Poll

Would you support a Military Coup to remove a Corrupted Government?

Yes62%62% - 89
No, democracy has tools to remove corrupted politicians37%37% - 54
Total: 143
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6893|Seattle, WA

sergeriver wrote:

If you read my previous posts all these questions were answered.
1-What does the Us take? 
http://www.worldwide-tax.com/.  Read and compare.
2-Whats your point with low taxes here? 
My point is when you spent more than you earn you have deficit, and this government has a huge one.
3-Ok every time anyone gets a paycheck, there is something called a "social security" tax
That's not an answer.  It's an statement.
4-Are you saying we need to RAISE taxes on SS?? 
I say you need to raise taxes in the US.  Social Security system has a surplus in fact but the government is saying there is a deficit there to call the privatization.
5-So why don't you think it would be a good idea?
As I mention before the SS privatization didn't work in a lot of countries.  SS is an issue that the government shoul take care of.  You can't sell the future of a lot of people to Insurance Companies and banks.
Thanks, finally you understood, I just wanted your opinion.

1- Yeah I know what it is, I was wondering why you think overall higher taxes would be such a wonderful thing with no responsibility with spending with EITHER party?

2-Yeah, but raising taxes and spending them in the wrong place is not very conducive either.

3- Yes I know but your statement about using taxes to pay for "social security" implied that there wasn't enough money being paid into "social security" so you obviously think we need to raise "social security" taxation????

4- Raise taxes by how much? HAH yeah SS is in surplus right now but not for long, its going to be gone in the not too distant future.

5- Government control, government control, government control, the forever beating drum of the Democrat ideology.
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6893|Seattle, WA

CameronPoe wrote:

I´ll answer by quoting what scrolled across the front of the US Mission to Cuba´s windows when I visited their today - Liberty does not come though imposition. Hypocritical but correct.
I disagree, how has Cuba not been anything but an imposition???

Let's see, one point in case, Castro's ban on elections in the late 1950's, and I have yet to see any source saying that that ban was repealed (correct me if I'm wrong).  But apart from the ban's present status, how is banning elections not an imposition of liberty.  Hypocritical, you better believe it.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

If you read my previous posts all these questions were answered.
1-What does the Us take? 
http://www.worldwide-tax.com/.  Read and compare.
2-Whats your point with low taxes here? 
My point is when you spent more than you earn you have deficit, and this government has a huge one.
3-Ok every time anyone gets a paycheck, there is something called a "social security" tax
That's not an answer.  It's an statement.
4-Are you saying we need to RAISE taxes on SS?? 
I say you need to raise taxes in the US.  Social Security system has a surplus in fact but the government is saying there is a deficit there to call the privatization.
5-So why don't you think it would be a good idea?
As I mention before the SS privatization didn't work in a lot of countries.  SS is an issue that the government shoul take care of.  You can't sell the future of a lot of people to Insurance Companies and banks.
Thanks, finally you understood, I just wanted your opinion.

1- Yeah I know what it is, I was wondering why you think overall higher taxes would be such a wonderful thing with no responsibility with spending with EITHER party?

2-Yeah, but raising taxes and spending them in the wrong place is not very conducive either.

3- Yes I know but your statement about using taxes to pay for "social security" implied that there wasn't enough money being paid into "social security" so you obviously think we need to raise "social security" taxation????

4- Raise taxes by how much? HAH yeah SS is in surplus right now but not for long, its going to be gone in the not too distant future.

5- Government control, government control, government control, the forever beating drum of the Democrat ideology.
1-I never said without responsibility with spending.

2-This government cut taxes and still is spending them in the wrong place.

3-No, I didn't say those words, what I meant is while there is a surplus in SS, there is a huge deficit in America's economy.

4-That's what they want the people think so they can start the SS privatization.

5-I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, the forever beating drum of Republican ideology.
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6893|Seattle, WA

sergeriver wrote:

1-I never said without responsibility with spending.

2-This government cut taxes and still is spending them in the wrong place.

3-No, I didn't say those words, what I meant is while there is a surplus in SS, there is a huge deficit in America's economy.

4-That's what they want the people think so they can start the SS privatization.

