I thought this was about Islam not the japs?....I wanted to ask a simple question whats the deal with the Muslims and beating on dead ppl? draging them around and etc...dont they know that they are dead? and dont feel a thing.... All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead. Why is it ok to drag dead ppl around but we cant say islam is all aboiut converting or die....
Major_Spittle, notice to self: Language you are speaking is called english not american-ish.Major_Spittle wrote:
Where are my roots from, please tell me.PRiMACORD wrote:
Spittle is too dumb to realize where his roots are from, how shocking.Major_Spittle wrote:
[
Not my fault you got such an outragous accent, and there is no "r" in Ass.
Let's see what you know about me, hmmmm, I am American. Therefore my roots must be?????? Please tell me I am dying to know.
And so do African and poor S.American countries! And its still generalising them, maybe the poorest of the poor do but the people in the cities and towns dont. Basing a whole race on one part of it is being racist.PRiMACORD wrote:
They use water + hand or in middle eastern countries, just water (they have hoses next to the toilets you can point at your ass and come out squeaky clean).Vilham wrote:
Read it, he just stated that Muslims wipe their hands with their ass's, he is generalising Muslims in a bad way, that IS being racist.Ikarti wrote:
You're just figuring this out?
Just using toilet paper is disgusting, leaves lots of poo caked in your ass.
The point is that I made a comment about the people who took offense to what the Pope said. If you equated them with all muslims you are a racist and have stereotyped the race as all having taken offense to the statement the Pope made. I never once said anything about Muslims, or all Muslims, or People from the Middle East. You brought race into. I talked about a group of people that were stupid and clearly took what the Pope said out of context. I made fun of these people, soooooo.Vilham wrote:
Yes and the people who took offense are all the major Islamic religious leaders who speak for the religion! Your the one who is slow and clearly doesnt even watch or read the news.Major_Spittle wrote:
I stated that the people who took offense to what the Pope said wipe their ass with there hand.Vilham wrote:
Read it, he just stated that Muslims wipe their hands with their ass's, he is generalising Muslims in a bad way, that IS being racist.
Come on folks, lets get your argument straight. I know your all slow, but at least try.
You are so stupid you sit on the TV and watch the couch all day.
Now does that mean that everyone in your race does that??????? No, so STFU you idiot.
YES you hit the jack pot, ALL MUSLIMS drag dead people around. I saw this one guy right, he was parking his car, next thing you know, BAM!. dead people start flying out of his car.Orion5413 wrote:
I thought this was about Islam not the japs?....I wanted to ask a simple question whats the deal with the Muslims and beating on dead ppl? draging them around and etc...dont they know that they are dead? and dont feel a thing.... All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead. Why is it ok to drag dead ppl around but we cant say islam is all aboiut converting or die....
I clean my ass with water (had hoses next to my toilets installed) or my hand + water if needed. It's a lot more hygienic.Vilham wrote:
And so do African and poor S.American countries! And its still generalising them, maybe the poorest of the poor do but the people in the cities and towns dont. Basing a whole race on one part of it is being racist.PRiMACORD wrote:
They use water + hand or in middle eastern countries, just water (they have hoses next to the toilets you can point at your ass and come out squeaky clean).Vilham wrote:
Read it, he just stated that Muslims wipe their hands with their ass's, he is generalising Muslims in a bad way, that IS being racist.
Just using toilet paper is disgusting, leaves lots of poo caked in your ass.
If you got shit on your leg, would you clean it off with just toilet paper?
I'm just saying, Major_Hickle tried to make it sound like a dirty thing when in fact, it's a lot cleaner.
LOL, you win. I agree that a Hose next to the toilet would be nice, but it would suck to just wipe shit off you ass onto your hand, right???? I would perfer the shit to just stay on my ass if that is my only option, either I can clean the shit off of myself or not. I'm just not gonna carry it around on my hand though.PRiMACORD wrote:
I clean my ass with water (had hoses next to my toilets installed) or my hand + water if needed. It's a lot more hygienic.Vilham wrote:
And so do African and poor S.American countries! And its still generalising them, maybe the poorest of the poor do but the people in the cities and towns dont. Basing a whole race on one part of it is being racist.PRiMACORD wrote:
They use water + hand or in middle eastern countries, just water (they have hoses next to the toilets you can point at your ass and come out squeaky clean).
