BF2S Forums Don't you miss this Guy?

ilyandor wrote:

King_County_Downy wrote:

Why do I pay $3/gallon if we were there to take their oil?

arizona = $2.39/gallon...
UK = 9 GBP/gallon...

hahaha!!!

That is because we by WAY more than GB.

Big McLargehuge wrote:

All them tanks and air planes ain't free ya know.

QFT.  I don't like Bush or Clinton, but having been in the military during both administrations, I will take Bush any day.

sergeriver wrote:

How can you compare Clinton, an excellent president, with this guy, called to be one of the worse presidents in America history.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 04_pf.html

Do you know 80% of the print media in the US votes democrat, especially the WP ?  So don't post this crap because it is bias.

I don't recall Clinton being called an excellent president while he was in office. Recall that scandal with the intern?

DesertFox423 wrote:

I don't recall Clinton being called an excellent president while he was in office. Recall that scandal with the intern?

Big deal.  The man was doing his job and had a blow job.  GWB is doing his job?

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

How can you compare Clinton, an excellent president, with this guy, called to be one of the worse presidents in America history.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 04_pf.html

Do you know 80% of the print media in the US votes democrat, especially the WP ?  So don't post this crap because it is bias.

May be they had a better education than others.

Some of the stupidest people I have ever meet were college graduates.

sergeriver wrote:

DesertFox423 wrote:

I don't recall Clinton being called an excellent president while he was in office. Recall that scandal with the intern?

Big deal.  The man was doing his job and had a blow job.  GWB is doing his job?

Clinton fucked up a lot of shit that lead to 9/11, lets not overlook that.  And for any President to say "Depends what the definition of is is" should not be considered an excellent president.'

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-09-20 18:52:06)

And sergeriver, you keep saying "It was just a blowjob."  Do you not understand that because of that all of his foreign policy decisions had to be adjusted so it wouldn't look like he was doing it just to divert attention?  Where are all the conspiracy people saying Clinton had the USS Cole attacked to cover up his BJ?  You don't see that do you?  Where was the attack after the Cole?  A few cruise missiles that didn't hit anything important...wow.  He didn't want to attack too strong because it would look bad because of the Monica thing.  So it was not "just a blowjob."

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-09-20 18:58:53)

Ya, but tards some people don't understand that. He has to be AT the White House 24/7 or he's not doing his job.

sergeriver wrote:

I don't believe there are so many people that support GWB when the man is doing nothing and you criticize Clinton for having the job done (both of em).

Could you explain What "Both of em" Means. Because i sure hope it doesnt mean Terrorism. Because your so far off base its not even on radar bud.

oug wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

How can you compare Clinton, an excellent president, with this guy, called to be one of the worse presidents in America history.

Clinton wasn't such an excellent president, and he too had some wars going...  Yugoslavia ring a bell? or is that way back for you guys to remember? Of course, all this stuff is essentially played down due to the severity of current events but lets not wipe them completely...


and here's something to play with (I know its old but now its way more satisfying )

http://www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/georgie.htm

ANY wars Clinton had Ummm Going, were with our troops as part of the UN peace keeping forces. You know, the guys with Blue helmets that stood around while people walked by and dragged people passed them in Kosavo and Killed and beheadded them while the blue hats did nothing. Those were Not wars as far as the US was concerned. It didnt turn into a war UNTIL fineally the US stepped in and said Thats enough, and stuck a boot up the UN's ass. The amount of Killing the UN allowed until Someone grew balls in the US, was Dissgusting.

The UN is boasting about how they have 50,000 Blue hats on the ground world wide, But with WHAT mandate? Ill tell you what Mandate, TO SIT AND WATCH! They will NOT step in and save a life. Until the UN decides to stop Playing babysitter and really take the job seriousely They are nothing but a show piece that Noone in the world is afraid of. The UN Could be A force to be reconed with if they would Just grow some balls. With All the equipment from all the countries involved, the world could be a better lplace. Also, The UN would be better served if it required a comittmebnt from each country of atleast a certain set number of troops incase needed in a military action. This should be required for the country to join. Excludeing Iraq, The US has more than 50,000 boots on the ground world wide In military peace keeping operations weather it be Open or covert. so the UN's boasting is just Hot air. Just like Any Military action Clinton ever took. RIP Desert tent!