5-I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, the forever beating drum of Republican ideology.
1- I would agree with you and in reference to number 2

3- It certainly implied it, nice dodge again, do you think we need to raise "social security" taxation????

4- Want people to believe, how can you NOT believe it.  Look at this one fact: There were like some 50 tax payees when the program started (these are rough estimates) for every one retiree.  Now there are 2 for every retiree.  You don't think its dwindling???, you're blind and subscribing to your ideology for an answer if youy don't.  If i'm wrong, PLEASE explain to me how it is not running out of money, especially with boomers about to retire on a massive scale in the next 5-15 years.

5- How do I not give a shit if I'm talking about it???

Last edited by AlbertWesker[RE] (2006-09-23 18:44:44)

Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6939|Tampa Bay Florida
1- This numbering system is getting old

2- It's the internet, chill a little bit

3- I agree with sergeriver

4- But either one of you could be right under certain situations

5- I like cheese
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

1-I never said without responsibility with spending.

2-This government cut taxes and still is spending them in the wrong place.

3-No, I didn't say those words, what I meant is while there is a surplus in SS, there is a huge deficit in America's economy.

4-That's what they want the people think so they can start the SS privatization.

5-I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, I don't give a shit, the forever beating drum of Republican ideology.
1- I would agree with you and in reference to number 2

3- It certainly implied it, nice dodge again, do you think we need to raise "social security" taxation????

4- Want people to believe, how can you NOT believe it.  Look at this one fact: There were like some 50 tax payees when the program started (these are rough estimates) for every one retiree.  Now there are 2 for every retiree.  You don't think its dwindling???, you're blind and subscribing to your ideology for an answer if youy don't.  If i'm wrong, PLEASE explain to me how it is not running out of money, especially with boomers about to retire on a massive scale in the next 5-15 years.

5- How do I not give a shit if I'm talking about it???
3-I never said raise the SS tax, I said raise the income tax.

4-Today SS has a surplus, but if you ta ke a look into the next 50 years, in the way it is now it will have a deficit, but that doesn't mean you must make a SS privatization.

5-Small government = I don't give a shit.
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6893|Seattle, WA

sergeriver wrote:

3-I never said raise the SS tax, I said raise the income tax.

4-Today SS has a surplus, but if you ta ke a look into the next 50 years, in the way it is now it will have a deficit, but that doesn't mean you must make a SS privatization.

5-Small government = I don't give a shit.
3) Ok, I'll repeat another question that was unanswered BY HOW MUCH???

4) I agree.

5) Thats where our opinions differ.  I think by trying NOT to have the government control everything, that is giving a shit.  I could easily saying letting the government control everything or more stuff is NOT giving a shit.  Its all about our values and views.  Definitely not a fact, definitely our respective opinions.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

3-I never said raise the SS tax, I said raise the income tax.

4-Today SS has a surplus, but if you ta ke a look into the next 50 years, in the way it is now it will have a deficit, but that doesn't mean you must make a SS privatization.

5-Small government = I don't give a shit.
3) Ok, I'll repeat another question that was unanswered BY HOW MUCH???

4) I agree.

5) Thats where our opinions differ.  I think by trying NOT to have the government control everything, that is giving a shit.  I could easily saying letting the government control everything or more stuff is NOT giving a shit.  Its all about our values and views.  Definitely not a fact, definitely our respective opinions.
3-I think that is a question for Bush administration, but it is obvious that US is spending way far more than it is earning.  So, you can increase your incomes by improving your expos/impos balance or raising taxes.

5-I suppose these viewpoints differences don't imply we can't debate.

Last edited by sergeriver (2006-09-23 19:49:35)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Being a liberal means you don't want to work for a living?  Or you just talk about the people who kept out of the American dream and haven't been as lucky as you.  You know there are some requirements to get your social security check?  It must be pretty sad living in a bunker waiting to be bombed or invaded by immigrants.
In America today, if you are not living the American dream you have to look no further than in the mirror to find the one responsible.

No actually, I don't live in a bunker. You see, when you work for a living you earn money. With that money you can buy all kinds of shit. One of which is my new home. ( my 3rd new home).

