The UN keeps sending deadlines to Iran to stop their nuclear power research, when Iran probably has nukes since a while.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3481499.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3481499.stm
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Give me three nukes please and charge them to my credit card
Prove Iran has nukes.
For what this article says you can have a nuke in your garage.mafia996630 wrote:
Prove Iran has nukes.
, i dont have a garage.sergeriver wrote:
For what this article says you can have a nuke in your garage.mafia996630 wrote:
Prove Iran has nukes.
Maybe Saddam gave him Iraq's nuke before they were invaded.
No sale, we got lied to once before or and the apologists call it "faulty intelligence".
Let's not start another war we cannot handle.
No sale, we got lied to once before or and the apologists call it "faulty intelligence".
Let's not start another war we cannot handle.
You need to see this thread...stat!BN wrote:
Maybe Saddam gave him Iraq's nuke before they were invaded.
No sale, we got lied to once before or and the apologists call it "faulty intelligence".
Let's not start another war we cannot handle.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pid=794940#p794940
kk first of all saddam spend tonnes of money developing chemical weapons used in the iran-iraq war i duno if u ever herd of that but ever since he used those chemical weapons on the iranian army they havent exactly been tight haha so it wud be in his worst interest to give an enemy of his the means to destroy baghdad and on the topic of invading iran i dont think a conventional invasion would be necissary all you have to do is bomb their facilities for manufacturing these weapons and if iran had a nuke they would prove it as soon as possible in order to stop a possible us led attack to prevent a radical country such as that from aqquiring such weapons
I heard just today that Iran is far from developing nukes.
I think one of the key issues here is the Fatwa against nuclear weapons, and whether the Iranians will stick to it...if they're deeply religious they may well do.
Far from developing, yes, but from buying them? Read the article. Al-Qaeda itself could have a nuke.Spearhead wrote:
I heard just today that Iran is far from developing nukes.
I think if Al Qaeda had a nuke they'd actually use it, to show the world how completely futile the war on terrorism really is. They would not give or sell it to Iran.sergeriver wrote:
Far from developing, yes, but from buying them? Read the article. Al-Qaeda itself could have a nuke.Spearhead wrote:
I heard just today that Iran is far from developing nukes.
"The story begins in the early 1970s. An ambitious young Pakistani metallurgist Abdul Qadeer Khan (known in the style of the sub-continent by his initials AQ) was working in the Netherlands for a Dutch company called Physics Dynamic Research Laboratory."
I knew those damn Dutch were gonna get us into trouble.
Last edited by Rosse_modest (2006-09-22 05:04:27)
I don't understand why America has such an issue with Middle-Eastern nations developing nuclear weapons. They themselves have bunches of nukes at their disposal. They don't really mind North Korea making them. What's the deal?
In any case, there is no solid proof of Iran developing and/or buying nukes. Even if they did, what's the deal?
My two cents.
In any case, there is no solid proof of Iran developing and/or buying nukes. Even if they did, what's the deal?
My two cents.
If they are developing they are probably doing it in self defence. They dont want to end up like IraqTetrino wrote:
I don't understand why America has such an issue with Middle-Eastern nations developing nuclear weapons. They themselves have bunches of nukes at their disposal. They don't really mind North Korea making them. What's the deal?
In any case, there is no solid proof of Iran developing and/or buying nukes. Even if they did, what's the deal?
My two cents.
I didn't mean Al-Qaeda would sell the nuke to Iran, but Iran could buy it anywhere if the article is right.Rosse_modest wrote:
I think if Al Qaeda had a nuke they'd actually use it, to show the world how completely futile the war on terrorism really is. They would not give or sell it to Iran.sergeriver wrote:
Far from developing, yes, but from buying them? Read the article. Al-Qaeda itself could have a nuke.Spearhead wrote:
I heard just today that Iran is far from developing nukes.
Last edited by sergeriver (2006-09-22 05:03:46)
So can you.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't mean Al-Qaeda would sell the nuke to Iran, but Iran could buy it anywhere if the article is right.Rosse_modest wrote:
I think if Al Qaeda had a nuke they'd actually use it, to show the world how completely futile the war on terrorism really is. They would not give or sell it to Iran.sergeriver wrote:
Far from developing, yes, but from buying them? Read the article. Al-Qaeda itself could have a nuke.
I only skimmed the article, and from what I read it doesnt say anywhere that Iran can buy it. It only says they acquired equipment for fuel enrichment and may also have acquired technical expertise on the making of a nuclear weapon.
What else then do you need to make a nuke?Rosse_modest wrote:
So can you.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't mean Al-Qaeda would sell the nuke to Iran, but Iran could buy it anywhere if the article is right.Rosse_modest wrote:
I think if Al Qaeda had a nuke they'd actually use it, to show the world how completely futile the war on terrorism really is. They would not give or sell it to Iran.
I only skimmed the article, and from what I read it doesnt say anywhere that Iran can buy it. It only says they acquired equipment for fuel enrichment and may also have acquired technical expertise on the making of a nuclear weapon.
desiresergeriver wrote:
What else then do you need to make a nuke?
Weapons-grade nuclear material.sergeriver wrote:
What else then do you need to make a nuke?Rosse_modest wrote:
I only skimmed the article, and from what I read it doesnt say anywhere that Iran can buy it. It only says they acquired equipment for fuel enrichment and may also have acquired technical expertise on the making of a nuclear weapon.
