So where do you get your information from?SoC./Omega wrote:
Thank you! Clinton was an idiot, you Dems think he was so great when he was shit. The definition of a democrat = brainwashed by the media weirdo. What ever happened to the old dems, the Kennedy or Rosevelt dems?!M1-Lightning wrote:
Because the Dems have no political platform to stand on so they need all the help they can get in bashing the other side.ATG wrote:
Why is it that only former democrat presidents go around talking shit?
Whatever happened to having some class?
I don't hear Bush 1 talking shit about Clinton, or Ford talking shit about Carter, yet there these clowns are, bashing Republicans every time there is a camera around.
Pathetic
tisk tisk, ill go ahead here and list all the liberal news channels : CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, and the only one that gets their facts right is Fox News. The biggest liberal on TV is Chris Matthews of MSNBC. Face it, the media is run by stupid liberals who just want to bash the other party.... even on 9/11 one of the worst days ever dems still wanted to bash instead of get together with all other americans and make sure that who ever did this would be punished. When we declared war on Al Queda dems agreed to go to war, now they say that they didnt vote for war and we should pull out now... they never use their brains.
That's your source?SoC./Omega wrote:
If you were American you would know he was a hell of alot better than Clinton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_clinton
I just went to wiki quick, got a problem? Its not the best source but I'm not gonna spend all day on you, today is my day off.
Is Al-Qaeda a country? Or it was just an excuse to get into Afghanistan and Iraq? Because I don't think Al-Qaeda has a homeland. Ideologies have no borders.SoC./Omega wrote:
tisk tisk, ill go ahead here and list all the liberal news channels : CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, and the only one that gets their facts right is Fox News. The biggest liberal on TV is Chris Matthews of MSNBC. Face it, the media is run by stupid liberals who just want to bash the other party.... even on 9/11 one of the worst days ever dems still wanted to bash instead of get together with all other americans and make sure that who ever did this would be punished. When we declared war on Al Queda dems agreed to go to war, now they say that they didnt vote for war and we should pull out now... they never use their brains.
No Al Qaeda was housed and protected by the Taliban.
Yeah........I think this guy proves your point perfectly M1-Lightning and ATG..........LMAOSoC./Omega wrote:
Thank you! Clinton was an idiot, you Dems think he was so great when he was shit. The definition of a democrat = brainwashed by the media weirdo. What ever happened to the old dems, the Kennedy or Rosevelt dems?!M1-Lightning wrote:
Because the Dems have no political platform to stand on so they need all the help they can get in bashing the other side.ATG wrote:
Why is it that only former democrat presidents go around talking shit?
Whatever happened to having some class?
I don't hear Bush 1 talking shit about Clinton, or Ford talking shit about Carter, yet there these clowns are, bashing Republicans every time there is a camera around.
Pathetic
Jusster
They removed the Taliban, and Al-Qaeda is still there.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
No Al Qaeda was housed and protected by the Taliban.
Oh is it the same as before the Taliban was in power? Or do they hide in caves now..
Theres plenty of logic in scrutinizing Iraq but Afghanistan was a no brainer.
Theres plenty of logic in scrutinizing Iraq but Afghanistan was a no brainer.
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan is their home land, and we were right in killing those basterds. Anyone who protects a terroist is one. Terroists are mean people who need to be dead, they cut peoples heads off on TV to show how strong they are..... tell me you love to see that. They kidnap little boys and girls and torture them.
This is just a fact that I got off the news about a month ago : Americans left the Abu Graib prison to the Iraqi military, not entirely but they left torture to them and stuff. Interesting thing is, the terroists there want the Americans back in charge because the Iraqis were beating them so hard. This is a note that we don't torture near as hard as other countries. And I say to the Iraqi military go on tortureing the terroists who killed their families, go on because terroists deserve all the pain they can get from their victims.
This is just a fact that I got off the news about a month ago : Americans left the Abu Graib prison to the Iraqi military, not entirely but they left torture to them and stuff. Interesting thing is, the terroists there want the Americans back in charge because the Iraqis were beating them so hard. This is a note that we don't torture near as hard as other countries. And I say to the Iraqi military go on tortureing the terroists who killed their families, go on because terroists deserve all the pain they can get from their victims.
Don't forget the liberal BBC and world news channels, and the internet... Damn Liberals got there hands on the internet too.SoC./Omega wrote:
tisk tisk, ill go ahead here and list all the liberal news channels : CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, and the only one that gets their facts right is Fox News. The biggest liberal on TV is Chris Matthews of MSNBC. Face it, the media is run by stupid liberals who just want to bash the other party.... even on 9/11 one of the worst days ever dems still wanted to bash instead of get together with all other americans and make sure that who ever did this would be punished. When we declared war on Al Queda dems agreed to go to war, now they say that they didnt vote for war and we should pull out now... they never use their brains.
Thank god we have a bible of news like FOX or else we woulnd't know what to do.. I say bible because even though some of there viewpoints make no sense at all, it's still acurate...