As far as the invasion from Mexico, your, who cares attitude. is EXACTLY the liberal response that I appose and contributes to the problem....


And by the way, ALL I have and DON'T have is not by luck, it is by working for it, or not working hard enough for it. I take complete credit for all I have, and complete responsibility for all I want, and DON'T have.
Lowing, I also bought my home and my car and all the shit I have with the money I earn with my business.  But I also pay taxes and those taxes should be used among other things to help people with basic needs unsatisfied.  That's not communism, that's social security and if you forget your fellow country men and women in need, what are you defending your homeland for?
I pay taxes as well, and I have always maintained and supported my belief of helping those that help themselves, children and the disabled. Clearly, these are NOT the people I am talking about.

But again, if you think the low lifes of society vote conservative republican your head is in the sand. They vote for whoever is gunna give them the most shit for free and that AIN'T the republicans.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

Rosse_modest wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


In America today, if you are not living the American dream you have to look no further than in the mirror to find the one responsible.

No actually, I don't live in a bunker. You see, when you work for a living you earn money. With that money you can buy all kinds of shit. One of which is my new home. ( my 3rd new home).

As far as the invasion from Mexico, your, who cares attitude. is EXACTLY the liberal response that I appose and contributes to the problem....


And by the way, ALL I have and DON'T have is not by luck, it is by working for it, or not working hard enough for it. I take complete credit for all I have, and complete responsibility for all I want, and DON'T have.
Lowing, I also bought my home and my car and all the shit I have with the money I earn with my business.  But I also pay taxes and those taxes should be used among other things to help people with basic needs unsatisfied.  That's not communism, that's social security and if you forget your fellow country men and women in need, what are you defending your homeland for?
For the right to be an egotistical shortsighted fool.
LOL.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

Spearhead wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

There was once greed.... and then, there was lowing.
so  I am a racist AND  NOW I am greedy,..........how so??
"Leech money off of hard working Americans"

Whether you believe or not, lowing, most Americans are hard working.  Your little idea that all working class people are just too lazy to earn more money is very old and very cliche.  Believe it or not, most working class people aren't as smart, aren't as creative, and don't have as many opportunities as you.  Does that mean we shouldn't support them? 

As for the racist thing, you can't comprehend the fact that the white Europeans and Americans f*cked the African continent and culture pretty much beyond repair.  Black racism towards whites at least has some truth and meaning, but the vice versa is just plain racism.  If you hate it when blacks happen to call you "white boy" or "kracker", then live with it.  If you are personally offended, then ignore them.  There are racists in every race, the sooner we realize that stereotyping is BS, the sooner racism will end
Not really sure where you got the idea that I was rich sitting behind a mahgony desk on the 89th floor of some skyscraper in NY. I AM of the working class. I never said a thing about not supporting people. I SAID I do NOT want to support ANYONE that does not have the personal responsibility to support himself. Anyone that has lost their job do to lay-offs...LIKE ME,( I never took 1 dime of unemployment though, I hit the bricks and found work) has unemployment to help them get back on their feet. I support that. That person HAD a job and do to circumstances beyond their control they lost it. BUT HE HAD A JOB!!!

I do not want to support ANYONE that is able bodied with 2 arms and 2 legs and mentaly fit but is just too lazy, or drunk or high or illegal to get a fuckin job!!.......Why is that so hard for you to get behind??
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

In America today, if you are not living the American dream you have to look no further than in the mirror to find the one responsible.

No actually, I don't live in a bunker. You see, when you work for a living you earn money. With that money you can buy all kinds of shit. One of which is my new home. ( my 3rd new home).

As far as the invasion from Mexico, your, who cares attitude. is EXACTLY the liberal response that I appose and contributes to the problem....


And by the way, ALL I have and DON'T have is not by luck, it is by working for it, or not working hard enough for it. I take complete credit for all I have, and complete responsibility for all I want, and DON'T have.
Lowing, I also bought my home and my car and all the shit I have with the money I earn with my business.  But I also pay taxes and those taxes should be used among other things to help people with basic needs unsatisfied.  That's not communism, that's social security and if you forget your fellow country men and women in need, what are you defending your homeland for?
I pay taxes as well, and I have always maintained and supported my belief of helping those that help themselves, children and the disabled. Clearly, these are NOT the people I am talking about.

