Haven't seen a blatant, undeniable Bush bashing thread lately so I thought I'd make one and make it debatable by soliciting comments from both sides of this topic:
Is Bush a Coward or is he Courageous?
And finally, I'll start by defining his cowardice with this latest find on thinkprogress.org..
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/10/bus … ate-korea/
BUSH: We will not tolerate [nuclear] weapons in North Korea. We will not give into blackmail. We will not settle for anything less than the complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of North Korea’s [nuclear] weapons program. [5/23/03]
BUSH: The transfer of [nuclear] weapons or material by North Korea to states or non-state entities would be considered a grave threat to the United States, and we would hold North Korea fully accountable of the consequences of such action. [10/9/06]
I don't know, but not tolerating anything sure doesn't sound like what he's said yesterday about N. Korea and the prospect of them transferring "nookuler" weapons or materials to other places.
Cowardice or Courageous?
Is Bush a Coward or is he Courageous?
And finally, I'll start by defining his cowardice with this latest find on thinkprogress.org..
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/10/bus … ate-korea/
BUSH: We will not tolerate [nuclear] weapons in North Korea. We will not give into blackmail. We will not settle for anything less than the complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of North Korea’s [nuclear] weapons program. [5/23/03]
BUSH: The transfer of [nuclear] weapons or material by North Korea to states or non-state entities would be considered a grave threat to the United States, and we would hold North Korea fully accountable of the consequences of such action. [10/9/06]
I don't know, but not tolerating anything sure doesn't sound like what he's said yesterday about N. Korea and the prospect of them transferring "nookuler" weapons or materials to other places.
Cowardice or Courageous?
Last edited by IRONCHEF (2006-10-10 16:23:35)
