There is one important Thing you forgot. The M203 grenade must travel perhaps 20 meters before it arms and can explode. It makes it useless in CQB in RL.
oberst_enzian wrote:complaining about n00b t00bs is like the spatic complaints about "awp whores" in CS. FFS, its in the game, its there to be used. If you own with it - good for you, stick with it. What the hell do you complainers want? Send your complaints to EA. Then they can send them to the military that they based their weapons on.
Dear Department of Defence,
I am writing concerning the use of grenade launchers by the armed forces. Its just not fair on the enemy that you allow your troopers in the field with such an effective weapon. Please remove them from service and produce a written request form that the enemy may sign to approve the deployment of incendiary devices upon their person.
Gamer for Dignifed and Formal Use of Grenades
Conclusion, Weapons in BF2 are FAR away from RL. It would be OK if they were not unbalanced. RL VS gameplay. And the main thing i dislike in BF2 are the invulnerable bomber.
Last edited by <b|k> lukie (2005-12-01 13:40:18)