But again, if you think the low lifes of society vote conservative republican your head is in the sand. They vote for whoever is gunna give them the most shit for free and that AIN'T the republicans.
Would you pls explain what the low lifes of society are?  I don't get the concecpt.

Last edited by sergeriver (2006-09-23 19:51:27)

topthrill05
Member
+125|6827|Rochester NY USA

Spearhead wrote:

topthrill05 wrote:

"Black racism towards whites at least has some truth and meaning, but the vice versa is just plain racism.  If you hate it when blacks happen to call you "white boy" or "kracker", then live with it.  If you are personally offended, then ignore them."

Is that a joke? So if I call someone a dumb nigger because they can't speak english or write it then I am not being a raciest because it has some truth too it? How about my great grandfather raped your great grandmother, should I still take shit for it?

Your logic is flawed.
You know what I freaking mean.  Tell me the last time blacks invaded a white country and turned them into slaves.  If you went tp Africa, and didn't speak a word of their language, does that mean that you are dumb white trash?  The African that doesn't speak english could be a preacher, or a lawyer.  That doesn't mean they're a "dumb nigger".  Classifying someone as a "dumb nigger" is racist in itself.  Call them dumb, a hobo, or a lowlife criminal.  But using the word "nigger" is plain racism.  Are you saying that white people who don't speak english or write it are dumb niggers as well?  White people rape eachother, too, you know.

Your logic is flawed.
WTF! Really man. I basically said that your logic was flawed with a few simple questions. Somehow you turned them into my statements. My whole post was too show how messed up that logic was. My raping statement had nothing too do with race either I was stating how once again your logic is flawed in a question.

Maybe you just need to Re-read what I wrote up there. Once you get what my logic is maybe we can have a nice little debate.
topthrill05
Member
+125|6827|Rochester NY USA

sergeriver wrote:

Would you pls explain what the low lifes of society are?  I don't get the concecpt.
People who think the goverment should give them money and a blowjob on their birthday.

Really I am sick of paying for the lazy American.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Lowing, I also bought my home and my car and all the shit I have with the money I earn with my business.  But I also pay taxes and those taxes should be used among other things to help people with basic needs unsatisfied.  That's not communism, that's social security and if you forget your fellow country men and women in need, what are you defending your homeland for?
I pay taxes as well, and I have always maintained and supported my belief of helping those that help themselves, children and the disabled. Clearly, these are NOT the people I am talking about.

But again, if you think the low lifes of society vote conservative republican your head is in the sand. They vote for whoever is gunna give them the most shit for free and that AIN'T the republicans.
Would you pls explain what the low lifes of society are?  I don't get the concecpt.
You know exactly who I am talking about serge, so please spare me your BS.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6924|Canberra, AUS

topthrill05 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Would you pls explain what the low lifes of society are?  I don't get the concecpt.
People who think the goverment should give them money and a blowjob on their birthday.

Really I am sick of paying for the lazy American.
But how do you quantify something like that? How do you see how many 'lazy Americans' there are when you give that description? Give us a more general, measurable bracket (e.g. income, background), so we can actually test your claim.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

Spark wrote:

topthrill05 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Would you pls explain what the low lifes of society are?  I don't get the concecpt.
People who think the goverment should give them money and a blowjob on their birthday.

Really I am sick of paying for the lazy American.
But how do you quantify something like that? How do you see how many 'lazy Americans' there are when you give that description? Give us a more general, measurable bracket (e.g. income, background), so we can actually test your claim.
People on welfare as a life style and not as a tempory hand up

addicts

40 year olds that have never made more 15,000 a year, yet have 7 kids

People that need my tax dollars to feed their kids but have enough money to buy beer, smokes and lottery tickets.

People that don't want to work because they are holding out for a managers position.

multiple felons   

Assholes that wear their pants 10 sizes too big and half way around their asses that complain how they are being kept down.

