He's been a bit banned lately.cpt.fass1 wrote:
and horseman hasn't been on in a while.. And all he really says is Clinton got oral anyway
Poll
Who is the most extreme 'Neo-Con' on the D&ST forum?
| Lowing | 26% | 26% - 32 | ||||
| Horseman 77 | 5% | 5% - 6 | ||||
| Rawls | 4% | 4% - 5 | ||||
| usmarine2005 | 21% | 21% - 25 | ||||
| Miller | 1% | 1% - 2 | ||||
| Major_Spittle | 5% | 5% - 7 | ||||
| Atg | 15% | 15% - 19 | ||||
| unnamednewbie13 | 0% | 0% - 1 | ||||
| Capt. Foley | 2% | 2% - 3 | ||||
| Other | 15% | 15% - 19 | ||||
| Total: 119 | ||||||
Good RiddenceDesertFox423 wrote:
He's been a bit banned lately.cpt.fass1 wrote:
and horseman hasn't been on in a while.. And all he really says is Clinton got oral anyway
horseman got banned for inappropriate thinking by a mod that shall go unnamed.
It's good to know I have one vote.
ps
I named Lowing as capitan and chief of war planning and propaganda when I won the election, partly because I feel he is more consistant in his conservative views.
I'm more of a war monger than a neocon.
Some people have figured out that I like to argue; sometimes to see if you've thought your side through, sometimes just for the sake of argument.
But yeah, a agnostic pothead whos a big believer in reincarnation and animisim voted "Warmongering Oil-Guzzling Neo-Con Leader "...funny shit.
I named Lowing as capitan and chief of war planning and propaganda when I won the election, partly because I feel he is more consistant in his conservative views.
I'm more of a war monger than a neocon.
Some people have figured out that I like to argue; sometimes to see if you've thought your side through, sometimes just for the sake of argument.
But yeah, a agnostic pothead whos a big believer in reincarnation and animisim voted "Warmongering Oil-Guzzling Neo-Con Leader "...funny shit.
Last edited by ATG (2006-10-11 15:51:45)
unnamednewbie, ATG, usmarine, rawls and miller are not neo-cons. They are your moderate conservatives (centre-right), that's all.
I would say this is a battle between lowing and Major_Spittle. On balance, I would have to say the latter was more extreme (but not by much)
I would say this is a battle between lowing and Major_Spittle. On balance, I would have to say the latter was more extreme (but not by much)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
I like warmongering. Yeah, that's about the most I'll touch in one topic. Sometimes, I just argue blantlessly with no point what so ever to piss everyone off because I get tired of everyone being so serious about debating.Spark wrote:
unnamednewbie, ATG, usmarine, rawls and miller are not neo-cons. They are your moderate conservatives (centre-right), that's all.
I would say this is a battle between lowing and Major_Spittle. On balance, I would have to say the latter was more extreme (but not by much)
Spit is like Micheal Savage. He's shocking and over the top, yet there are pearls of wisdom occasionally.
Lowing is like Sean Hanity; he probably is well dressed and good looking, plays a mean game of chess.
It brings up somethng I've been wondering lately;
Where does a fiscally conservative, social liberal, preemptive and nationalistic, if we're gonna be the world police do it right, guy go?
To what party would I best fit in?
I must admit anarchist leanings as I am generally hostile towards LE types and government buttheads.
Lowing is like Sean Hanity; he probably is well dressed and good looking, plays a mean game of chess.
It brings up somethng I've been wondering lately;
Where does a fiscally conservative, social liberal, preemptive and nationalistic, if we're gonna be the world police do it right, guy go?
To what party would I best fit in?
I must admit anarchist leanings as I am generally hostile towards LE types and government buttheads.
Nice description, I could picture him being Sean Hannity debating with these guys.ATG wrote:
Lowing is like Sean Hanity; he probably is well dressed and good looking, plays a mean game of chess.
Yeah, I'd place them both in the same IQ bracket, namely, the bottom.Miller wrote:
Nice description, I could picture him being Sean Hannity debating with these guys.ATG wrote:
Lowing is like Sean Hanity; he probably is well dressed and good looking, plays a mean game of chess.
I was kind of freaked out when I clicked on this topic for the first time.
Actually, to me, at first, lowing seemed like a drunk redneck living in KKK territory. But he's okay once you get to know him. j/k lol
Last edited by Spearhead (2006-10-11 15:51:52)
I'd put them at the top, almost as close to the top as Reagan was.jonsimon wrote:
Yeah, I'd place them both in the same IQ bracket, namely, the bottom.Miller wrote:
Nice description, I could picture him being Sean Hannity debating with these guys.ATG wrote:
Lowing is like Sean Hanity; he probably is well dressed and good looking, plays a mean game of chess.
He's a cool dude, but he takes things to the extreme. That's why I voted him. He's an extremist. And you know what they say, that extremes touch each other.Spearhead wrote:
Actually, to me, at first, lowing seemed like a drunk redneck living in KKK territory. But he's okay once you get to know him. j/k lol
105 is not near the top. But since you guys put so much stock in IQ scores have fun with it.Miller wrote:
I'd put them at the top, almost as close to the top as Reagan was.jonsimon wrote:
Yeah, I'd place them both in the same IQ bracket, namely, the bottom.Miller wrote:
Nice description, I could picture him being Sean Hannity debating with these guys.
My vote goes to Bubbalo.
I dunno whether to be flattered, disgruntled, or merely to raise an inquisitive eyebrow.Spark wrote:
unnamednewbie, ATG, usmarine, rawls and miller are not neo-cons. They are your moderate conservatives (centre-right), that's all.)
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-10-11 16:32:46)
The later...
I would go with being a little confused and shocked, then running around with a sledge hammer.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
My vote goes to Bubbalo.I dunno whether to be flattered, disgruntled, or merely to raise an inquisitive eyebrow.Spark wrote:
unnamednewbie, ATG, usmarine, rawls and miller are not neo-cons. They are your moderate conservatives (centre-right), that's all.)
your moderate conservatives leader vote start....now.
I nominate kr@cker be on ballot.
I nominate kr@cker be on ballot.
Last edited by ATG (2006-10-11 16:38:15)
I seem to have squeeked right out of that neo con lineup!!!
Rightly so I might add! I am just vehemently PRO American thats all. . .
Rightly so I might add! I am just vehemently PRO American thats all. . .
most extreme neo-con???.........I vote lowing,......I also eat little kids that wonder into my yard looking for their baseball.
How do I get my name in the vote?
Malloy must go
Lowing I make you look like a hippy. I would eat the baseball and make the kid cry before I ate him.lowing wrote:
most extreme neo-con???.........I vote lowing,......I also eat little kids that wonder into my yard looking for their baseball.
Malloy must go
Just in case they are terrorists.lowing wrote:
most extreme neo-con???.........I vote lowing,......I also eat little kids that wonder into my yard looking for their baseball.
fix'tsergeriver wrote:
Just in case they are terrorist babies.