Just using toilet paper is disgusting, leaves lots of poo caked in your ass.
If you got shit on your leg, would you clean it off with just toilet paper?
I'm just saying, Major_Hickle tried to make it sound like a dirty thing when in fact, it's a lot cleaner.
Yep, hoses are better than TP. oh and fyi, TP stands for toilet paper.
P.S. fyi stand for "for your information"
P.S. fyi P.S. stands for Postal Subscript.
Last edited by Major_Spittle (2006-09-23 16:21:10)
You just outted yourself as a racist.mafia996630 wrote:
YES you hit the jack pot, ALL MUSLIMS drag dead people around. I saw this one guy right, he was parking his car, next thing you know, BAM!. dead people start flying out of his car.
Yes yes, that would suck.Major_Spittle wrote:
but it would suck to just wipe shit off you as onto you hand, right???? .
Thats not the way it works tho. They take a jug of water with a long neck (flower watering thingies) and apply water as they rub the shit off there respective asses.
The only times i use TP only is if i get caught outside in a public bathroom and have no choice.
The fact you make the statement 'All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead.' shows you are closeminded, and possibly want them dead.Orion5413 wrote:
I thought this was about Islam not the japs?....I wanted to ask a simple question whats the deal with the Muslims and beating on dead ppl? draging them around and etc...dont they know that they are dead? and dont feel a thing.... All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead. Why is it ok to drag dead ppl around but we cant say islam is all aboiut converting or die....
Not all Americans are like Spittle, not all Muslims are like the ones who hate the West as a whole, but, the tendancy to generalise both peoples as scum from such examples is sadly... rife.
And yeah Spittle, I understand your statement about us not being 'allowed' guns. And you needing to do it at range instead of stepping up and bitchslapping people, but the view that UK citizens having the right not to carry guns corellates to UK citizens not carrying guns, is naive at best.
As to the comments about Japan and how it was sad, but they bought it on themselves.....
Yeah, the civilians who died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki bought it on themselves as much as all the American civilians who died in 9/11.
I'm sure some of you will flame some more, but I really don't give a fuck about your opinions. Some of you will read this and say 'but Fox, thats a bit unfair... because'. And those are the ones that should have more say in your country.
Americans who want to kill Muslims are called Patriots.
Muslims who want to kill Americans are called Terrorists and Extremists.
Scum is Scum. Period.
Now then... Show me proof that ALL Muslims drag dead people around. Yes, ALL Muslims. That includes me, my sister, my brother, my sister's boyfriend, and all my schoolmates. I don't see them dragging corpses around in the school compound. A handful of Americans drag corpses around. Are all Americans narrow-minded then? And no, Islam is NOT all about converting or die. We respect people's ability to make their own choices, the Quran instructs that if one wishes to try and convert someone, one must do so in a peaceful manner, and if he declines, so be it. Let him go. It's his own problem if he wants to burn in hell, riiight?Orion5413 wrote:
I thought this was about Islam not the japs?....I wanted to ask a simple question whats the deal with the Muslims and beating on dead ppl? draging them around and etc...dont they know that they are dead? and dont feel a thing.... All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead. Why is it ok to drag dead ppl around but we cant say islam is all aboiut converting or die....
You, sir, have no sense of sarcasm.Major_Spittle wrote:
You just outted yourself as a racist.mafia996630 wrote:
YES you hit the jack pot, ALL MUSLIMS drag dead people around. I saw this one guy right, he was parking his car, next thing you know, BAM!. dead people start flying out of his car.
'but Fox, thats a bit unfair... because'..............Foxhoundmgw wrote:
The fact you make the statement 'All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead.' shows you are closeminded, and possibly want them dead.Orion5413 wrote:
I thought this was about Islam not the japs?....I wanted to ask a simple question whats the deal with the Muslims and beating on dead ppl? draging them around and etc...dont they know that they are dead? and dont feel a thing.... All the Muslims did is once again prove to the world that we are right in the fact they are very closed minded and want to see the rest of us dead. Why is it ok to drag dead ppl around but we cant say islam is all aboiut converting or die....
Not all Americans are like Spittle, not all Muslims are like the ones who hate the West as a whole, but, the tendancy to generalise both peoples as scum from such examples is sadly... rife.
And yeah Spittle, I understand your statement about us not being 'allowed' guns. And you needing to do it at range instead of stepping up and bitchslapping people, but the view that UK citizens having the right not to carry guns corellates to UK citizens not carrying guns, is naive at best.
As to the comments about Japan and how it was sad, but they bought it on themselves.....
Yeah, the civilians who died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki bought it on themselves as much as all the American civilians who died in 9/11.
I'm sure some of you will flame some more, but I really don't give a fuck about your opinions. Some of you will read this and say 'but Fox, thats a bit unfair... because'. And those are the ones that should have more say in your country.
Americans who want to kill Muslims are called Patriots.
Muslims who want to kill Americans are called Terrorists and Extremists.
Scum is Scum. Period.
There is no way you can defend Islam as being open mined and a religion of tolerance.
Islam goes against the ideals we as Americans live by......example......how they treat their women as inferior. Western ideology does not mix well with Islamic ideology.
Wow, your govt. doesn't allow you the right to protect yourself or your family??
It was war, a war Japan started. It is widely believed that the alternative to dropping the bombs would be over a million American casualties alone, not to mention the death toll of the civilians. Please put things in the proper perspective. Or do you want a leader that cares more for the lives of the enemy over the lives of his own citizens?
If you don't care about others opinions, who are you to be calling ANYONE close minded?
Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us.
I don't recall a single organized protest in America against Muslims. I can't remember an American mob killing and hanging Muslims over a bridge, or beheading them on video. I can't recall hearing about an American mob, dismembering Muslims and tieing them behind a truck and dragging them through the streets, all on video of course. I don't recall the last American suicide bomber that ran into a market full of unsuspecting civilians and blowing everyone up. Or worse kidnap a Muslim and tie them to a car bomb without them knowing it, and release them, only to be blown up in a crowd of civilians.
It is best that people like you save your sympathies for people like that, or NOBODY would love them.
Lowing you have no idea how isalm treat women, u r confusing it with how arabs, mostly guld area treat women. FYI what they do there is tradition. Sadly it is mistaken as out religion. The life style of pple is a mix between religion and traditions. The first muslim follower was a woman. Islam values woman ("heaven is beneath the feet of the mothers"). And no dont start with the 4 wives concept if ur thinking about it. Its not right, u r allowed to do it if u treat them all equally which is impossible for humans to do, so No u cant.
"Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us. "
dude:
Vietnam
Korea
Bosinia
Iraq1
Kosovo
Afgahnistan
Iraq2
in a period of 40 yrs, u live for it! u love it! and dont say to help these pple, it was never about them.
"Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us. "
dude:
Vietnam
Korea
Bosinia
Iraq1
Kosovo
Afgahnistan
Iraq2
in a period of 40 yrs, u live for it! u love it! and dont say to help these pple, it was never about them.
We do not treat our women as inferior. The head-to-toe robe is so that we judge them on personality, rather than looks.
I don't really give 2 shits how they treat their women, or why. Bottom line is, it goes against the grain of the west and that was my point.Abstinuous wrote:
Lowing you have no idea how isalm treat women, u r confusing it with how arabs, mostly guld area treat women. FYI what they do there is tradition. Sadly it is mistaken as out religion. The life style of pple is a mix between religion and traditions. The first muslim follower was a woman. Islam values woman ("heaven is beneath the feet of the mothers"). And no dont start with the 4 wives concept if ur thinking about it. Its not right, u r allowed to do it if u treat them all equally which is impossible for humans to do, so No u cant.
"Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us. "
dude:
Vietnam
Korea
Bosinia
Iraq1
Kosovo
Afgahnistan
Iraq2
in a period of 40 yrs, u live for it! u love it! and dont say to help these pple, it was never about them.
I find it ironic that you name all the conflicts the US was involved in, WITH THE REST OF THE UN, as your example of the US strong arming the world. Save Vietnam. Also, if you think we are supposedto stand by and let shit happen that will turn into a threat for the US and its allies then we will disagree there as well.