ILLEGAL ALIENS.

and last but certainly not least ........All of the modern day liberals out there that feel we need to "understand and show compasion" for people in the above list, and pump even more money into programs that keep supporting them.
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6893|Seattle, WA

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:

topthrill05 wrote:


People who think the goverment should give them money and a blowjob on their birthday.

Really I am sick of paying for the lazy American.
But how do you quantify something like that? How do you see how many 'lazy Americans' there are when you give that description? Give us a more general, measurable bracket (e.g. income, background), so we can actually test your claim.
People on welfare as a life style and not as a tempory hand up

addicts

40 year olds that have never made more 15,000 a year, yet have 7 kids

People that need my tax dollars to feed their kids but have enough money to buy beer, smokes and lottery tickets.

People that don't want to work because they are holding out for a managers position.

multiple felons   

Assholes that wear their pants 10 sizes too big and half way around their asses that complain how they are being kept down.

ILLEGAL ALIENS.

and last but certainly not least ........All of the modern day liberals out there that feel we need to "understand and show compasion" for people in the above list, and pump even more money into programs that keep supporting them.
There is not really a claim to test here...the above are people that probably just piss off lowing and people like myself when we work are asses off and are told we need to pay more taxes to help people who don't *@#&*(@ deserve it.  People who are TRULY in need like those busting their ass, and on welfare, and those who truly need aid, I have no problem with that, but if you don't have legitimate reason, than its time to f*** off. 
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

topthrill05 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Would you pls explain what the low lifes of society are?  I don't get the concecpt.
People who think the goverment should give them money and a blowjob on their birthday.

Really I am sick of paying for the lazy American.
Do you have statistics?  You should think that not all the people has your luck, then you may change your viewpoint m8.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:

topthrill05 wrote:

People who think the goverment should give them money and a blowjob on their birthday.

Really I am sick of paying for the lazy American.
But how do you quantify something like that? How do you see how many 'lazy Americans' there are when you give that description? Give us a more general, measurable bracket (e.g. income, background), so we can actually test your claim.
People on welfare as a life style and not as a tempory hand up

addicts

40 year olds that have never made more 15,000 a year, yet have 7 kids

People that need my tax dollars to feed their kids but have enough money to buy beer, smokes and lottery tickets.

People that don't want to work because they are holding out for a managers position.

multiple felons   

Assholes that wear their pants 10 sizes too big and half way around their asses that complain how they are being kept down.

ILLEGAL ALIENS.

and last but certainly not least ........All of the modern day liberals out there that feel we need to "understand and show compasion" for people in the above list, and pump even more money into programs that keep supporting them.
Lowing while you talk you make Hitler look like Sponge Bob.
Again, Liberal is not an insult.  So keep saying the word that you are not insulting anyone.
Please do you have a source with a reliable statistics about this issue or are you just generalizing?
I don't think those programs go to "managers" waiting for a position.  The illegal immigrants is another issue.
I agree that is not a US government fault and that US or any country shouldn't spend any money on illegal people, if you wanna stay arrange your situation first, that's fair.
But, the other people in the list how do you know they don't want to work, show me a source.

Last edited by sergeriver (2006-09-24 05:33:05)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:


But how do you quantify something like that? How do you see how many 'lazy Americans' there are when you give that description? Give us a more general, measurable bracket (e.g. income, background), so we can actually test your claim.
People on welfare as a life style and not as a tempory hand up

addicts

40 year olds that have never made more 15,000 a year, yet have 7 kids

People that need my tax dollars to feed their kids but have enough money to buy beer, smokes and lottery tickets.

People that don't want to work because they are holding out for a managers position.

multiple felons   

Assholes that wear their pants 10 sizes too big and half way around their asses that complain how they are being kept down.

