DuhDesertFox423 wrote:
You are talking about reproduction, not sex.usmarine2005 wrote:
Right. How did you get here? Why does the animal kingdom do it? Oh ya....to continue the cycle of life.DesertFox423 wrote:
Also marine, sex is NOT essential to lifeThere are some who wouldn't consider marrying a non-American & non-Christian denomination.topal63 wrote:
I said I WOULD NOT MARRY AN AMERICAN OR A CHRISTIAN, I have many in reasons, and some were related - some not.
Poll
Would you consider/have engaged in premarital sex?
| Yes, already been there and done that. | 66% | 66% - 209 | ||||
| Yes, I will if I get the chance to/grow up. | 18% | 18% - 59 | ||||
| Undecided, need to learn more. | 5% | 5% - 17 | ||||
| Definitely not, it's wrong. | 9% | 9% - 29 | ||||
| Total: 314 | ||||||
Forgive me. Maybe you could show me where you said you'd like a woman with brains, a soft touch, a good sense of humor, someone who can satisfy you intellectually as well as sexually? Being non-american or non-christian as criteria just shows how intolerant and ignorant you are and is hardly criteria for deciding on the right woman to spend your life with. Seriously, did you even watch Shallow Hal? Did you not learn anything from that wonderful movie?topal63 wrote:
As if that was the only thing said - your being selective; and your assumption of "shallowness" like I said belongs to you.
I said I WOULD NOT MARRY AN AMERICAN OR A CHRISTIAN, I have many in reasons, and some were related - some not.
Last edited by IRONCHEF (2006-10-10 15:04:06)
I didn't watch Shallow Hal since Jack Black farking sucks.
I don't have to... show you anything - nor will I try.IRONCHEF wrote:
Forgive me. Maybe you could show me where you said you'd like a woman with brains, a soft touch, a good sense of humor, someone who can satisfy you intellectually as well as sexually? Being non-american or non-christian as criteria just shows how intolerant and ignorant you are and is hardly criteria for deciding on the right woman to spend your life with. Seriously, did you even watch Shallow Hall? Did you not learn anything from that wonderful movie?topal63 wrote:
As if that was the only thing said - your being selective; and your assumption of "shallowness" like I said belongs to you.
I said I WOULD NOT MARRY AN AMERICAN OR A CHRISTIAN, I have many reasons, and some were related - some not.
Your judgments assumptions still wholly belong to you; they merely exist in your-mind.
Last edited by topal63 (2006-10-10 15:05:25)
Jack Black actually really impressed me in King Kong. Too bad King Kong was among one of the worst movies I've ever seen in my life.DesertFox423 wrote:
I didn't watch Shallow Hal since Jack Black farking sucks.
Oooh...you're sooo lucky i can't give you negative karma for that blasphemy! Jack Black is the best damned actor ever made! But seriously, that dude is probably one of the funniest and original actors there is!
Lovely! Then how bout you just STFU and stop tring to argue with me then? You and pollux are (if not the same person) just in love with me and my beliefs and you show it every time you open your...keyboard around my posts.topal63 wrote:
I don't have to... show you anything - nor will I try.IRONCHEF wrote:
Forgive me. Maybe you could show me where you said you'd like a woman with brains, a soft touch, a good sense of humor, someone who can satisfy you intellectually as well as sexually? Being non-american or non-christian as criteria just shows how intolerant and ignorant you are and is hardly criteria for deciding on the right woman to spend your life with. Seriously, did you even watch Shallow Hall? Did you not learn anything from that wonderful movie?topal63 wrote:
As if that was the only thing said - your being selective; and your assumption of "shallowness" like I said belongs to you.
I said I WOULD NOT MARRY AN AMERICAN OR A CHRISTIAN, I have many reasons, and some were related - some not.
Your judgments assumptions still wholly belong to you; they merely exist in your-mind.
Of course I am f.pollux...IRONCHEF wrote:
Lovely! Then how bout you just STFU and stop tring to argue with me then? You and pollux are (if not the same person) just in love with me and my beliefs and you show it every time you open your...keyboard around my posts.topal63 wrote:
I don't have to... show you anything - nor will I try.IRONCHEF wrote:
Forgive me. Maybe you could show me where you said you'd like a woman with brains, a soft touch, a good sense of humor, someone who can satisfy you intellectually as well as sexually? Being non-american or non-christian as criteria just shows how intolerant and ignorant you are and is hardly criteria for deciding on the right woman to spend your life with. Seriously, did you even watch Shallow Hall? Did you not learn anything from that wonderful movie?
Your judgments assumptions still wholly belong to you; they merely exist in your-mind.
Your accurate assumptive reasoning skills are right on target.
Last edited by topal63 (2006-10-10 15:10:06)
I hope the only pre-marital I have is with someone I am truly passionate for and care about. One-night-stand=just for increasing your penis size when talking with your RL friends and your e-penis online. If you're drunk while doing it, you also risk getting an STD... or forgetting to put protection on. Sex, consensual sex, with someone you care about and who cares about you IMO is fine. Pre-marital or not, if you are doing it because of the love and not because you can, then I see no problem with that. I don't see a problem with one-nighters either, but I just don't see the point asides from what I said earlier.
Aaah, this post not only shows your maturity but also how many times you've been laid.TheCanadianTerrorist wrote:
Fuck religion, I'll tap whatever I want, when I want. Damn Christians/Muslims and your stupid laws.
You must be at least 40 and slept with just as many women.
/endSarcasm
Nice pic - three! You got to be busy. I have a two and three year old.IRONCHEF wrote:
haha, cool!
I'm not sure if i confused you or helped you, but ok. So you got little puglets that will become teenagers some day? And you'll be teaching them abstinence? Good for you.
My little babies.
The clarification helped - however, if you ask my wife I don't think she'd think sex with me is a "gift".
At first I thought something else which is why I asked. Just cuz I didn't strongly believe you doesn't mean I don't want it for the kiddos. Having kids (especially a girl) changes everything.
Topical...
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Mov … index.html
Would you say no to Scarlett Johansson?
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Mov … index.html
Would you say no to Scarlett Johansson?
I would.CameronPoe wrote:
Topical...
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Mov … index.html
Would you say no to Scarlett Johansson?
I don't get it. People get married because they love each other right? So, if sex is an expression of love, why do you need a piece of paper saying "married" to validate your sexual relationship? What if I live with someone for 2 years, then on January 1st of the third year I have sex with her. People will say that is wrong because we are not married. Then my friend, gets married on that same day, and because he has a piece of paper, he can bang her brains out. That makes no sense to me and never will.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-10-10 16:24:24)
That's the marriage certificate. The religious ceremony is what is important. Sex is also, most definately, not an expression of love. Think of how many you would have sex with but aren't in love with.
Last edited by DesertFox423 (2006-10-10 16:34:37)
Who said the piece of paper validates anything?
For your other questions:
1) going through actual marriage, be it in a clerk's office or in st peter's bisilica (or whatever fancy place to git hitched people use), is a manifestation of true commitment. No amount of promising and well wishing makes you so committed as doing that civil/religious ordinance.
2) and when you are thus committed, till death do you part, you then have this privilege of giving all of yourself to your bride. but as i said previously, if you're doing the whole abstinence thing before marriage, you should probably know what you are doing it for and why. If you understand what a great gift that would be, then you won't mind waiting..because isn't she worth it?
Anywho, not sure if that clears it up for you or not.
also... sex is an expression (it's also exercise, it's therapy, it's food, it's stress relief. . ) it can 'also' be an expression of love. remember there's many different interpretations of what love is. in my book, it is an expression that is appropriate within marriage. but that's just me. call me a crazy religious zealot!
For your other questions:
1) going through actual marriage, be it in a clerk's office or in st peter's bisilica (or whatever fancy place to git hitched people use), is a manifestation of true commitment. No amount of promising and well wishing makes you so committed as doing that civil/religious ordinance.
2) and when you are thus committed, till death do you part, you then have this privilege of giving all of yourself to your bride. but as i said previously, if you're doing the whole abstinence thing before marriage, you should probably know what you are doing it for and why. If you understand what a great gift that would be, then you won't mind waiting..because isn't she worth it?
Anywho, not sure if that clears it up for you or not.
also... sex is an expression (it's also exercise, it's therapy, it's food, it's stress relief. . ) it can 'also' be an expression of love. remember there's many different interpretations of what love is. in my book, it is an expression that is appropriate within marriage. but that's just me. call me a crazy religious zealot!
Well, I think religion is BS, and sex should be up to the participants.
Well, 95% of the world's historical population would disagree with that assessment, and sex IS up to the participants.
By up to, I meant no outside interference in the thought process. And I spent 12 years in Catholic school, so I am not talking out of my ass completely when I say religion is BS.IRONCHEF wrote:
Well, 95% of the world's historical population would disagree with that assessment, and sex IS up to the participants.
Ah, but you don't have to marry to love someone. As the man said, he's asking about sex outside of marrige, not one night stands. =PArkhon wrote:
I honestly don't sleep with women I do not love. I just can't. But then thats me and all my mates laugh at me for it. As I said each to their own. It's your life live it how you want to.
hehe, i didnt say you were talking out of your ass. however, your qualification of having 12 years of catholic school qualifies you to accurately say catholicism is BS..to the degree you were indoctrinated in said religious studies, not all religion. did you go to seminary?
Hell no. Grade school and High School.IRONCHEF wrote:
did you go to seminary?
LOL, and the fact that a good many of them are probably not even teenagers anymore...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
wow, im shocked how stupid I find this question and the fact that people would even consider asking it...my fault i guess.
im even dumber for just realizing that most the people that post here have never even touched a girl
Someday, most of you will come to the realization and conclusion that you will never get to have sex. Ever.
That's the day you will stop caring about your stats.
That's the day you will stop caring about your stats.
Um. No.jsnipy wrote:
You know, laws (govt or religious) about sex were made to prevent violence and rampant fatherless children ... not just to cockblock.
In fact, most religious rules I dare say, have increased violence.
Pick a religious rule about sex, and I'll shoot it down in flames with logic.