Oh, it's serious. I'm not denying that. My argument was always that this couldn't be controlled. Control freaks always want to control every externality. This was one they weren't going to win, no matter how much they tried to lock the rest of the world down around them.SuperJail Warden wrote:
About how many deaths would there need to be for you to say that this was a serious issue?Jay wrote:
And what's the death rate? Still think 2.2 million Americans will die?uziq wrote:
that is 100% correct. it's almost as if the epidemiologists' models are working. viral growth is exponential. "this totally blindsided us", says trump, an illiterate.
jay, comment?
No, sorry.
Maybe you shouldn't panic about everything.
Maybe the world isn't ending.
Maybe what I originally said, that you can't control everyone and lock everyone down, that the virus would spread regardless of any measures taken, and that quarantines were completely pointless, was correct?
We crashed the economy, for nothing.
Millions of people lost their jobs, for nothing.
Literally everything I've said has turned out to be correct, except maybe for the severity of the illness. I admit I underestimated that a bit.
Did they really think that shutting down NYC schools, kicking a million kids out and sending them home, and they were going to quietly stay cooped up in their apartment for two weeks? Have you ever met NYC teenagers?
This response was dictated by the Upper East Siders and the Park Slopers. They have the means and the jobs that allow themselves to squirrel themselves away in their co-op for a few weeks. They were super quick to self-quarantine themselves when the news came out and demanded that everyone else follow suit. The poor? Not so much.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat