. There should be no borders.

And why does that make you think that I'm a teenager?

ATG wrote:

"There should be no borders."

That, to me, is such an idiotic sentiment that one would have to be juvenile to think it.

Why don't you explain why you feel nations shouldn't have borders, this should be entertaining.

That's simple. I feel there should be no borders because I feel there should be no nations. We are all just human citizens of the universe. Fullstop.

ATG wrote:

Exactly what I was talking about.
Utopia.
What about reality?

What your reality or my reality?

In my reality we are all equal. No nation. No creed. No colour.

So you have a problem with equality? or with the fact that people live in differing 'realities'?

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-10-14 00:44:43)