Doesn't matter where they hide, they will continue with their agenda in a cave or in a palace. Ideologies are in men brains not in a certain place.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
Oh is it the same as before the Taliban was in power? Or do they hide in caves now..
Theres plenty of logic in scrutinizing Iraq but Afghanistan was a no brainer.
What link has Iraq with Al-Qaeda?SoC./Omega wrote:
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan is their home land, and we were right in killing those basterds. Anyone who protects a terroist is one. Terroists are mean people who need to be dead, they cut peoples heads off on TV to show how strong they are..... tell me you love to see that. They kidnap little boys and girls and torture them.
This is just a fact that I got off the news about a month ago : Americans left the Abu Graib prison to the Iraqi military, not entirely but they left torture to them and stuff. Interesting thing is, the terroists there want the Americans back in charge because the Iraqis were beating them so hard. This is a note that we don't torture near as hard as other countries. And I say to the Iraqi military go on tortureing the terroists who killed their families, go on because terroists deserve all the pain they can get from their victims.
I don't need to talk to you anymore, you obviously don't know what you're talking about. The link is..... AL QAEDA LIVES IN IRAQ! GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD! that is my last comment.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5328592.stmSoC./Omega wrote:
I don't need to talk to you anymore, you obviously don't know what you're talking about. The link is..... AL QAEDA LIVES IN IRAQ! GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD! that is my last comment.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar … Jun17.html (here he still admits there was a link)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/09/ … 9intel.php
Enjoy Fox News m8.
Iraq is not Al Qaeda's "home land" ...they do not live in Iraq. Its common public knowledge theres no connection between Al Qaeda and Sadaam. After OIF they visit there now but they are not the insurgency.SoC./Omefga wrote:
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan is their home land
AL QAEDA LIVES IN IRAQ! GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD! that is my last comment.
Yes but even though the president said "Iraq had nothing to do with Al Queda" it wasn't reported by Fox so it doesn't exist...
The BBC link I have one last thing to say about. Yes we know he had no link, but he was a warlord who was killing his people for a long time, it just happened to be we decided that it would be a good chance to get Saddam while we were over in Iraq. Happy?
You said AL QAEDA LIVES IN IRAQ. GET IT IN YOUR HEAD.SoC./Omega wrote:
The BBC link I have one last thing to say about. Yes we know he had no link, but he was a warlord who was killing his people for a long time, it just happened to be we decided that it would be a good chance to get Saddam while we were over in Iraq. Happy?
This is quoted from that article of BBC from a high CIA member...
"Saddam Hussein was distrustful of al-Qaeda and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al-Qaeda to provide material or operational support,"
no comment
Right So destablize a country that was relatively peacefull for 10 years and was a great threat to Iran. Cause more deaths in the region then Saddam caused during his attack on the Kurds, because we had a good chance to?
F it with logic like that I think we should invade Canada because they Say EH after ever sentance and they are a threat to the English langue?
F it with logic like that I think we should invade Canada because they Say EH after ever sentance and they are a threat to the English langue?
Yeah. Fox News is pretty gay. . .kinda like sergeriver and his fuzzy logic. Then again. . .the only reason Fox News is like it is is because all the other media outlets are so liberal. Fox knows that it'll get huge ratings by being any sort of conservative at all while places like MSNBC struggle to keep their doors open because they put out the same product as all the other media groups. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are two of the wackiest liberals I've ever seen and they take up huge chunks of TV time throughout the day.
Sad part is. . .even most Democrats are moderate. Just like most Republicans are moderate. We end up having to watch, see, elect, deal with all the crazies on either side like our good friend sergeriver and others on here. Seriously. . .I'm voting for Kinky Friedman for Texas governor and if some Libertarian would get on the Presidential ballot he'd have my vote easily.
Sad part is. . .even most Democrats are moderate. Just like most Republicans are moderate. We end up having to watch, see, elect, deal with all the crazies on either side like our good friend sergeriver and others on here. Seriously. . .I'm voting for Kinky Friedman for Texas governor and if some Libertarian would get on the Presidential ballot he'd have my vote easily.
I agree with you for the first time I belive Aenima_Eyes, we need a regime change. Neither the democratic or the Republican Ideals really benefit or make sense anymore. It' really beyond logic that these two similar political parties are still the only one's that legitimatly have a chance of being elected..
Well, the fall of the Soviet Union (which could be a bad thing depending on you perspective). Of course this occured during George Bush Sr.'s presidency, but no one argues the fact that it was the actions and policies enacted during the Reagan presidency which precipitated this.sergeriver wrote:
Could you back that with some facts? And we must assume for your answer that GWB is doing bad.SoC./Omega wrote:
Ronald Reagan for 500 please?sergeriver wrote:
Name the last Republican president who did well. Give proof. I must have been brainwashed by the media coz I think Clinton was a great president and he is doing a great job right now. Yeah, I'm not American, if you want to bash me about that I couldn't care less.
Well, it looks like that show is more Clinton's then Wallace's.