Out of all I posted, I see that you could really only TRY and argue against half of my sentence on women and the fact that we will defend ourselves and our allies.............figures
Out of order...Abstinuous wrote:
"Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us. "
dude:
Vietnam
Korea
Bosinia
Iraq1
Kosovo
Afgahnistan
Iraq2
in a period of 40 yrs, u live for it! u love it! and dont say to help these pple, it was never about them.
Korea = Trying to keep the south free of the communist north and china. Result: South still free and doing great.
Vietnam = Same kind of goal except liberals and politicians interferred and then called the US soldier a "baby killer". Result: A whole generation of AMericans (who are now in power by the way) that refuse to let cowards determine foreign policy ever again.
Bosnia = Trying to stop ethnic cleansing...mostly muslim on christian and christian on muslim (some parts of the world never grow up) Result: It's peaceful over there now isn't it?
Iraq 1 = A dictator invades a neighboring muslim country on trumped-up reasons because they're super-rich with oil. We (The World) kick his Arse and send him back to his own messed-up country. Result: Kuwait is still free and rich as ever. Oh by the way, they actually like the US (Trust me on this too, I was there).
Kosovo = The US stopping "Christian" Serbians from mass killing muslim albanians in Kosovo because of the natural resources in Kosovo (Again, don't fight me on this, my parents are missionaries in Kosovo and have talked to many who lived through the war, they love americans). Result: Kosovo is re-building on on their way to becoming their own country.
Afghanistan = A radical muslim goevernment (Taliban) than came to power through force not elections, that provided ample training groud and resources for Al Q. Al Q then turns around and runs two plans into the WTC, one into the Pentagon, and one into the ground in PA killing 3000+ americans. We bomb the heck out of them, remove the majority of the training camps and remove the Taliban from power. Result: A newly ELECTED governemnt, the Taliban fractured and what's left of Al Q stuffed into caves somewhere on the Afghan-Paki border.... To be continued
Iraq 2 = Given the increased threat to the world from radical islam and the "known" weapons that sadamm possesed plus the fact that he had no love for the US, in fact was pretty pissed at us for ruining his party in the early '90s (I say "known" because we knew he had them from previous uses and weapons inspections, but he started playing games with the inspectors for the last couple years and know no one can find them). We warn him repeatedly to comply with the inspectors to ensure he has no more "toys" whith which to terrorize his own population (read Kurds, Shias) or anyone else or we take him out. He calls our bluff, we don't blink....Bye Bye Sadamm...hope the firing squad doesn't miss.
Result: Iraq now has an ELECTED government (I was there on their first election day in Baghdad, I saw the joy and blue fingers). While it is now a center for all the terrorists to easily attack US, its still progress. To be continued...
The moral of the story...Get the facts right about the causes...don't throw out a list of conflicts as a lame attempt to prove that the US is just a war-mongering country that likes to pick fights.
My whole argument was that ur taking Islam with the wrong point of view.lowing wrote:
I don't really give 2 shits how they treat their women, or why. Bottom line is, it goes against the grain of the west and that was my point.
I find it ironic that you name all the conflicts the US was involved in, WITH THE REST OF THE UN, as your example of the US strong arming the world. Save Vietnam. Also, if you think we are supposedto stand by and let shit happen that will turn into a threat for the US and its allies then we will disagree there as well.
Out of all I posted, I see that you could really only TRY and argue against half of my sentence on women and the fact that we will defend ourselves and our allies.............figures
edit: its not Islam that make the women inferior, its the society. (im not defending that point, im pointing it out)
and who made the US judge over the world? Its the same thing the Brits did, they conquered most of the world, Its not your planet.=CA=lamcrmbem wrote:
Out of order...
u honestly think some1 will attack the US if they were just in the their forgein policy?
Last edited by Abstinuous (2006-09-24 08:39:48)
Do you see the state of Korea or Vietnam or Bosnia or Iraq or Kosovo or Afghanistan in the US now? Do we have 56 states instead of just 50? When has the US conquered the rest of the world like the Brits did. Do you see US colonies everywhere? Remember, in most cases it was the world or that country that asked the US for help....Vietnam (Started with advisors trying to help the South fight the North), Korea, Iraq (US mission, Kuwait asked for help), Bosnia (UN Mission), Kosovo (UN Mission).Abstinuous wrote:
and who made the US judge over the world? Its the same thing the Brits did, they conquered most of the world, Its not your planet.=CA=lamcrmbem wrote:
Out of order...
u honestly think some1 will attack the US if they were just in the their forgein policy?
Your last "u honestly think some1 will attack the US if they were just in the their forgein policy?" Please clarify and I can respond.
Trigger happy.
Lowing Lowing Lowing....lowing wrote:
'but Fox, thats a bit unfair... because'..............
There is no way you can defend Islam as being open mined and a religion of tolerance.
Islam goes against the ideals we as Americans live by......example......how they treat their women as inferior. Western ideology does not mix well with Islamic ideology.
Wow, your govt. doesn't allow you the right to protect yourself or your family??
It was war, a war Japan started. It is widely believed that the alternative to dropping the bombs would be over a million American casualties alone, not to mention the death toll of the civilians. Please put things in the proper perspective. Or do you want a leader that cares more for the lives of the enemy over the lives of his own citizens?
If you don't care about others opinions, who are you to be calling ANYONE close minded?
Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us.
I don't recall a single organized protest in America against Muslims. I can't remember an American mob killing and hanging Muslims over a bridge, or beheading them on video. I can't recall hearing about an American mob, dismembering Muslims and tieing them behind a truck and dragging them through the streets, all on video of course. I don't recall the last American suicide bomber that ran into a market full of unsuspecting civilians and blowing everyone up. Or worse kidnap a Muslim and tie them to a car bomb without them knowing it, and release them, only to be blown up in a crowd of civilians.
It is best that people like you save your sympathies for people like that, or NOBODY would love them.
Islam Idealogy has been around since the time of the pyramids... American Ideals didn't even exist as you refer to them today. You are Dead on the button. The Idealogys do NOT mix, so why does the West keep trying?
It doesn't matter if my government allows me the right to defend my home, family and person, it is a liberty I will grant myself, at whatever cost I have to pay.
You say I sympathize more for the 'enemy' than I do for your own people. Well, lets look. Your predicted casualties were totalled via the cost of invading, the losses of 'the enemy' were mainly civilians. Would it have been just as fair for Saddam to have dropped a dirty nuke on Washington, Seattle, Los Angeles and Texas so he could save on some casualties? I doubt it. But it does seem that you are saying that civilians everywhere should suck it up if they suffer losses via the actions of the military. So, suck it up. I
I know my own faults, so I am at least qualified to point out those flaws in other people. Even if some people frown and whine about it. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone? Bullshit.
Alot of you keep saying that the majority of Americans don't want to wage war or kill people (I nreally don't give a fuck if you kill the right people, I just don't like 100% non combative civilians being blown apart, from any nation), much as they don't want it done to them. But the world seems to see the ones who say 'fuck you Arab/American, die!' a lot more frequently than they see the more human reactions.
Look at all the stuff our forces in the Middle East have done. But it's ok because we declared war? Hmm, but haven't we already established that an act of war (attacking) is declaring war?
And if you still haven't worked it out lowing, my sympathies lie with the lost. I don't give a fuck about people who keep fighting like it's going to change.
On a final note, don't raise how other people treat their women, spousal abuse is apparently FTW! in many western countries. Address such issues on your own turf before trying to help police other nations.
You may wanna go back and check and see who is actually killing more civilians......MUSLIM extremists, or the coalition? It isn't the coalition with the reputation of car bombing civilian markets, religious sites etc....it also isn't the coalitions reputation to hide and carry out attacks among civilian populations.Foxhoundmgw wrote:
Lowing Lowing Lowing....lowing wrote:
'but Fox, thats a bit unfair... because'..............
There is no way you can defend Islam as being open mined and a religion of tolerance.
Islam goes against the ideals we as Americans live by......example......how they treat their women as inferior. Western ideology does not mix well with Islamic ideology.
Wow, your govt. doesn't allow you the right to protect yourself or your family??
It was war, a war Japan started. It is widely believed that the alternative to dropping the bombs would be over a million American casualties alone, not to mention the death toll of the civilians. Please put things in the proper perspective. Or do you want a leader that cares more for the lives of the enemy over the lives of his own citizens?
