Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6787|Texas - Bigger than France
Sorry, I haven't seen f prime in like 15 years...a little rusty, so I had to check...
Prodie
Moderator Emeritus
+270|7019|Nova Scotia, Canada

So um, can anyone explain what this poem means to them? Like, what you think it means?
If you say in a poem "grass is green,"
They all ask, "What did you mean?"

"That nature is ignorant," you reply,
"And on a deeper level - youth must die."

If you say in a poem "grass is red",
They understand what you have said.
chittydog
less busy
+586|7080|Kubra, Damn it!

People expect you to say things in poems that are either abstract or profound or just different that everyday life. If you say something ordinary, they believe you're trying to say something more.
CanadianLoser
Meow :3 :3
+1,148|6752
ok math:

i should be able to do this but i cant think straight right now:
Randy is building a fence at the side of his warehouse.  He has 120 m of fencing and plans to use the side of the warehouse as one side of the rectangular fenced area.  What are the dimensions of the maximum area Randy can enclose.

heres the formula:

A=(120-21)(y)
please help!!
=Karma-Kills=
"Don't post while intoxicated."
+356|6829|England
A bit of AS Level maths you say? Ok here you go.

The whole question reads:



"a) Given that

(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = A + Bx^2 + Cx^4,

Find the value of the constants A, B and C."



Ive done that, A = 64, B = 160, C = 20

But then it says



"b) Using the substitution y = x^2 and your answer to part a) solve

(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 349."



I dont understand whtat the by substitutioin bit means...

I.E. (2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 64 + 160 x^2 + 20x^4 (from a)

So does it want you to solve 64 + 160y + 20(x^2)(y)

I tried this and got ~ +- 30, which is way off.

*Confused*

PS the answer is given in the back of the book if you want.

Karma for the working solution!

Last edited by =Karma-Kills= (2006-12-21 10:49:59)

r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6693

=Karma-Kills= wrote:

A bit of AS Level maths you say? Ok here you go.

The whole question reads:



"a) Given that

(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = A + Bx^2 + Cx^4,

Find the value of the constants A, B and C."



Ive done that, A = 64, B = 160, C = 20

But then it says



"b) Using the substitution y = x^2 and your answer to part a) solve

(2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 349."



I dont understand whtat the by substitutioin bit means...

I.E. (2 + x)^5 + (2 - x)^5 = 64 + 160 x^2 + 20x^4 (from a)

So does it want you to solve 64 + 160y + 20(x^2)(y)

I tried this and got ~ +- 30, which is way off.

*Confused*

PS the answer is given in the back of the book if you want.

Karma for the working solution!
whats the answer? so if i got it right i will post my working
=Karma-Kills=
"Don't post while intoxicated."
+356|6829|England
Ok the answer is

+/- Square root of 3/2

Ya get it?

Thanks for trying anyways
r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6693

=Karma-Kills= wrote:

Ok the answer is

+/- Square root of 3/2

Ya get it?

Thanks for trying anyways
cool, I got that xD

20x^4+160x^2-285=0          I just took -285 from both sides.
x^2(20x^2+160)-285=0       Factorise

Now u replace each x^2 with Y

Y(20Y+160)-285
20Y^2 + 160Y -285       Now u have a quadratic equation involving Y
so Y= 1.5 or -9.5 ( I used my calculator to find out this)

Subsitute 1.5 back into one of the equations either 20x^3+160x^2=285 or y=x^2
I used the y=x^2 cuz its easier
1.5=x^2
so X=  +- square root of 1.5

U can't use the -9.5 cuz u can't square root -ve number

Last edited by rabee2789b (2006-12-22 07:25:09)

Mong0ose
Will it blend?
+24|6731|UK

rabee2789b wrote:

U can't use the -9.5 cuz u can't square root -ve number
Thats not technically true, the square root of a negative number is a complex number

i.e. (-1)^0.5 = i (or j; depending on where you are taught and the convention you use)

These complex numbers are used when converting equations from the time domain into dimensionless equations, can be very useful

Good work on solving the problem above though
r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6693

Mong0ose wrote:

rabee2789b wrote:

U can't use the -9.5 cuz u can't square root -ve number
Thats not technically true, the square root of a negative number is a complex number

i.e. (-1)^0.5 = i (or j; depending on where you are taught and the convention you use)

These complex numbers are used when converting equations from the time domain into dimensionless equations, can be very useful

Good work on solving the problem above though
Yes, but hes doing AS Maths, hes not meant to know how to square root -ve number. If hes doing Further maths I would agree abut wut ur saying ^^

Last edited by rabee2789b (2006-12-22 07:44:54)

adam1503
Member
+85|6633|Manchester, UK

Nessie09 wrote:

No idea, but since we are doing homework: (yes this was in the math topic aswell)
http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/9/26613451733.jpg(click to enlarge)
prove that ED is parallel to CF

been working on this all day, but can't figure it out
You could solve this using vestors and what-not.

CF=CG+GF
ED=EG+GD

Now, CG is parallel to GD and EG is parallel to GF.  As the two vectors CF and ED can be written as their component vectors, all of which are parallel, then CF and ED must be parallel.
=Karma-Kills=
"Don't post while intoxicated."
+356|6829|England
rabee2789b - thanks.

Yeh i have heard about real and fake numbers and all that... but havent really been taught it (i did Further Maths for GCSE, but only doing normal A level now).

Anyways thanks a lot, i see how you got it and it all makes sense.

All i needed to do was replace the remaining x^2 with a y... *slaps forehead*

Easy when you know how eh?!

Last edited by =Karma-Kills= (2006-12-22 10:57:26)

r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6693

=Karma-Kills= wrote:

rabee2789b - thanks.

Yeh i have heard about real and fake numbers and all that... but havent really been taught it (i did Further Maths for GCSE, but only doing normal A level now).

Anyways thanks a lot, i see how you got it and it all makes sense.

All i needed to do was replace the remaining x^2 with a y... *slaps forehead*

Easy when you know how eh?!
np welcome

like ur sig btw
=Karma-Kills=
"Don't post while intoxicated."
+356|6829|England
Got some more!

*Feels dumb for posting so much in this thread*

Logs now...

"Calculate the value of y for which 2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2"

That reads, "2 log to the base 3 of y - log to the base 3 of (y + 4) = 2 if that helps....


This is my attempt:

2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2

log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1

Then the tricky bit, im pretty sure you have to use the Laws of Logs to combine the 2 minuses into 1 divide (e.g something like "log (to the base 3) y / 2(Y+4) )

But im not sure how to excatly.

I can tell you the answer is 12...

Any help (and solutions!) gets +1!

Oh and please clarify what would y / (y + 4) equal? Something like 4y^-1?

Thanks guys
Coolbeano
Level 13.5 BF2S Ninja Penguin Sensei
+378|7008

My homework:

Identify a single absolute truth that is eternally and universally true.

My best guess is 'All absolutes are false'... which itself is an absolute which means it is false, which rectifies the statement due to the fact it is an absolute. I think.


Rawrgh.
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6738|N. Ireland
say "{your teacher's name} is gay" and watch your class love you.
Archer
rapes face
+161|6669|Canuckistan
2 + 2 = ?

wtf mang this question is boterin me fr liek n hour lolol can some1 plz help me

teh teachr is so gey
=Karma-Kills=
"Don't post while intoxicated."
+356|6829|England
Wehay.

I answered my own question.

Any one who wonders, the key is

log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1

Take the half back up as a power and then use Law of Logs to divide... easy peasy
r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6693

=Karma-Kills= wrote:

Got some more!

*Feels dumb for posting so much in this thread*

Logs now...

"Calculate the value of y for which 2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2"

That reads, "2 log to the base 3 of y - log to the base 3 of (y + 4) = 2 if that helps....


This is my attempt:

2 log (to the base 3) y - log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 2

log (to the base 3) y - 1/2 log (to the base 3) (y + 4) = 1

Then the tricky bit, im pretty sure you have to use the Laws of Logs to combine the 2 minuses into 1 divide (e.g something like "log (to the base 3) y / 2(Y+4) )

But im not sure how to excatly.

I can tell you the answer is 12...

Any help (and solutions!) gets +1!

Oh and please clarify what would y / (y + 4) equal? Something like 4y^-1?

Thanks guys
2log3y-log3(y+4)=2
log3 Y^2 - log3 (y+4)=2
log3 (y^2)/(y+4)=2

3^2= (y^2)/(y+4)
9= (y^2)/(y+4)
y^2-9y-36
(y-12)(y+3)
so Y=12 or Y=-3
hence u can't log -ve number, so the answer is 12!

Last edited by rabee2789b (2007-01-20 10:07:11)

Vub
The Power of Two
+188|6739|Sydney, Australia

Archer wrote:

2 + 2 = ?

wtf mang this question is boterin me fr liek n hour lolol can some1 plz help me

teh teachr is so gey
4
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|6984|Toronto | Canada

Hey everyone i really need my question answered in the next half hour or so and i would really appreciate any help

My question

Prove the identity  (Trigonometric identities)

1 / (1-cosx) + 1 / (1+cosx) = 2 / (sin^2x)


I really need the help badly!!
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|6984|Toronto | Canada

bump ^^^^^
gene_pool
Banned
+519|6866|Gold coast, Aus.
err....


I hope to god im not doing that level of maths any time soon....
Coolbeano
Level 13.5 BF2S Ninja Penguin Sensei
+378|7008

Man I remember doing trigonometric identities/proofs two years ago... they were really annoying, proofs and identities are possibly the hardest thing you'll ever do in math.

Can't help you though, I forgot all my identities. Give me a list of the identities and I can try.
notorious
Nay vee, bay bee.
+1,396|6992|The United Center
Yeah, I did proofs and identities over four years ago...I can't remember anything about them.

If it's something to do with English, I can probably help you...math...not so much.  I haven't taken a math class in three years.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard