BF2S Forums Don't you miss this Guy?

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

Sure I'll agree that they WANTED to go for oil, I'm not disputing that, but WHERE IS IT?!??!!? DID those things conjectured in those sources ACTUALLY happen? I think not.  I have no need to provide sources as the burden of proof is on your side of the arguement.  You are trying to contend that a LARGE amount of oil was stolen from the Iraqi people.  Where is it? Not my question to prove, yours.

I'm getting into the politician suit, and I have to say I don't have any comments on that subject.

LOL, just LOL.

You can neither confirm nor deny that any oil was ever stolen or moved.  Good move, your approval rating just went up 2 percent.

Seriously talking, I think they went after oil, but I can't confirm where the oil is going yet.

Storgie wrote:

someone here said that if this war was over oil why was he paying over three a gallon, well it is not being fought for us the consumers, it is being for for cooperate America, and they want bigger profits.

Do you people ever actually think for yourselves, or do you just watch talk shows on TV and parrot the same ridiculous ideas you hear from those wackos the networks use for ratings? 

Also. . .what is this cooperate America of which you speak?

Jesus Christ. . .and i thought Dubya was an idiot when it came to the English language.

I.M.I Militant wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Visit these links and then tell me the guy sucks.  I don't understand why people criticize him.  Do you think GWB would do something like this?  Don't tell he's supporting his wife for 2008.  While GWB is destroying thousands of lifes for oil, this guy does charity.  And this is not propaganda, this is a real fact.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr29Lx8dUpg

http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/ … ;srcid=346

preach mate weather he was unfaithful or not is a totally dif matter.. people wanted him to resign because of it... but hes job is to MANAGE THE COUNTRY he aient going for husband of the year award

he did hes job well and then GWB comes in and makes bill look even better lol!!!

So, please. . .name all the good things Bill Clinton did.  And no. . .you can't use "the economy" as one of the points because he didn't do jack shit for the economy.

Here, I'll take the other side of the coin to get us started.  The bad things Clinton did:

1.  Gave nuclear secrets away to North Korea.

2.  Lied to the country and a Grand Jury about getting his knob slobbed in the Oval Office and sticking cigars in Monica Lewinsky's fat "kitty" and then smoking them (that's just plain gross by the way).

3.  Mogadishu

4.  Not killing/capturing Osama bin Laden on several occasions when it was easy to do so.

5.  Bosnia

That's just a few to get started.

Here's a link to help you out too in case you need a cheatsheet.

http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/articles/ … inton.html

And by the way. . .I don't like Dubya either.  Just Clinton was close to as bad as Bush is. . .just Clinton could string coherent sentences together and convince people he knew what the hell he was doing.

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

I.M.I Militant wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Visit these links and then tell me the guy sucks.  I don't understand why people criticize him.  Do you think GWB would do something like this?  Don't tell he's supporting his wife for 2008.  While GWB is destroying thousands of lifes for oil, this guy does charity.  And this is not propaganda, this is a real fact.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr29Lx8dUpg

http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/ … ;srcid=346

preach mate weather he was unfaithful or not is a totally dif matter.. people wanted him to resign because of it... but hes job is to MANAGE THE COUNTRY he aient going for husband of the year award

he did hes job well and then GWB comes in and makes bill look even better lol!!!

So, please. . .name all the good things Bill Clinton did.  And no. . .you can't use "the economy" as one of the points because he didn't do jack shit for the economy.

Here, I'll take the other side of the coin to get us started.  The bad things Clinton did:

1.  Gave nuclear secrets away to North Korea.

2.  Lied to the country and a Grand Jury about getting his knob slobbed in the Oval Office and sticking cigars in Monica Lewinsky's fat "kitty" and then smoking them (that's just plain gross by the way).

3.  Mogadishu

4.  Not killing/capturing Osama bin Laden on several occasions when it was easy to do so.

5.  Bosnia

That's just a few to get started.

Here's a link to help you out too in case you need a cheatsheet.

http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/articles/ … inton.html

And by the way. . .I don't like Dubya either.  Just Clinton was close to as bad as Bush is. . .just Clinton could string coherent sentences together and convince people he knew what the hell he was doing.

Do you ever actually think for yourself, or do you just watch talk shows on TV and parrot the same ridiculous ideas you hear from those wackos the networks use for ratings?

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

So, please. . .name all the good things Bill Clinton did.  And no. . .you can't use "the economy" as one of the points because he didn't do jack shit for the economy.