Which is why the western world is so worried about Iran's nuclear program. They fear the Iran is enriching the material, which they have, to weapons-grade, not just nuclear power plants grade.
Last edited by lehter (2006-09-22 05:57:13)
I find it strange that some countries are somehow allowed to have nukes when others can't.
"-Look here lad, you give me those nukes right now or I swear there will be trouble!"
"But... You've got nukes."
"That's beside the point! We... Well... You... I'm one of the good guys you see? You belong to the bad guys and that's why we are entitled to have 'em!"
"Ergh... Run that by me again will ya?"
*Sigh*
"Right, we will take this castle by force!"
Sorry about the Python thingy there but I found this whole subject intriguing.
US - OK
France - OK
North Korea - Hell no!
Iran - Are you crazy?!
India - Ok (Even though they haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty)
Pakistan - Ok (Even though they haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty)
"-Look here lad, you give me those nukes right now or I swear there will be trouble!"
"But... You've got nukes."
"That's beside the point! We... Well... You... I'm one of the good guys you see? You belong to the bad guys and that's why we are entitled to have 'em!"
"Ergh... Run that by me again will ya?"
*Sigh*
"Right, we will take this castle by force!"
Sorry about the Python thingy there but I found this whole subject intriguing.
US - OK
France - OK
North Korea - Hell no!
Iran - Are you crazy?!
India - Ok (Even though they haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty)
Pakistan - Ok (Even though they haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty)
Last edited by Sambuccashake (2006-09-22 06:28:41)
Maybe because Amaidadajad(sp) has said specifically he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the planet. Also has made comments about destroying the Western world. I ran is also a terrorist supporting nation i.e. hezbolah (sp).Tetrino wrote:
I don't understand why America has such an issue with Middle-Eastern nations developing nuclear weapons. They themselves have bunches of nukes at their disposal. They don't really mind North Korea making them. What's the deal?
In any case, there is no solid proof of Iran developing and/or buying nukes. Even if they did, what's the deal?
My two cents.
So yeah lets let them develop nukes wipe out Israel and give nukes to terrorists. GREAT IDEA!!!!
And yes we mind North Korea making them. Why do u think all eyes were on N.K. when they were testing rockets.
There is a difference between the U.S. possessing nukes and Iran if you can not differentiate then you need to do some more research.
Read my above postSambuccashake wrote:
I find it strange that some countries are somehow allowed to have nukes when others can't.
"-Look here lad, you give me those nukes right now or I swear there will be trouble!"
"But... You've got nukes."
"That's beside the point! We... Well... You... I'm one of the good guys you see? You belong to the bad guys and that's why we are entitled to have 'em!"
"Ergh... Run that by me again will ya?"
*Sigh*
"Right, we will take this castle by force!"
Sorry about the Python thingy there but I found this whole subject intriguing.
Mr Bush, here's your nuclear armament checklist:
US - OK
France - OK
North Korea - Hell no!
Iran - Are you crazy?!
India - Ok (Even though they haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty)
Pakistan - Ok (Even though they haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty)
I'm gonna have to copy BN's answer here. Desire. The thing is this equipment can also just be used to enrich the stuff to power plant grade uranium. But this article doesn't say anything about Iran having or buying nuclear weapons, which is what you are saying.sergeriver wrote:
What else then do you need to make a nuke?Rosse_modest wrote:
So can you.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't mean Al-Qaeda would sell the nuke to Iran, but Iran could buy it anywhere if the article is right.
I only skimmed the article, and from what I read it doesnt say anywhere that Iran can buy it. It only says they acquired equipment for fuel enrichment and may also have acquired technical expertise on the making of a nuclear weapon.
Only problem is, right now I'm a little too lazy and tired to bother researching the whole "US can have nukes but Iran can't" thing, so if you would be so kind as to fill me in...Colfax wrote:
Maybe because Amaidadajad(sp) has said specifically he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the planet. Also has made comments about destroying the Western world. I ran is also a terrorist supporting nation i.e. hezbolah (sp).Tetrino wrote:
I don't understand why America has such an issue with Middle-Eastern nations developing nuclear weapons. They themselves have bunches of nukes at their disposal. They don't really mind North Korea making them. What's the deal?
In any case, there is no solid proof of Iran developing and/or buying nukes. Even if they did, what's the deal?
My two cents.
So yeah lets let them develop nukes wipe out Israel and give nukes to terrorists. GREAT IDEA!!!!
And yes we mind North Korea making them. Why do u think all eyes were on N.K. when they were testing rockets.
There is a difference between the U.S. possessing nukes and Iran if you can not differentiate then you need to do some more research.
The only difference I see is that Iran hasn't invaded anyone recently. Sure, they've done a lot of posturing but so has the U.S.Colfax wrote:
There is a difference between the U.S. possessing nukes and Iran if you can not differentiate then you need to do some more research.
I'm just guessing, I'm not sure, but the possibility exists.Rosse_modest wrote:
I'm gonna have to copy BN's answer here. Desire. The thing is this equipment can also just be used to enrich the stuff to power plant grade uranium. But this article doesn't say anything about Iran having or buying nuclear weapons, which is what you are saying.sergeriver wrote:
What else then do you need to make a nuke?Rosse_modest wrote:
So can you.
I only skimmed the article, and from what I read it doesnt say anywhere that Iran can buy it. It only says they acquired equipment for fuel enrichment and may also have acquired technical expertise on the making of a nuclear weapon.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Give me three nukes please and charge them to my credit card