ILLEGAL ALIENS.

and last but certainly not least ........All of the modern day liberals out there that feel we need to "understand and show compasion" for people in the above list, and pump even more money into programs that keep supporting them.
There is not really a claim to test here...the above are people that probably just piss off lowing and people like myself when we work are asses off and are told we need to pay more taxes to help people who don't *@#&*(@ deserve it.  People who are TRULY in need like those busting their ass, and on welfare, and those who truly need aid, I have no problem with that, but if you don't have legitimate reason, than its time to f*** off. 
At least you admit that there are people with genuine needs and not only lazy dudes, which there must be also.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:


But how do you quantify something like that? How do you see how many 'lazy Americans' there are when you give that description? Give us a more general, measurable bracket (e.g. income, background), so we can actually test your claim.
People on welfare as a life style and not as a tempory hand up

addicts

40 year olds that have never made more 15,000 a year, yet have 7 kids

People that need my tax dollars to feed their kids but have enough money to buy beer, smokes and lottery tickets.

People that don't want to work because they are holding out for a managers position.

multiple felons   

Assholes that wear their pants 10 sizes too big and half way around their asses that complain how they are being kept down.

ILLEGAL ALIENS.

and last but certainly not least ........All of the modern day liberals out there that feel we need to "understand and show compasion" for people in the above list, and pump even more money into programs that keep supporting them.
Lowing while you talk you make Hitler look like Sponge Bob.
Please do you have a source with a reliable statistics about this issue or are you just generalizing?
I don't think those programs go to "managers" waiting for a position.  The illegal immigrants is another issue.
I agree that is not a US government fault and that US or any country shouldn't spend any money on illegal people, if you wanna stay arrange your situation first, that's fair.
But, the other people in the list how do you know they don't want to work, show me a source.
You're kidding right???.............You ACTUALLY want me to PROVE to you that there are lazy pieces of shit living in America??????!!!


Get fucking real please.
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6893|Seattle, WA

sergeriver wrote:

At least you admit that there are people with genuine needs and not only lazy dudes, which there must be also.
Of course there are, and I hope you understand there are quite a few people, probably the bare majority(51%) on welfare that really don't need to be, and could save the government I CRAP LOAD of money if they just got off their ass and got a job, not to be cliche, but seriously.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7006|Argentina

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

At least you admit that there are people with genuine needs and not only lazy dudes, which there must be also.
Of course there are, and I hope you understand there are quite a few people, probably the bare majority(51%) on welfare that really don't need to be, and could save the government I CRAP LOAD of money if they just got off their ass and got a job, not to be cliche, but seriously.
I don't say there are no people taking advantage of government, but do you know the statistics about this?  You can't cut the help to people in real need for some assholes.  It's a government duty to detect these people taking advantage of the system and cutting them from the benefits they receive.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6900|USA

sergeriver wrote:

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

lowing wrote:

People on welfare as a life style and not as a tempory hand up

addicts

40 year olds that have never made more 15,000 a year, yet have 7 kids

People that need my tax dollars to feed their kids but have enough money to buy beer, smokes and lottery tickets.

People that don't want to work because they are holding out for a managers position.

multiple felons   

Assholes that wear their pants 10 sizes too big and half way around their asses that complain how they are being kept down.

ILLEGAL ALIENS.

and last but certainly not least ........All of the modern day liberals out there that feel we need to "understand and show compasion" for people in the above list, and pump even more money into programs that keep supporting them.
There is not really a claim to test here...the above are people that probably just piss off lowing and people like myself when we work are asses off and are told we need to pay more taxes to help people who don't *@#&*(@ deserve it.  People who are TRULY in need like those busting their ass, and on welfare, and those who truly need aid, I have no problem with that, but if you don't have legitimate reason, than its time to f*** off. 
At least you admit that there are people with genuine needs and not only lazy dudes, which there must be also.
Sergeriver, I have given more of myself and money to help people in my community than you will ever give me credit for, ( and no I am not looking for recognition). If you really need an example though, as a father of 2 children I am a little sensative when I drive by a lemonaide stand with a couple of 7 year olds trying to EARN some money. I always have stopped at these stands and bought a .25 cent styrofoam cup of lemonaide for whatever I had in my pocket. I reason that these kids aren't begging for money, they are trying to EARN money and I wanted to recognize that and support that. I have bought a $20.00 cup of lemonaide before. I have done more, but DEFINATELY reserve my generousity for helping those that help themselves. I have said that before, yet you seem to ALWAYS leave that portion out  whenever you are quoting me to prove your point that I am Hitler.

Last edited by lowing (2006-09-24 05:47:07)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard