Sorry, I haven't seen f prime in like 15 years...a little rusty, so I had to check...
So um, can anyone explain what this poem means to them? Like, what you think it means?
If you say in a poem "grass is green,"
They all ask, "What did you mean?"
"That nature is ignorant," you reply,
"And on a deeper level - youth must die."
If you say in a poem "grass is red",
They understand what you have said.
People expect you to say things in poems that are either abstract or profound or just different that everyday life. If you say something ordinary, they believe you're trying to say something more.
ok math:
i should be able to do this but i cant think straight right now:
i should be able to do this but i cant think straight right now:
please help!!Randy is building a fence at the side of his warehouse. He has 120 m of fencing and plans to use the side of the warehouse as one side of the rectangular fenced area. What are the dimensions of the maximum area Randy can enclose.
heres the formula:
A=(120-21)(y)
A bit of AS Level maths you say? Ok here you go.
The whole question reads:
"a) Given that
(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = A + Bx^2 + Cx^4,
Find the value of the constants A, B and C."
Ive done that, A = 64, B = 160, C = 20
But then it says
"b) Using the substitution y = x^2 and your answer to part a) solve
(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 349."
I dont understand whtat the by substitutioin bit means...
I.E. (2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 64 + 160 x^2 + 20x^4 (from a)
So does it want you to solve 64 + 160y + 20(x^2)(y)
I tried this and got ~ +- 30, which is way off.
*Confused*
PS the answer is given in the back of the book if you want.
Karma for the working solution!
The whole question reads:
"a) Given that
(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = A + Bx^2 + Cx^4,
Find the value of the constants A, B and C."
Ive done that, A = 64, B = 160, C = 20
But then it says
"b) Using the substitution y = x^2 and your answer to part a) solve
(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 349."
I dont understand whtat the by substitutioin bit means...
I.E. (2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 64 + 160 x^2 + 20x^4 (from a)
So does it want you to solve 64 + 160y + 20(x^2)(y)
I tried this and got ~ +- 30, which is way off.
*Confused*
PS the answer is given in the back of the book if you want.
Karma for the working solution!
Last edited by =Karma-Kills= (2006-12-21 10:49:59)
whats the answer? so if i got it right i will post my working=Karma-Kills= wrote:
A bit of AS Level maths you say? Ok here you go.
The whole question reads:
"a) Given that
(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = A + Bx^2 + Cx^4,
Find the value of the constants A, B and C."
Ive done that, A = 64, B = 160, C = 20
But then it says
"b) Using the substitution y = x^2 and your answer to part a) solve
(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 349."
I dont understand whtat the by substitutioin bit means...
I.E. (2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 64 + 160 x^2 + 20x^4 (from a)
So does it want you to solve 64 + 160y + 20(x^2)(y)
I tried this and got ~ +- 30, which is way off.
*Confused*
PS the answer is given in the back of the book if you want.
Karma for the working solution!
Ok the answer is
+/- Square root of 3/2
Ya get it?
Thanks for trying anyways
+/- Square root of 3/2
Ya get it?
Thanks for trying anyways
cool, I got that xD=Karma-Kills= wrote:
Ok the answer is
+/- Square root of 3/2
Ya get it?
Thanks for trying anyways
20x^4+160x^2-285=0 I just took -285 from both sides.
x^2(20x^2+160)-285=0 Factorise
Now u replace each x^2 with Y
Y(20Y+160)-285
20Y^2 + 160Y -285 Now u have a quadratic equation involving Y
so Y= 1.5 or -9.5 ( I used my calculator to find out this)
Subsitute 1.5 back into one of the equations either 20x^3+160x^2=285 or y=x^2
I used the y=x^2 cuz its easier
1.5=x^2
so X= +- square root of 1.5
U can't use the -9.5 cuz u can't square root -ve number
Last edited by rabee2789b (2006-12-22 07:25:09)
Thats not technically true, the square root of a negative number is a complex numberrabee2789b wrote:
U can't use the -9.5 cuz u can't square root -ve number
i.e. (-1)^0.5 = i (or j; depending on where you are taught and the convention you use)
These complex numbers are used when converting equations from the time domain into dimensionless equations, can be very useful
Good work on solving the problem above though
Yes, but hes doing AS Maths, hes not meant to know how to square root -ve number. If hes doing Further maths I would agree abut wut ur saying ^^Mong0ose wrote:
Thats not technically true, the square root of a negative number is a complex numberrabee2789b wrote:
U can't use the -9.5 cuz u can't square root -ve number
i.e. (-1)^0.5 = i (or j; depending on where you are taught and the convention you use)
These complex numbers are used when converting equations from the time domain into dimensionless equations, can be very useful
Good work on solving the problem above though
Last edited by rabee2789b (2006-12-22 07:44:54)
You could solve this using vestors and what-not.Nessie09 wrote:
No idea, but since we are doing homework: (yes this was in the math topic aswell)
http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/9/26613451733.jpg(click to enlarge)
prove that ED is parallel to CF
been working on this all day, but can't figure it out
CF=CG+GF
ED=EG+GD
Now, CG is parallel to GD and EG is parallel to GF. As the two vectors CF and ED can be written as their component vectors, all of which are parallel, then CF and ED must be parallel.
rabee2789b - thanks.
Yeh i have heard about real and fake numbers and all that... but havent really been taught it (i did Further Maths for GCSE, but only doing normal A level now).
Anyways thanks a lot, i see how you got it and it all makes sense.
