DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6920|Disaster Free Zone

Jay wrote:

I pay about $1600 a month for a two bedroom apartment with a 30 minute commute to work. In order to get something even remotely equivalent space-wise (with a commute twice as long) I'll have to spend at least $400k minimum, which comes out to ~$1800 a month. Plus property tax. Plus homeowner's insurance. Plus time spent landscaping. Plus money spent doing maintenance and upgrades. Owning generally sucks a big fat one and is completely pointless unless you have kids.
I could buy a $600k 2 bed apartment, or rent the one next door for $620 per week. Mortgage repayments on 600k @5% are ~$680. $60 a week is a small price to pay to end up with a massive asset at the end of 25 years counted against having literally nothing.

Also your rent will continue to rise with inflation, your repayments wont and in real terms will go down, and your asset will continue to appreciate.

Uzique The Lesser wrote:

how is someone 'saddled' with rent? you pay it, then you're free. doesn't seem like a 'saddling' to me. no commitment - or only very short-term, anyway. can up and move anytime, normally within the month's notice.
Where are you going to move to? A cardboard box or park bench, you can move all you like but you're still going to have to pay to live somewhere.

Jay wrote:

If I took the money difference between owning and renting and invested it instead, I would have far more money in the bank after 30 years than I would when I sold the house. You have to understand that when you buy a house with a mortgage you have to see the price of the home just about double to see any form of profit at all.

Take out a mortgage for $500k at 3.5% and at the end of the 30 year mortgage you've paid $805k for the home. I will have paid $305k to the bank in interest ($850/month). During that time I'll have also paid about $1k/month in property tax, another $360k. So to break even, I need to see that $500k home turn into a $1.165M home. That doesn't normally happen unless there is hyperinflation like in the 70s, or a silly housing boom like in the 00s.
If your house hasn't doubled, or even tripled in 30 years, well... you fucked up somewhere.

http://www.ironfish.com.au/images/maps/sydney.jpg
1000% increase in 30 years.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6955
GL if you have to move to another country/city for work.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
sydney is a pretty exceptional instance of the house-price rising. i think you australians forget your economic and property growth is not really replicated in many other places in the western world right now. which, good for you. but doesn't mean an american or european is stupid to not want to get shackled to a mortgage.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
Where are you going to move to? A cardboard box or park bench, you can move all you like but you're still going to have to pay to live somewhere..
uuuh are you stupid? if you rent you can generally afford to rent in a nice area close to an urban hub that you wouldn't ordinarily be able to foot a deposit or mortgage deal for. most of my graduate friends working in london in their 20's live in very nice, affluent middle-class areas... very close to the centre of things. they would never be able to live with such convenience and ease, close to work and play, if they were all looking to 'get on the housing ladder' (average age for people's first mortgage in the UK = 35). i rented in an area where the average house price is £1.1mill. i lived very well and enjoyed renting in such a salubrious area. no way would i be able to live there if i was looking to buy or get on the property ladder. as it stood, i lived a very comfortable lifestyle with plenty of spare cash monthly to do what i wanted - and i lived in a luxury property/area. hardly "cardboard box or park bench". you can live well in the city renting. don't be such a berk.

but cool, jump ahead of the curve and get on the 'housing ladder' before you're 30. enjoy spending your 20's out in a cultural and economic backwater, because you wanted to be 'prudent'. especially when it doesn't necessarily even make you financially better off. i'll take renting in london, thanks.

and are we not talking to the guy who said he didn't go to university because it 'wasn't worth it'? sounds like your financial nous is really facilitating a thrilling lifestyle.

Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-07-03 06:23:51)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6955

Uzique The Lesser wrote:

sydney is a pretty exceptional instance of the house-price rising. i think you australians forget your economic and property growth is not really replicated in many other places in the western world right now. which, good for you. but doesn't mean an american or european is stupid to not want to get shackled to a mortgage.
property values in the nice suburbs have grown more than 3 fold in the past 7 years. it was just shit was dirt cheap back in the day because we had a shitty economy until the 2000s
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
I'm in a duplex where the rent is $600 a week, in Crows Nest - Inner North Shore, Sydney. About 2 minutes drive from the Harbour Bridge and into Sydney CBD. The mortgage repayment on a place like this would be more like $800+ a week.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
do you have to foot large deposits in aus, too? that's the main thing that prohibits people from settling down here: the fact that, to settle in a nice area or move into a property in a decent area, you basically need a relative to die and leave you a large amount of capital. not many people can afford to save up £50k+ to put down on a house.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
I asked at the bank last year when I was getting my car loan. She said these days we only need a 5% deposit. We've discussed it and would prefer to save up at least 10% as a bare minimum, though at the moment the likelihood of this happening any time within the next few years are very slim as I'm only putting away around $100 a week into savings and my gf is only working part time at the moment.

Last edited by Jaekus (2013-07-03 06:41:30)

Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
UK deposit is nearer 25%. so there you go. the option for a young graduate professional in the UK are basically thus:

- work for a top graduate firm / high-paying profession, obviously located in a city (london/manchester/etc.) where property prices are very high. earn a good wage, but you must pay rent, because a) city-living is incredibly expensive, not much money to be saved; b) city-living is extremely mobile, and you may not stay in the same borough/neighourhood for long; c) hardly anyone can afford to own property in areas like london, literally some of the most expensive real-estate in the world.

or, if you want to be drunkface and not be a 'stupid renter on a bench':

- don't work for a top firm, don't chase a high-flying career, work for a provincial and parochial business out in nowheresville, making a lot less than your peers in the city, with a lot less room for promotion. nothing to do, hardly any major cultural or night-life attractions. save up for 5 years in the suburbs, here, working your job for a second-rate firm, until you can afford to put down that 25% deposit on a house that is more modestly priced in a more modest area (average first house price is about 5x average income). get a mortgage, then spend the rest of your life in that shit area. never go to the big city and live a fast-paced life. never push yourself or make use of your degree and potential. because you're being 'sensible', and tying yourself to a property, in a small industrial town in the west midlands.

okay. think me and all my friends are just going to rent for our 20's and 30's. thanks for your concern, though. i may be more interested in living a quiet life out in the country where that 25% deposit and property-owning lifestyle are affordable when i want to actually raise a family or semi-retire. fuck spending the prime of my life saving up for some bricks and mortar though.

Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-07-03 06:49:47)

Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
Yeah I've heard London is ridiculously expensive. So is Sydney in its better parts of course but owning property in a good suburb is certainly not a stretch for a young professional with a good career. You can own a new two bedroom apartment in a suburb like where I live (Crows Nest) for well under $1 million and be 10-15 minutes on a bus from the CBD.

Case in point - http://www.realestate.com.au/property-a … -114126671
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6955

Jaekus wrote:

Yeah I've heard London is ridiculously expensive. So is Sydney in its better parts of course but owning property in a good suburb is certainly not a stretch for a young professional with a good career. You can own a new two bedroom apartment in a suburb like where I live (Crows Nest) for well under $1 million and be 10-15 minutes on a bus from the CBD.

Case in point - http://www.realestate.com.au/property-a … -114126671
yeah a million dollars aint shit lol.

for good places you definitely need a million+ for a three bedroom house.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
the 25% deposit here and the high council taxes and extra bills mean that getting on the property ladder is just ridiculous. the last generation of yuppies and property owners/landlords pulled the ladder up after them. the new young urban professionals with lots of disposable income just rent, with pretty much no expectation of getting on the housing market until they find an equally well-earning partner and want to get a 'family home'. so basically the arrangement is to continue renting with a partner or to actually live in a house/flat share, as if you're still student lodgers. nobody is saving up fifty grand in their 20's whilst working and living in london - especially if you factor in student loan repayments and suchlike that were 'required' by the system of education to even get them to that well-earning, high-flying lifestyle.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
A nice two bedroom apartment at $800k for a young professional couple is certainly achievable. My girlfriend's sister and her husband saved up $100k and bought an apartment for around $450k in Kangaroo Point in Brisbane (5 mins from Brisbane CBD) two years ago and are already looking to buy a second investment property. Granted the price is significantly lower but were they in Sydney paying double it's certainly doable.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7010|PNW

Uzique The Lesser wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

"less interested in homeownership"

I'm less interested in space shuttle ownership, but I'd still like one someday.
yeah no that makes no sense at all. you are treating people not wanting a home with that much incredulity? many nations are simply renters - many european nations, for e.g. they rent in the centre of beautiful cities, lovely apartments and property, but they never want to own. yet you somehow think that's so ridiculous that it's on par with wanting to own a space shuttle? riiiight.
What I meant was that home ownership is a pipe dream for a lot of young Americans. As usual you read into things in the wrong direction.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6955

Jaekus wrote:

A nice two bedroom apartment at $800k for a young professional couple is certainly achievable. My girlfriend's sister and her husband saved up $100k and bought an apartment for around $450k in Kangaroo Point in Brisbane (5 mins from Brisbane CBD) two years ago and are already looking to buy a second investment property. Granted the price is significantly lower but were they in Sydney paying double it's certainly doable.
its only possible in aus because were the only country where plumbers can pull 100k a year.

imah get on that sweet sweet welfare (i somehow qualified lawl) which will cover my portion of the rent (250 a week)

thanks mr ruddkips
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
a 2-bedroom apartment in a suburb of london that is within 30 minutes of london's centre will cost you nearer £750k ($1.3mill aus). that's in the typical sort of 'young working professional' areas, like clapham in SW4 - nowhere near within '5 minutes' of the City, but okay, still. with a 25% deposit, good luck ever finding the cash to afford that.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
That's what I mean though. London is hell expensive and I'm not going to try to argue that Sydney is somehow on par, lol.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
but it's still the same point. people living in cities are more disposed to rent. it's just part of that lifestyle. i don't know why anyone would go through the hassle and financial cost of buying a property in the city. who wants to raise a family in the city? it's like a 10-15 year plan, max. renting clearly has a place.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
I agree. I prefer the lifestyle of inner city life so I've long accepted that unless a significant windfall comes my way I will be renting for quite some time. I'm fairly comfortable with that though. Some people get hung up on owning property but it's never fussed me too much. Sure, there's a certain appeal to owning your own home and of course there's the investment potential but I'm not ready to be tied down to one place for the next 20+ years.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493
property as an 'investment' normally seems to be a euphemism for 'something for your kids after you're dead'. no thank you.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
If it's your home, for sure.

Last edited by Jaekus (2013-07-03 07:35:11)

DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6920|Disaster Free Zone
Sounds like you're all just 'too cool' to be financially responsible.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5417|Sydney
By choosing not to purchase property I'm somehow being financially irresponsible? lol
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493

DrunkFace wrote:

Sounds like you're all just 'too cool' to be financially responsible.
oh okay the guy who dropped out of university because it "cost too much" and the guy who has a mortgage in his 20's is raging at everyone else because they're 'too cool'. maybe they just had different circumstances to you? maybe they just want to lead a different life? it's their money. stay mad bro. every single one of your posts in d&st reek of bitterness over your life choices. you're that boorish guy who at age 21 is trying to be "adult" and scowls at all his peers who are "so immature".
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4493

Jaekus wrote:

By choosing not to purchase property I'm somehow being financially irresponsible? lol
the only way to live your life and spend your money is PROPERTY PROPERTY PROPERTY! you must own! forget most of europe. they are too cool.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard