when have the arts crowd ever 'endlessly dismissed' STEM as 'grubby and worthless technicians'? i have literally never witnessed this culture or attitude in my life, including 4/5 years spent in actual humanities departments surrounded by waifs, aesthetes, poète maudits, etc. this is all completely projection on your part, dilbert. you have some weird inferiority complex or social anxiety/ire about arts people. trust me, people studying philosophy or literature seldom think about STEM. they certainly do not think it 'beneath them'. where they do think about it, it's to engage in interdisciplinary work in a spirit of collaboration, as with, for example, eco-criticism, crossovers between neuroscience and linguistics, bringing big data techniques to texts, etc.
i swear for years on this forum it was me pointing out this weird, insular (ingrown, really) attitude that all the engineering types displayed. the masters-of-the-universe, master-race type thinking that all engineers evince. 'our degree is uniquely difficult! we are a special class!' it was endemic on this forum during bf2s' peak. and, time and time again, i would say how strange it was that STEM graduates, especially in that weird bush years military hoorah phase, had this culture of chauvinism. arts and humanities graduates are nothing like the same thing. i have never met a single arts or humanities person in my working life who talks shit about STEM, either. why the hell would they?!? it's weird and aberrant enough, watching you engineers flex and preen at every given opportunity.
don't pretend that the rest of the world has the same chip on their shoulder as you do. people with non-STEM degrees are nowhere near as fixated on STEM as you are with the arts and humanities.
Last edited by uziq (2020-09-29 03:30:10)