All i needed to do was replace the remaining x^2 with a y... *slaps forehead*
Easy when you know how eh?!
Yeh i have heard about real and fake numbers and all that... but havent really been taught it (i did Further Maths for GCSE, but only doing normal A level now).
Anyways thanks a lot, i see how you got it and it all makes sense.
All i needed to do was replace the remaining x^2 with a y... *slaps forehead*
Easy when you know how eh?!
Last edited by =Karma-Kills= (2006-12-22 10:57:26)
np welcome=Karma-Kills= wrote:
rabee2789b - thanks.
Yeh i have heard about real and fake numbers and all that... but havent really been taught it (i did Further Maths for GCSE, but only doing normal A level now).
Anyways thanks a lot, i see how you got it and it all makes sense.
All i needed to do was replace the remaining x^2 with a y... *slaps forehead*
Easy when you know how eh?!
like ur sig btw
Got some more!
*Feels dumb for posting so much in this thread*
Logs now...
"Calculate the value of y for which 2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2"
That reads, "2 log to the base 3 of y - log to the base 3 of (y + 4) = 2 if that helps....
This is my attempt:
2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2
log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1
Then the tricky bit, im pretty sure you have to use the Laws of Logs to combine the 2 minuses into 1 divide (e.g something like "log (to the base 3) y / 2(Y+4) )
But im not sure how to excatly.
I can tell you the answer is 12...
Any help (and solutions!) gets +1!
Oh and please clarify what would y / (y + 4) equal? Something like 4y^-1?
Thanks guys
*Feels dumb for posting so much in this thread*
Logs now...
"Calculate the value of y for which 2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2"
That reads, "2 log to the base 3 of y - log to the base 3 of (y + 4) = 2 if that helps....
This is my attempt:
2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2
log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1
Then the tricky bit, im pretty sure you have to use the Laws of Logs to combine the 2 minuses into 1 divide (e.g something like "log (to the base 3) y / 2(Y+4) )
But im not sure how to excatly.
I can tell you the answer is 12...
Any help (and solutions!) gets +1!
Oh and please clarify what would y / (y + 4) equal? Something like 4y^-1?
Thanks guys
My homework:
Identify a single absolute truth that is eternally and universally true.
My best guess is 'All absolutes are false'... which itself is an absolute which means it is false, which rectifies the statement due to the fact it is an absolute. I think.
Rawrgh.
Identify a single absolute truth that is eternally and universally true.
My best guess is 'All absolutes are false'... which itself is an absolute which means it is false, which rectifies the statement due to the fact it is an absolute. I think.
Rawrgh.
say "{your teacher's name} is gay" and watch your class love you.
2 + 2 = ?
wtf mang this question is boterin me fr liek n hour lolol can some1 plz help me
teh teachr is so gey
wtf mang this question is boterin me fr liek n hour lolol can some1 plz help me
teh teachr is so gey
Wehay.
I answered my own question.
Any one who wonders, the key is
log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1
Take the half back up as a power and then use Law of Logs to divide... easy peasy
I answered my own question.
Any one who wonders, the key is
log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1
Take the half back up as a power and then use Law of Logs to divide... easy peasy
2log3y-log3(y+4)=2=Karma-Kills= wrote:
Got some more!
*Feels dumb for posting so much in this thread*
Logs now...
"Calculate the value of y for which 2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2"
That reads, "2 log to the base 3 of y - log to the base 3 of (y + 4) = 2 if that helps....
This is my attempt:
2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2
log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1
Then the tricky bit, im pretty sure you have to use the Laws of Logs to combine the 2 minuses into 1 divide (e.g something like "log (to the base 3) y / 2(Y+4) )
But im not sure how to excatly.
I can tell you the answer is 12...
Any help (and solutions!) gets +1!
Oh and please clarify what would y / (y + 4) equal? Something like 4y^-1?
Thanks guys
log3 Y^2 - log3 (y+4)=2
log3 (y^2)/(y+4)=2
3^2= (y^2)/(y+4)
9= (y^2)/(y+4)
y^2-9y-36
(y-12)(y+3)
so Y=12 or Y=-3
hence u can't log -ve number, so the answer is 12!
Last edited by rabee2789b (2007-01-20 10:07:11)
4Archer wrote:
2 + 2 = ?
wtf mang this question is boterin me fr liek n hour lolol can some1 plz help me
teh teachr is so gey
Hey everyone i really need my question answered in the next half hour or so and i would really appreciate any help
My question
Prove the identity (Trigonometric identities)
1 / (1-cosx) + 1 / (1+cosx) = 2 / (sin^2x)
I really need the help badly!!
My question
Prove the identity (Trigonometric identities)
1 / (1-cosx) + 1 / (1+cosx) = 2 / (sin^2x)
I really need the help badly!!
bump ^^^^^
err....
I hope to god im not doing that level of maths any time soon....
I hope to god im not doing that level of maths any time soon....
Man I remember doing trigonometric identities/proofs two years ago... they were really annoying, proofs and identities are possibly the hardest thing you'll ever do in math.
Can't help you though, I forgot all my identities. Give me a list of the identities and I can try.
Can't help you though, I forgot all my identities. Give me a list of the identities and I can try.
Yeah, I did proofs and identities over four years ago...I can't remember anything about them.
If it's something to do with English, I can probably help you...math...not so much. I haven't taken a math class in three years.
If it's something to do with English, I can probably help you...math...not so much. I haven't taken a math class in three years.