I never asked that topic to be closed, he offered and I agreed.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
LO fucking L real great selective quoting. just proving how weak the argument was.
Your arguments are calling a person yahoo and twit?
I never asked that topic to be closed, he offered and I agreed.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
LO fucking L real great selective quoting. just proving how weak the argument was.
Options 1 & 2 seem fine to me.Kung Jew wrote:
This topic has the potential....
1. To be a good debate topic.
2. To be constructive and raise awareness of today's political climate in our younger members.
3. Be closed promptly because Gunslinger and Sergeriver are bickering like two old ladies.
cut the shit guys, only warning. Set the personal stuff into PM's and stay on topic, or take a vacation.
KJ
Are you making a reference to North Korea, or to the United States?Arkhon wrote:
Because last time I checked France wasn't similar to a military dictatorship and they didn't have a man who thought he was god running the place.sergeriver wrote:
But why is a big deal if NK does it and it's not a problem at all when France did it?
No by Good ol dumb BushColfax wrote:
Oh you mean by good ole Bill Clintonalpinestar wrote:
All sponsored by USA, Irony ?
are you kidding bub? google or wiki him and it won't take long, if only i were on my work computer to post that pic of him in an elvis sequin suitBubbalo wrote:
You base this assesment on?PitViper401 wrote:
Kim Jong-Il (or however you spell it) is not quite ... shall we say stable?
it's government induced famine/poverty, what stable person would do that?Bubbalo wrote:
So that makes him unstable? Is George Bush unstable? There are people in the US in need of food, clothing, homes. Is Australia unstable? Our hospital waiting times are appalling. Are member of organised crime unstable?
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-10-10 19:42:36)