BF2S Forums Is Al Qaeda trying to influence the U.S. Elections?

of course they are, basically every tax paying american is funding there own destruction...funny shit

Just when you thought the left had the monopoly on crazy conspiracy theories.

lowing wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

Just when you thought the left had the monopoly on crazy conspiracy theories.

lol since when is Clinton's miltary response to terrorism ,or lack of it, a theory??

That's not the question. The question is, not my own I might add, "Is Al Qaeda trying to influence the U.S. Elections?"

I don't think they are a much as the South American drug cartels.
Post coming soon about that.

Spearhead wrote:

lowing wrote:

Hell yes they are............They desperately need a liberal back in office so nobody will fight back.

lol.................. vote republican or get killed... sounds like Nazi tactics if you ask me...

And of course, you act like they just popped up only after we invaded.

no, that is my point. they have been attacking us for quite some time now.

My approach is better than your approach ......................vote democrat and HOPE you don't get killed after meeting all of their demands.

lowing wrote:

Hell yes they are............They desperately need a liberal back in office so nobody will fight back.

You got to be kidding me. Since the Afghanistan and Iraq wars have been started, Al Qaeda  has tripled their strength. Osama has to love Bush Policy's. Before 9/11 he had to go to America to blow Americans up. No he can just go out of his cave to find one.

lowing wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

lowing wrote:

Hell yes they are............They desperately need a liberal back in office so nobody will fight back.

lol.................. vote republican or get killed... sounds like Nazi tactics if you ask me...

And of course, you act like they just popped up only after we invaded.

no, that is my point. they have been attacking us for quite some time now.

My approach is better than your approach ......................vote democrat and HOPE you don't get killed after meeting all of their demands.

lowing says this but forgot that the right has given up looking for bin laden
EXACTLY who's demands, then, are you talking about?  Who are 'they'?

Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-10-09 02:58:01)

Spumantiii wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

lol.................. vote republican or get killed... sounds like Nazi tactics if you ask me...

And of course, you act like they just popped up only after we invaded.

no, that is my point. they have been attacking us for quite some time now.

My approach is better than your approach ......................vote democrat and HOPE you don't get killed after meeting all of their demands.

lowing says this but forgot that the right has given up looking for bin laden
EXACTLY who's demands, then, are you talking about?  Who are 'they'?

I gave up rights??!!...by all means do tell which ones please.

did you know that the USA funds al Quaeda through subcontractors?

Labour subcontractors under KBR get their workers from small villiages fuelling the influx of terror ito Iraq
each level of the worker contract pyramid is not responsible for what the level under it does.  Not only are workers being killed for working for the US by terrorists, the sub sub contractors are frequently terrorist aiding organizations.

Nothing is being done on the Pakistani border, where the supposed threat originates, this means there is a reason for that

Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-10-09 03:08:06)

lowing wrote:

yeah like the big campigns we were enganged in in Afghanistan and Iraq in '93, 98,2000, and 2001. Coffee is ready time to wake up.

Yes, actually, exactly like those campaigns.  You do know Al Qaeda was founded to combat the Russian invasion of Afghanistan?

Bubbalo wrote:

lowing wrote:

yeah like the big campigns we were enganged in in Afghanistan and Iraq in '93, 98,2000, and 2001. Coffee is ready time to wake up.

Yes, actually, exactly like those campaigns.  You do know Al Qaeda was founded to combat the Russian invasion of Afghanistan?

In the 80's bubbalo, in the 80's......NOT in 93 98, etc.....It was also perfectly understandable as to why.

lowing wrote:

In the 80's bubbalo, in the 80's......NOT in 93 98, etc.....It was also perfectly understandable as to why.

Oh, yes, because ten or twenty years completely changes cultural wishes.  Whether or not it was understandable ignores the fact that unless there is a percieved threat from Western influence, they lack a ready supply of recruits.

dubbs wrote:

Get your facts straight.  Al Qaeda was not funded, the Talbian and Freedom Fighters were funded by the US. Just like the US funded Saddam in Iraq in the 70's.

What does any of that have to do with anything I said (regardless of whether it's true).