If you don't care about others opinions, who are you to be calling ANYONE close minded?
Americans as a whole don't want war or to kill anyone. However, we do not tend to stand by and let it be done to us.
I don't recall a single organized protest in America against Muslims. I can't remember an American mob killing and hanging Muslims over a bridge, or beheading them on video. I can't recall hearing about an American mob, dismembering Muslims and tieing them behind a truck and dragging them through the streets, all on video of course. I don't recall the last American suicide bomber that ran into a market full of unsuspecting civilians and blowing everyone up. Or worse kidnap a Muslim and tie them to a car bomb without them knowing it, and release them, only to be blown up in a crowd of civilians.
It is best that people like you save your sympathies for people like that, or NOBODY would love them.
Islam Idealogy has been around since the time of the pyramids... American Ideals didn't even exist as you refer to them today. You are Dead on the button. The Idealogys do NOT mix, so why does the West keep trying?
It doesn't matter if my government allows me the right to defend my home, family and person, it is a liberty I will grant myself, at whatever cost I have to pay.
You say I sympathize more for the 'enemy' than I do for your own people. Well, lets look. Your predicted casualties were totalled via the cost of invading, the losses of 'the enemy' were mainly civilians. Would it have been just as fair for Saddam to have dropped a dirty nuke on Washington, Seattle, Los Angeles and Texas so he could save on some casualties? I doubt it. But it does seem that you are saying that civilians everywhere should suck it up if they suffer losses via the actions of the military. So, suck it up. I
I know my own faults, so I am at least qualified to point out those flaws in other people. Even if some people frown and whine about it. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone? Bullshit.
Alot of you keep saying that the majority of Americans don't want to wage war or kill people (I nreally don't give a fuck if you kill the right people, I just don't like 100% non combative civilians being blown apart, from any nation), much as they don't want it done to them. But the world seems to see the ones who say 'fuck you Arab/American, die!' a lot more frequently than they see the more human reactions.
Look at all the stuff our forces in the Middle East have done. But it's ok because we declared war? Hmm, but haven't we already established that an act of war (attacking) is declaring war?
And if you still haven't worked it out lowing, my sympathies lie with the lost. I don't give a fuck about people who keep fighting like it's going to change.
On a final note, don't raise how other people treat their women, spousal abuse is apparently FTW! in many western countries. Address such issues on your own turf before trying to help police other nations.
Last edited by lowing (2006-09-24 11:05:05)
bavakasha
I gotta adjudicate that Lowing wins.
Coalition forces have targeted MAM's in civilian clothing but the facts are;
When Israel was granted a country the Arabs launched a series of wars; The Yom Kippor, the seven day war, etc. etc. In all the conflicts including the most recent adventure in Lebanon the total # of people combatant and otherwise killed is just over 100k.
In just the Iran/Iraq war over a million muslims died. And the number of muslim civilians killed by mulim government is WAY more than the number killed by Israeli or American governments.
Coalition forces have targeted MAM's in civilian clothing but the facts are;
When Israel was granted a country the Arabs launched a series of wars; The Yom Kippor, the seven day war, etc. etc. In all the conflicts including the most recent adventure in Lebanon the total # of people combatant and otherwise killed is just over 100k.
In just the Iran/Iraq war over a million muslims died. And the number of muslim civilians killed by mulim government is WAY more than the number killed by Israeli or American governments.
Muslims are human before they are Muslims. Humans like power, humans want power and will kill to get power.
And ATG, give me a source for such claims. Not saying your wrong, just want you to give me a source.
And ATG, give me a source for such claims. Not saying your wrong, just want you to give me a source.
Here's one http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ … n-iraq.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_iraq_war
the point is, and yet not down playing muslim civilians having been killed RIP that Muslims have killed MANY more thousands of Muslims than America and Israel combined.
I say, point me to a link showing over one million muslim, or Arabs having been killed by Israel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_iraq_war
the point is, and yet not down playing muslim civilians having been killed RIP that Muslims have killed MANY more thousands of Muslims than America and Israel combined.
I say, point me to a link showing over one million muslim, or Arabs having been killed by Israel.
Last edited by ATG (2006-09-24 11:58:41)