Here, I'll take the other side of the coin to get us started.  The bad things Clinton did:

1.  Gave nuclear secrets away to North Korea.

2.  Lied to the country and a Grand Jury about getting his knob slobbed in the Oval Office and sticking cigars in Monica Lewinsky's fat "kitty" and then smoking them (that's just plain gross by the way).

3.  Mogadishu

4.  Not killing/capturing Osama bin Laden on several occasions when it was easy to do so.

5.  Bosnia

That's just a few to get started.

Here's a link to help you out too in case you need a cheatsheet.

http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/articles/ … inton.html

And by the way. . .I don't like Dubya either.  Just Clinton was close to as bad as Bush is. . .just Clinton could string coherent sentences together and convince people he knew what the hell he was doing.

Do you ever actually think for yourself, or do you just watch talk shows on TV and parrot the same ridiculous ideas you hear from those wackos the networks use for ratings?

Actually I study up and hang out with a bunch of political science majors at my university.  Refute any of what I just said.  Please.

1-Proof?

2-Clinton's mistake.

3-Clinton's mistake.  But he wanted to help there.

4-Proof?

5-Clinton's right in Bosnia.  He helped to remove Milosevic from there.

This is neutral.
http://www.australianpolitics.com/usa/c … tyears.pdf

sergeriver wrote:

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Do you ever actually think for yourself, or do you just watch talk shows on TV and parrot the same ridiculous ideas you hear from those wackos the networks use for ratings?

Actually I study up and hang out with a bunch of political science majors at my university.  Refute any of what I just said.  Please.

1-Proof?

2-Clinton's mistake.

3-Clinton's mistake.  But he wanted to help there.

4-Proof?

5-Clinton's right in Bosnia.  He helped to remove Milosevic from there.

This is neutral.
http://www.australianpolitics.com/usa/c … tyears.pdf

1.  Clinton had help with Carter to appease Kim Jong Il the first time he decided to play pushy pushy with the USA.  Common knowledge but I can get you proof.

4.  Clinton just freaking admitted it in the interview with Chris Wallace he screwed up with bin Laden. 

5.  Then Bush is right in helping remove Saddam from Iraq.  Also, there weren't 200-500 THOUSAND people found in mass graves in Bosnia like there were in Iraq.....

And "lol" at your source being neutral.  Nice joke.

Last edited by Aenima_Eyes (2006-09-24 17:45:10)

Stoman wrote:

Mogadishu and Bosnia? Correct me if I'm wrong but I think they were caused by Warlords and Muslims respectively. Sorry Aenima_Eyes but would you rather the free world didn't step in when thousand of people are being slaughtered?

Did I say what parts of those Clinton screwed up?  No.

In regards to Mogadishu. . .Clinton screwed up in being a pansy and pulling our troops out after the Black Hawk Down incident.  Thousands of people DID get slaughtered when our troops left.  Whoops.

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

Actually I study up and hang out with a bunch of political science majors at my university.  Refute any of what I just said.  Please.

1-Proof?

2-Clinton's mistake.

3-Clinton's mistake.  But he wanted to help there.

4-Proof?

5-Clinton's right in Bosnia.  He helped to remove Milosevic from there.

This is neutral.
http://www.australianpolitics.com/usa/c … tyears.pdf

1.  Clinton had help with Carter to appease Kim Jong Il the first time he decided to play pushy pushy with the USA.  Common knowledge but I can get you proof.

4.  Clinton just freaking admitted it in the interview with Chris Wallace he screwed up with bin Laden. 

5.  Then Bush is right in helping remove Saddam from Iraq.  Also, there weren't 200-500 THOUSAND people found in mass graves in Bosnia like there were in Iraq.....

And "lol" at your source being neutral.  Nice joke.

1-You can't proof.

4-First he owned that asshole bad, and second he said "I tried to kill Bin Laden and I failed", but he did try.

5-There was no oil in Yugoslavia, that was done just for help.  If you buy Bush BS that he went to Iraq to help oppressed people the you are too naive.

Well, what do you want me to put a link to fox news?

Aenima_Eyes wrote:

Stoman wrote:

Mogadishu and Bosnia? Correct me if I'm wrong but I think they were caused by Warlords and Muslims respectively. Sorry Aenima_Eyes but would you rather the free world didn't step in when thousand of people are being slaughtered?

Did I say what parts of those Clinton screwed up?  No.

In regards to Mogadishu. . .Clinton screwed up in being a pansy and pulling our troops out after the Black Hawk Down incident.  Thousands of people DID get slaughtered when our troops left.  Whoops.

They are lucky he took them out.  They would be dead now if he would have left the troops in Somalia.